H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 04:32 UTC

Madison Keys vs Sloane Stephens H2H: 2-5

Sloane Stephens holds a 5–2 lead over Madison Keys in their WTA head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, they are tied 2–2 on clay, while Sloane Stephens leads 3–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Sloane Stephens won the 2021 US Open first round 6-3 1-6 7-6(7).

USA Age 31 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
2 5
7 main draw meetings
USA Age 33 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Sep 1, 2021* US Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Sloane Stephens #66 6-3 1-6 7-6(7) Madison Keys #42 Match data
May 12, 2021* Rome WTA 1000 R64 Clay Madison Keys #23 4-6 6-2 7-5 Sloane Stephens #65 Match data
Apr 8, 2021* Charleston 1 WTA 500 R32 Clay Sloane Stephens #57 6-4 6-4 Madison Keys #24 Match data
Apr 6, 2019* Charleston WTA 500 QF Clay Madison Keys #18 7-6(6) 4-6 6-2 Sloane Stephens #8 Match data
Jun 9, 2018* Roland Garros Grand Slam SF Clay Sloane Stephens #10 6-4 6-4 Madison Keys #13 Match data
Sep 10, 2017* US Open Grand Slam F Hard Sloane Stephens #83 6-3 6-0 Madison Keys #16 Match data
Mar 25, 2015* Miami WTA 1000 R64 Hard Sloane Stephens #45 6-4 6-2 Madison Keys #18 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Madison Keys #23 #5 4,999 2,136 363 211 63.2% 1 1 0 6 3 11
Sloane Stephens #315 #3 5,727 1,970 298 240 55.4% 1 1 0 2 4 8

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Madison Keys Sloane Stephens
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 2009 1–1 50.0% #616 1,512 0 0
16 2011 1–2 33.3% #273 1,516 0 0
17 2012 1–4 20.0% #137 1,514 0 0 2010 2–3 40.0% #204 1,518 0 0
18 2013 24–17 58.5% #38 1,726 0 0 2011 7–9 43.8% #96 1,581 0 0
19 2014 27–21 56.2% #30 1,742 0 1 2012 21–17 55.3% #38 1,709 0 0
20 2015 31–19 62.0% #18 1,802 0 1 2013 40–22 64.5% #12 1,831 0 0
21 2016 41–16 71.9% #8 1,915 0 2 2014 20–19 51.3% #36 1,733 0 0
22 2017 17–10 63.0% #19 1,892 0 3 2015 34–20 63.0% #30 1,798 0 1
23 2018 28–15 65.1% #17 1,899 0 3 2016 21–8 72.4% #35 1,800 0 4
24 2019 27–13 67.5% #13 1,910 0 5 2017 15–7 68.2% #13 1,879 1 5
25 2020 8–5 61.5% #16 1,866 0 5 2018 35–18 66.0% #6 1,931 1 6
26 2021 11–15 42.3% #56 1,731 0 5 2019 21–18 53.8% #25 1,789 1 6
27 2022 30–19 61.2% #11 1,863 0 6 2020 4–11 26.7% #39 1,642 1 6
28 2023 29–17 63.0% #12 1,879 0 7 2021 18–17 51.4% #65 1,762 1 6
29 2024 25–12 67.6% #21 1,950 0 8 2022 18–17 51.4% #37 1,784 1 7
30 2025 37–15 71.2% #7 1,964 1 10 2023 21–20 51.2% #47 1,799 1 7
31 2026 25–10 71.4% #23 2,020 1 11 2024 19–21 47.5% #74 1,691 1 8
32 2025 0–5 0.0% #479 1,607 1 8
33 2026 2–8 20.0% #315 1,616 1 8