H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 22:32 UTC
Magda Linette vs Mona Barthel H2H: 1-0
Magda Linette holds a 1–0 lead over Mona Barthel in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Magda Linette leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Magda Linette won the 2024 Prague third round 7-6(4) 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
POL
Age 34
Right-Handed
171 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
GER
Age 36
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 23, 2024* | Prague | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Magda Linette | 7-6(4) 6-4 | Mona Barthel | Match data |
| Dec 31, 2016 | Auckland | WTA 250 | Q1 | Hard | Mona Barthel | 6-2 4-6 6-4 | Magda Linette | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Magda Linette | #51 | #19 | 1,921 | 1,863 | 219 | 227 | 49.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Mona Barthel | #223 | #23 | 1,762 | 1,841 | 151 | 179 | 45.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Magda Linette | Mona Barthel | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #195 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #69 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2013 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #123 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #39 | 1,682 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2014 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #133 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 24–22 | 52.2% | #34 | 1,646 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2015 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #90 | 1,577 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 23–23 | 50.0% | #42 | 1,712 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 2016 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #96 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 24–26 | 48.0% | #45 | 1,672 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2017 | 17–23 | 42.5% | #72 | 1,728 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #158 | 1,555 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2018 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #81 | 1,589 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #48 | 1,600 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | 2019 | 26–19 | 57.8% | #43 | 1,779 | 0 | 2 | 2018 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #77 | 1,625 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | 2020 | 11–11 | 50.0% | #40 | 1,720 | 0 | 3 | 2019 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #183 | 1,552 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | 2021 | 16–16 | 50.0% | #57 | 1,763 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2022 | 23–22 | 51.1% | #48 | 1,720 | 0 | 3 | 2021 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #275 | 1,458 | 0 | 4 |
| 31 | 2023 | 24–24 | 50.0% | #24 | 1,732 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2024 | 27–25 | 51.9% | #38 | 1,827 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2025 | 19–24 | 44.2% | #54 | 1,742 | 0 | 4 | 2024 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #171 | 1,525 | 0 | 4 |
| 34 | 2026 | 18–14 | 56.2% | #51 | 1,799 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #223 | 1,535 | 0 | 4 |