H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Magda Linette vs Sara Sorribes Tormo H2H: 0-2
Sara Sorribes Tormo holds a 2–0 lead over Magda Linette in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Sara Sorribes Tormo leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Sara Sorribes Tormo won the 2020 Ostrava third round 6-1 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
POL
Age 34
Right-Handed
171 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 29
Right-Handed
176 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 22, 2020* | Ostrava | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Sara Sorribes Tormo | 6-1 6-3 | Magda Linette | Match data |
| Sep 21, 2018 | Wuhan | WTA 1000 | Q1 | Hard | Sara Sorribes Tormo | 4-6 6-2 6-3 | Magda Linette | Match data |
| Apr 14, 2017* | Bogota | WTA 250 | QF | Clay | Sara Sorribes Tormo | 6-4 4-6 7-6(5) | Magda Linette | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Magda Linette | #51 | #19 | 1,921 | 1,863 | 219 | 227 | 49.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Sara Sorribes Tormo | #212 | #32 | 1,760 | 1,857 | 144 | 145 | 49.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Magda Linette | Sara Sorribes Tormo | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #181 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #107 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #104 | 1,594 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2013 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #123 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #86 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2014 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #133 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #84 | 1,643 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2015 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #90 | 1,577 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #66 | 1,679 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2016 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #96 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 31–18 | 63.3% | #36 | 1,774 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2017 | 17–23 | 42.5% | #72 | 1,728 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #61 | 1,738 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2018 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #81 | 1,589 | 0 | 0 | 2023 | 19–9 | 67.9% | #48 | 1,789 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2019 | 26–19 | 57.8% | #43 | 1,779 | 0 | 2 | 2024 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #106 | 1,710 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2020 | 11–11 | 50.0% | #40 | 1,720 | 0 | 3 | 2025 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #290 | 1,618 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2021 | 16–16 | 50.0% | #57 | 1,763 | 0 | 3 | 2026 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #212 | 1,651 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 2022 | 23–22 | 51.1% | #48 | 1,720 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2023 | 24–24 | 50.0% | #24 | 1,732 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2024 | 27–25 | 51.9% | #38 | 1,827 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2025 | 19–24 | 44.2% | #54 | 1,742 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2026 | 18–14 | 56.2% | #51 | 1,799 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |