H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 07:16 UTC
Magda Linette vs Anastasija Sevastova H2H: 1-1
Magda Linette and Anastasija Sevastova are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Anastasija Sevastova won the 2025 Montreal second round 6-3 4-6 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
POL
Age 34
Right-Handed
171 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
LAT
Age 36
Right-Handed
169 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 30, 2025 | Montreal | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Anastasija Sevastova | 6-3 4-6 6-4 | Magda Linette | Match data |
| Jan 19, 2022* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Magda Linette | 6-4 7-5 | Anastasija Sevastova | Match data |
| Aug 19, 2016 | New Haven | WTA 500 | Q1 | Hard | Anastasija Sevastova | 6-3 3-6 5-3 | Magda Linette | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Magda Linette | #51 | #19 | 1,921 | 1,863 | 219 | 227 | 49.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Anastasija Sevastova | #293 | #11 | 3,366 | 1,946 | 207 | 175 | 54.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Magda Linette | Anastasija Sevastova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #261 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #79 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 22–15 | 59.5% | #45 | 1,718 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2013 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #123 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #98 | 1,628 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2014 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #133 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #184 | 1,610 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2015 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #90 | 1,577 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #148 | 1,622 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2016 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #96 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2017 | 17–23 | 42.5% | #72 | 1,728 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 5–3 | 62.5% | #113 | 1,654 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2018 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #81 | 1,589 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 22–19 | 53.7% | #34 | 1,715 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2019 | 26–19 | 57.8% | #43 | 1,779 | 0 | 2 | 2017 | 37–24 | 60.7% | #16 | 1,820 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2020 | 11–11 | 50.0% | #40 | 1,720 | 0 | 3 | 2018 | 42–21 | 66.7% | #11 | 1,909 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 2021 | 16–16 | 50.0% | #57 | 1,763 | 0 | 3 | 2019 | 27–21 | 56.2% | #27 | 1,759 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | 2022 | 23–22 | 51.1% | #48 | 1,720 | 0 | 3 | 2020 | 1–9 | 10.0% | #54 | 1,649 | 0 | 4 |
| 31 | 2023 | 24–24 | 50.0% | #24 | 1,732 | 0 | 3 | 2021 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #70 | 1,739 | 0 | 4 |
| 32 | 2024 | 27–25 | 51.9% | #38 | 1,827 | 0 | 4 | 2022 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #680 | 1,722 | 0 | 4 |
| 33 | 2025 | 19–24 | 44.2% | #54 | 1,742 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2026 | 18–14 | 56.2% | #51 | 1,799 | 0 | 4 | 2024 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #481 | 1,728 | 0 | 4 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #188 | 1,730 | 0 | 4 |