H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 16:32 UTC
Magda Linette vs Lucie Hradecka H2H: 0-1
Lucie Hradecka holds a 1–0 lead over Magda Linette in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Lucie Hradecka leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Lucie Hradecka won the 2017 Prague third round 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
POL
Age 34
Right-Handed
171 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 41
Right-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 3, 2017* | Prague | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Lucie Hradecka | 6-3 6-4 | Magda Linette | Match data |
| Jan 8, 2016 | Sydney | WTA 500 | Q1 | Hard | Lucie Hradecka | 6-3 6-3 | Magda Linette | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Magda Linette | #51 | #19 | 1,921 | 1,863 | 219 | 227 | 49.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Lucie Hradecka | #1,142 | #41 | 1,271 | 1,726 | 92 | 120 | 43.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Magda Linette | Lucie Hradecka | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 21 | 2013 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #123 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #220 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2014 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #133 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #223 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2015 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #90 | 1,577 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #118 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2016 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #96 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 14–11 | 56.0% | #64 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2017 | 17–23 | 42.5% | #72 | 1,728 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 5–17 | 22.7% | #110 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2018 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #81 | 1,589 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 16–20 | 44.4% | #52 | 1,580 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2019 | 26–19 | 57.8% | #43 | 1,779 | 0 | 2 | 2012 | 18–17 | 51.4% | #46 | 1,653 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2020 | 11–11 | 50.0% | #40 | 1,720 | 0 | 3 | 2013 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #148 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2021 | 16–16 | 50.0% | #57 | 1,763 | 0 | 3 | 2014 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #154 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2022 | 23–22 | 51.1% | #48 | 1,720 | 0 | 3 | 2015 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #53 | 1,641 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2023 | 24–24 | 50.0% | #24 | 1,732 | 0 | 3 | 2016 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #166 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2024 | 27–25 | 51.9% | #38 | 1,827 | 0 | 4 | 2017 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #193 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | 2025 | 19–24 | 44.2% | #54 | 1,742 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2026 | 18–14 | 56.2% | #51 | 1,799 | 0 | 4 | 2019 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #302 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #567 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 |