H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 10:32 UTC
Magda Linette vs Camila Osorio H2H: 1-1
Magda Linette and Camila Osorio are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Camila Osorio leads 1–0 on clay, while Magda Linette leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Magda Linette won the 2023 Merida third round 6-7(2) 7-5 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
POL
Age 34
Right-Handed
171 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
COL
Age 24
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 23, 2023* | Merida | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Magda Linette | 6-7(2) 7-5 6-2 | Camila Osorio | Match data |
| Apr 15, 2021* | Charleston 2 | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Camila Osorio | 6-3 4-6 7-5 | Magda Linette | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Magda Linette | #51 | #19 | 1,921 | 1,863 | 219 | 227 | 49.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Camila Osorio | #53 | #33 | 1,354 | 1,825 | 100 | 89 | 52.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Magda Linette | Camila Osorio | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #477 | 1,454 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #207 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 18–11 | 62.1% | #55 | 1,705 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #80 | 1,689 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2013 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #123 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 | 2023 | 17–15 | 53.1% | #78 | 1,733 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2014 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #133 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 | 2024 | 16–16 | 50.0% | #59 | 1,741 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2015 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #90 | 1,577 | 0 | 0 | 2025 | 20–17 | 54.1% | #77 | 1,716 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 2016 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #96 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 | 2026 | 13–12 | 52.0% | #53 | 1,793 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2017 | 17–23 | 42.5% | #72 | 1,728 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2018 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #81 | 1,589 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2019 | 26–19 | 57.8% | #43 | 1,779 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2020 | 11–11 | 50.0% | #40 | 1,720 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2021 | 16–16 | 50.0% | #57 | 1,763 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2022 | 23–22 | 51.1% | #48 | 1,720 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2023 | 24–24 | 50.0% | #24 | 1,732 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2024 | 27–25 | 51.9% | #38 | 1,827 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2025 | 19–24 | 44.2% | #54 | 1,742 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2026 | 18–14 | 56.2% | #51 | 1,799 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |