H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 16:32 UTC

Madison Keys vs Venus Williams H2H: 4-2

Madison Keys holds a 4–2 lead over Venus Williams in their WTA head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Madison Keys leads 4–1 on hard courts, while Venus Williams leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Madison Keys won the 2023 Montreal second round 6-2 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Madison Keys
USA Age 31 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
4 – 2
6 main draw meetings
Venus Williams
USA Age 46 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 9, 2023* Montreal WTA 1000 R64 Hard Madison Keys #16 6-2 7-5 Venus Williams #524 Match data
Aug 17, 2019* Cincinnati WTA 1000 QF Hard Madison Keys #18 6-2 6-3 Venus Williams #65 Match data
Jul 29, 2016* Montreal WTA 1000 R16 Hard Madison Keys #12 6-1 6-7(2) 6-3 Venus Williams #6 Match data
Nov 2, 2015 Zhuhai WTA 500 RR Hard Venus Williams #11 3-6 7-6(5) 6-1 Madison Keys #19 Match data
Jan 29, 2015* Australian Open Grand Slam QF Hard Madison Keys #35 6-3 4-6 6-4 Venus Williams #18 Match data
Apr 6, 2013* Charleston WTA 500 QF Clay Venus Williams #24 6-4 6-4 Madison Keys #77 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Madison Keys #23 #5 4,999 2,136 363 211 63.2% 1 1 0 6 3 11
Venus Williams #467 #1 7,452 2,362 768 288 72.7% 7 9 1 20 10 47

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Madison Keys Venus Williams
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 2009 1–1 50.0% #616 1,512 0 0 1994 1–1 50.0% — 1,525 0 0
15 — — — — — — — 1995 2–3 40.0% #205 1,561 0 0
16 2011 1–2 33.3% #273 1,516 0 0 1996 2–5 28.6% #216 1,571 0 0
17 2012 1–4 20.0% #137 1,514 0 0 1997 20–13 60.6% #22 1,851 0 0
18 2013 24–17 58.5% #38 1,726 0 0 1998 50–13 79.4% #5 2,094 0 2
19 2014 27–21 56.2% #30 1,742 0 1 1999 57–11 83.8% #3 2,258 0 8
20 2015 31–19 62.0% #18 1,802 0 1 2000 35–4 89.7% #3 2,321 2 13
21 2016 41–16 71.9% #8 1,915 0 2 2001 46–6 88.5% #3 2,338 4 19
22 2017 17–10 63.0% #19 1,892 0 3 2002 63–9 87.5% #2 2,297 4 26
23 2018 28–15 65.1% #17 1,899 0 3 2003 24–5 82.8% #11 2,257 4 27
24 2019 27–13 67.5% #13 1,910 0 5 2004 40–13 75.5% #9 2,072 4 29
25 2020 8–5 61.5% #16 1,866 0 5 2005 34–10 77.3% #10 2,085 5 31
26 2021 11–15 42.3% #56 1,731 0 5 2006 13–6 68.4% #46 2,007 5 31
27 2022 30–19 61.2% #11 1,863 0 6 2007 46–10 82.1% #8 2,048 6 34
28 2023 29–17 63.0% #12 1,879 0 7 2008 37–10 78.7% #6 2,133 7 37
29 2024 25–12 67.6% #21 1,950 0 8 2009 38–16 70.4% #6 1,981 7 39
30 2025 37–15 71.2% #7 1,964 1 10 2010 38–7 84.4% #5 2,057 7 41
31 2026 25–10 71.4% #23 2,020 1 11 2011 8–4 66.7% #102 1,994 7 41
32 — — — — — — — 2012 22–8 73.3% #24 2,007 7 42
33 — — — — — — — 2013 15–11 57.7% #47 1,889 7 42
34 — — — — — — — 2014 33–15 68.8% #18 1,874 7 43
35 — — — — — — — 2015 39–14 73.6% #7 1,957 7 46
36 — — — — — — — 2016 24–14 63.2% #17 1,830 7 47
37 — — — — — — — 2017 38–15 71.7% #5 1,935 7 47
38 — — — — — — — 2018 15–11 57.7% #39 1,867 7 47
39 — — — — — — — 2019 20–15 57.1% #52 1,827 7 47
40 — — — — — — — 2020 1–8 11.1% #79 1,717 7 47
41 — — — — — — — 2021 3–9 25.0% #318 1,649 7 47
42 — — — — — — — 2022 0–4 0.0% #1000 1,603 7 47
43 — — — — — — — 2023 3–7 30.0% #412 1,594 7 47