H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 22:32 UTC
Magda Linette vs Heather Watson H2H: 1-1
Magda Linette and Heather Watson are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Magda Linette leads 1–0 on clay, while Heather Watson leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Magda Linette won the 2022 Strasbourg fourth round 6-1 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
POL
Age 34
Right-Handed
171 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
GBR
Age 34
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 19, 2022* | Strasbourg | WTA 500 | R16 | Clay | Magda Linette | 6-1 6-1 | Heather Watson | Match data |
| Oct 12, 2019* | Tianjin | WTA 250 | QF | Hard | Heather Watson | 7-5 6-7(4) 7-6(6) | Magda Linette | Match data |
| Sep 28, 2019 | Beijing | WTA 1000 | Q2 | Hard | Magda Linette | 6-2 6-1 | Heather Watson | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Magda Linette | #51 | #19 | 1,921 | 1,863 | 219 | 227 | 49.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Heather Watson | #470 | #38 | 1,386 | 1,755 | 144 | 195 | 42.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Magda Linette | Heather Watson | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #176 | 1,472 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #92 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #49 | 1,690 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2013 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #123 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #121 | 1,550 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2014 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #133 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #49 | 1,555 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2015 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #90 | 1,577 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 18–19 | 48.6% | #55 | 1,614 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2016 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #96 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #76 | 1,584 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2017 | 17–23 | 42.5% | #72 | 1,728 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #73 | 1,626 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2018 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #81 | 1,589 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #91 | 1,584 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2019 | 26–19 | 57.8% | #43 | 1,779 | 0 | 2 | 2019 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #103 | 1,622 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 2020 | 11–11 | 50.0% | #40 | 1,720 | 0 | 3 | 2020 | 9–8 | 52.9% | #58 | 1,663 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | 2021 | 16–16 | 50.0% | #57 | 1,763 | 0 | 3 | 2021 | 7–16 | 30.4% | #72 | 1,590 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | 2022 | 23–22 | 51.1% | #48 | 1,720 | 0 | 3 | 2022 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #139 | 1,569 | 0 | 4 |
| 31 | 2023 | 24–24 | 50.0% | #24 | 1,732 | 0 | 3 | 2023 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #137 | 1,598 | 0 | 4 |
| 32 | 2024 | 27–25 | 51.9% | #38 | 1,827 | 0 | 4 | 2024 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #162 | 1,570 | 0 | 4 |
| 33 | 2025 | 19–24 | 44.2% | #54 | 1,742 | 0 | 4 | 2025 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #269 | 1,545 | 0 | 4 |
| 34 | 2026 | 18–14 | 56.2% | #51 | 1,799 | 0 | 4 | 2026 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #470 | 1,592 | 0 | 4 |