H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Magda Linette vs Lesia Tsurenko H2H: 2-2
Magda Linette and Lesia Tsurenko are tied 2–2 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Magda Linette leads 2–1 on hard courts, while Lesia Tsurenko leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Magda Linette won the 2024 Wuhan third round 5-2 RET.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
POL
Age 34
Right-Handed
171 cm / 5'7"
H2H
2
–
2
4 main draw meetings
UKR
Age 37
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 10, 2024* | Wuhan | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Magda Linette | 5-2 (ret.) | Lesia Tsurenko | Match data |
| Sep 19, 2024* | Hua Hin 2 | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Magda Linette | 6-2 7-5 | Lesia Tsurenko | Match data |
| Mar 21, 2024* | Miami | WTA 1000 | R128 | Hard | Lesia Tsurenko | 2-6 6-1 6-4 | Magda Linette | Match data |
| Jun 24, 2022* | Eastbourne | WTA 500 | R16 | Grass | Lesia Tsurenko | 7-5 3-6 7-5 | Magda Linette | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Magda Linette | #51 | #19 | 1,921 | 1,863 | 219 | 227 | 49.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Lesia Tsurenko | #370 | #23 | 2,030 | 1,889 | 180 | 200 | 47.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Magda Linette | Lesia Tsurenko | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #284 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2013 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #123 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #155 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2014 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #133 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #113 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2015 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #90 | 1,577 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #116 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2016 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #96 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #68 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2017 | 17–23 | 42.5% | #72 | 1,728 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #92 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2018 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #81 | 1,589 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #33 | 1,738 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2019 | 26–19 | 57.8% | #43 | 1,779 | 0 | 2 | 2016 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #57 | 1,728 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2020 | 11–11 | 50.0% | #40 | 1,720 | 0 | 3 | 2017 | 22–24 | 47.8% | #42 | 1,699 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 2021 | 16–16 | 50.0% | #57 | 1,763 | 0 | 3 | 2018 | 26–18 | 59.1% | #27 | 1,814 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | 2022 | 23–22 | 51.1% | #48 | 1,720 | 0 | 3 | 2019 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #73 | 1,734 | 0 | 4 |
| 31 | 2023 | 24–24 | 50.0% | #24 | 1,732 | 0 | 3 | 2020 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #146 | 1,746 | 0 | 4 |
| 32 | 2024 | 27–25 | 51.9% | #38 | 1,827 | 0 | 4 | 2021 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #118 | 1,738 | 0 | 4 |
| 33 | 2025 | 19–24 | 44.2% | #54 | 1,742 | 0 | 4 | 2022 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #137 | 1,745 | 0 | 4 |
| 34 | 2026 | 18–14 | 56.2% | #51 | 1,799 | 0 | 4 | 2023 | 24–15 | 61.5% | #31 | 1,866 | 0 | 4 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 10–20 | 33.3% | #115 | 1,693 | 0 | 4 |