H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Magda Linette vs Alison Riske-Amritraj H2H: 2-4

Alison Riske-Amritraj holds a 4–2 lead over Magda Linette in their WTA head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Alison Riske-Amritraj leads 4–1 on hard courts, while Magda Linette leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Magda Linette won the 2022 Eastbourne third round 6-7(3) 6-3 7-6(4).

POL Age 34 Right-Handed 171 cm / 5'7"
H2H
2 4
6 main draw meetings
USA Age 36 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 23, 2022* Eastbourne WTA 500 R32 Grass Magda Linette #66 6-7(3) 6-3 7-6(4) Alison Riske-Amritraj #35 Match data
Feb 22, 2022* Doha WTA 1000 R64 Hard Magda Linette #67 2-6 7-6(5) 6-1 Alison Riske-Amritraj #52 Match data
Jan 12, 2022* Adelaide 2 WTA 250 R32 Hard Alison Riske-Amritraj #57 6-4 6-4 Magda Linette #55 Match data
Mar 20, 2018* Miami WTA 1000 R128 Hard Alison Riske-Amritraj #104 1-6 6-0 6-2 Magda Linette #66 Match data
Aug 3, 2017* Stanford WTA 500 R32 Hard Alison Riske-Amritraj #46 6-2 6-4 Magda Linette #86 Match data
Oct 14, 2016* Tianjin WTA 250 R16 Hard Alison Riske-Amritraj #56 6-3 7-6(2) Magda Linette #98 Match data
Aug 13, 2016 Cincinnati WTA 1000 Q1 Q Hard Alison Riske-Amritraj #68 1-6 6-4 6-4 Magda Linette #86 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Magda Linette #51 #19 1,921 1,863 219 227 49.1% 0 0 0 0 4 4
Alison Riske-Amritraj #1,157 #18 2,360 1,853 191 202 48.6% 0 0 0 1 2 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Magda Linette Alison Riske-Amritraj
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 2010 4–4 50.0% #115 1,554 0 0
20 2011 3–8 27.3% #136 1,529 0 0
21 2013 4–2 66.7% #123 1,536 0 0 2012 0–4 0.0% #180 1,488 0 0
22 2014 2–4 33.3% #133 1,517 0 0 2013 11–6 64.7% #57 1,642 0 0
23 2015 9–11 45.0% #90 1,577 0 0 2014 24–22 52.2% #43 1,713 0 1
24 2016 10–15 40.0% #96 1,588 0 0 2015 15–24 38.5% #97 1,602 0 1
25 2017 17–23 42.5% #72 1,728 0 0 2016 23–19 54.8% #39 1,742 0 1
26 2018 13–17 43.3% #81 1,589 0 0 2017 21–24 46.7% #70 1,650 0 1
27 2019 26–19 57.8% #43 1,779 0 2 2018 17–16 51.5% #62 1,632 0 1
28 2020 11–11 50.0% #40 1,720 0 3 2019 26–23 53.1% #18 1,797 0 2
29 2021 16–16 50.0% #57 1,763 0 3 2020 6–8 42.9% #26 1,739 0 2
30 2022 23–22 51.1% #48 1,720 0 3 2021 16–15 51.6% #51 1,771 0 3
31 2023 24–24 50.0% #24 1,732 0 3 2022 25–21 54.3% #41 1,750 0 3
32 2024 27–25 51.9% #38 1,827 0 4 2023 0–8 0.0% #659 1,614 0 3
33 2025 19–24 44.2% #54 1,742 0 4
34 2026 18–14 56.2% #51 1,799 0 4