H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Magda Linette vs Shuai Peng H2H: 2-0

Magda Linette holds a 2–0 lead over Shuai Peng in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Magda Linette leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Magda Linette won the 2020 Hua Hin second round 7-5 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Magda Linette
Poland Age 34 Right-Handed 171 cm / 5'7"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main-draw meetings
Shuai Peng
CHN Age 40 Right-Handed 177 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Magda Linette #42 7-5 6-1 Shuai Peng #106 Match data Feb 14, 2020* R16 Hua Hin International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard
Magda Linette #93 5-2 (ret.) Shuai Peng #49 Match data Mar 3, 2017* R16 Kuala Lumpur International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Magda Linette #82 #19 1,921 1,863 221 234 48.6% 0 0 0 0 4 4
Shuai Peng #820 #14 2,825 1,907 301 263 53.4% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Magda Linette Shuai Peng
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 2001 0–1 0.0% #518 1,493 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 2002 0–1 0.0% #366 1,484 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 2003 0–2 0.0% #221 1,455 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 2004 5–4 55.6% #80 1,516 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 2005 20–16 55.6% #36 1,680 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 2006 18–17 51.4% #55 1,729 0 0
21 2013 4–2 66.7% #123 1,535 0 0 2007 19–17 52.8% #45 1,738 0 0
22 2014 2–4 33.3% #133 1,517 0 0 2008 25–23 52.1% #40 1,707 0 0
23 2015 9–11 45.0% #90 1,576 0 0 2009 23–22 51.1% #46 1,773 0 0
24 2016 10–16 38.5% #96 1,583 0 0 2010 15–13 53.6% #72 1,760 0 0
25 2017 17–23 42.5% #72 1,727 0 0 2011 48–23 67.6% #17 1,840 0 0
26 2018 15–18 45.5% #81 1,601 0 0 2012 22–23 48.9% #40 1,707 0 0
27 2019 24–18 57.1% #43 1,781 0 2 2013 18–18 50.0% #42 1,656 0 0
28 2020 11–11 50.0% #40 1,722 0 3 2014 28–22 56.0% #21 1,746 0 0
29 2021 16–17 48.5% #57 1,763 0 3 2015 6–7 46.2% #137 1,701 0 0
30 2022 23–22 51.1% #48 1,719 0 3 2016 8–11 42.1% #84 1,660 0 1
31 2023 24–24 50.0% #24 1,732 0 3 2017 36–22 62.1% #27 1,794 0 2
32 2024 28–26 51.9% #38 1,830 0 4 2018 1–9 10.0% #125 1,723 0 2
33 2025 19–24 44.2% #54 1,742 0 4 2019 7–9 43.8% #109 1,670 0 2
34 2026 19–18 51.4% #82 1,743 0 4 2020 2–3 40.0% #117 1,627 0 2

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Magda Linette Shuai Peng
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 13 9 22 59.1% 7 6 13 53.8% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 6 9 15 40.0% 9 6 15 60.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
21 2013 3 1 4 75.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2007 14 13 27 51.9% 5 3 8 62.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
22 2014 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 19 16 35 54.3% 4 5 9 44.4% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
23 2015 8 8 16 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2009 17 14 31 54.8% 5 7 12 41.7% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
24 2016 10 12 22 45.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 2010 6 8 14 42.9% 9 5 14 64.3% — — — — — — — —
25 2017 10 15 25 40.0% 6 5 11 54.5% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2011 32 15 47 68.1% 10 5 15 66.7% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — —
26 2018 13 11 24 54.2% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2012 16 16 32 50.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
27 2019 20 11 31 64.5% 2 5 7 28.6% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2013 10 12 22 45.5% 7 5 12 58.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
28 2020 9 8 17 52.9% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — 2014 19 13 32 59.4% 6 7 13 46.2% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
29 2021 9 10 19 47.4% 5 6 11 45.5% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 2015 6 5 11 54.5% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
30 2022 13 14 27 48.1% 6 4 10 60.0% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — 2016 8 7 15 53.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
31 2023 16 16 32 50.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 2017 29 16 45 64.4% 3 4 7 42.9% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
32 2024 11 16 27 40.7% 16 7 23 69.6% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2018 0 4 4 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
33 2025 13 17 30 43.3% 3 4 7 42.9% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 2019 7 9 16 43.8% — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2026 13 13 26 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2020 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 150 156 306 49.0% 50 50 100 50.0% 21 28 49 42.9% — — — — — 209 176 385 54.3% 68 64 132 51.5% 24 21 45 53.3% 0 2 2 0.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 421/457 of Magda Linette's and 451/553 of Shuai Peng's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Magda Linette Shuai Peng
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2005 5/36 2.6 2.6 61.4% 60.8% 37.6% 50.9% 53.6% 53.2% 54.0%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 19/35 2.0 2.5 64.1% 56.9% 41.5% 48.6% 49.0% 51.0% 42.0%
21 2013 4/6 0.5 1.8 72.3% 53.8% 53.4% 29.2% 46.4% 54.1% 42.2% 2007 30/36 2.7 1.5 65.5% 61.9% 52.3% 56.6% 43.5% 58.3% 45.5%
22 2014 4/6 3.8 4.8 57.4% 64.6% 42.5% 71.4% 31.7% 55.7% 43.7% 2008 34/48 2.1 2.1 68.0% 60.8% 48.5% 49.1% 48.0% 56.8% 47.4%
23 2015 10/20 2.3 3.3 63.7% 62.2% 50.9% 51.9% 48.3% 58.0% 40.1% 2009 42/45 1.6 1.9 67.7% 60.9% 47.4% 48.7% 47.7% 56.5% 44.5%
24 2016 25/26 2.2 3.5 62.7% 62.0% 44.8% 47.4% 37.4% 55.3% 39.1% 2010 24/28 1.0 1.7 70.1% 61.3% 50.6% 44.9% 43.8% 58.0% 44.3%
25 2017 40/40 2.6 2.5 67.9% 63.5% 46.3% 43.8% 40.5% 57.7% 41.5% 2011 65/71 2.3 1.8 68.3% 66.5% 48.1% 53.5% 47.4% 60.5% 45.7%
26 2018 30/33 2.3 3.8 63.5% 62.1% 46.1% 50.1% 47.8% 55.9% 42.4% 2012 40/45 2.8 2.3 66.8% 64.1% 47.3% 44.4% 52.1% 58.4% 42.4%
27 2019 40/42 4.0 2.9 57.0% 66.2% 48.4% 55.6% 51.6% 58.7% 43.3% 2013 35/36 2.1 2.6 65.1% 62.3% 44.6% 52.6% 47.6% 55.9% 44.7%
28 2020 22/22 2.4 3.2 60.8% 65.8% 44.0% 49.4% 45.6% 57.5% 41.2% 2014 43/50 2.7 2.4 63.3% 64.2% 46.5% 53.4% 53.6% 57.5% 42.3%
29 2021 31/33 3.5 3.0 62.0% 68.2% 45.1% 51.6% 51.1% 59.3% 43.5% 2015 13/13 3.0 3.2 63.2% 59.9% 44.5% 44.8% 38.1% 54.2% 41.2%
30 2022 45/45 3.5 2.6 63.9% 65.5% 49.5% 52.4% 42.2% 59.7% 42.8% 2016 14/21 2.0 1.8 61.4% 60.2% 45.4% 54.0% 45.8% 54.7% 36.8%
31 2023 48/49 2.5 1.8 67.0% 62.0% 48.8% 45.6% 46.1% 57.4% 41.6% 2017 57/58 1.7 2.2 63.7% 63.7% 47.7% 55.3% 49.4% 57.8% 47.0%
32 2024 52/54 3.3 1.9 61.7% 65.2% 47.9% 58.0% 46.4% 58.4% 41.7% 2018 9/10 1.8 2.9 63.8% 60.8% 46.5% 57.7% 47.4% 56.2% 33.5%
33 2025 36/44 3.8 2.4 59.8% 63.1% 45.8% 55.3% 42.3% 55.8% 39.6% 2019 16/16 1.6 2.1 67.6% 62.3% 44.1% 51.6% 41.3% 56.1% 43.6%
34 2026 34/37 3.3 2.1 57.6% 63.9% 46.1% 43.9% 40.4% 56.3% 39.6% 2020 5/5 1.2 1.4 71.8% 63.2% 52.9% 53.4% 56.9% 60.0% 43.9%
Career — 421/457 3.1 2.6 62.4% 64.2% 47.1% 50.6% 44.8% 57.6% 41.6% — 451/566 2.1 2.1 66.0% 62.7% 47.2% 51.4% 48.0% 57.3% 44.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Magda Linette Shuai Peng
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 1494 102.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.19
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1485 102.4 — — — — — — — 33.3% -0.67 0–1 — — -0.02
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 1455 96.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.25 — — — +0.22
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 1516 114.6 — — — — +25 — — 50.0% +0.60 2–0 — — +0.25
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1680 142.9 -0.36 +4.21 1.154 53.6% -27 -58 — 56.8% +0.53 2–6 (25%) 3–5 (38%) 95.0 +0.12
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1729 119.5 -2.95 -1.68 0.858 46.7% -74 -31 -96 53.5% -0.15 5–4 (56%) 2–1 (67%) 103.6 -0.81
21 2013 1536 102.2 -1.11 -2.42 0.920 48.0% +21 — — 54.5% +0.09 1–0 1–0 — +0.79 2007 1738 140.7 +2.26 +2.00 1.092 51.8% -34 +14 — 53.2% +0.52 5–6 (45%) 2–3 (40%) 98.4 -0.16
22 2014 1518 109.9 -1.03 -1.10 0.986 49.6% +15 — — 42.9% -0.14 0–2 — — +0.11 2008 1707 128.9 +0.94 +2.05 1.097 52.0% -3 -20 -79 53.3% +0.38 4–11 (27%) 7–3 (70%) 97.0 +1.57
23 2015 1576 118.7 -0.76 -1.01 0.955 49.2% +15 — +23 50.0% -0.26 3–5 (38%) 5–2 (71%) 101.4 -0.29 2009 1773 142.5 +1.21 +1.78 1.022 50.6% +16 -138 — 52.0% +0.22 7–9 (44%) 6–3 (67%) 101.4 -1.70
24 2016 1583 116.6 -0.13 -2.61 0.875 48.3% +3 — -35 36.2% -1.00 5–3 (63%) 4–3 (57%) 104.7 -0.02 2010 1760 128.8 +1.83 +0.38 1.056 51.1% +2 -76 — 51.6% +0.14 7–7 (50%) 2–3 (40%) 97.6 -1.67
25 2017 1728 126.9 +1.02 -1.27 0.983 49.5% +21 -159 -224 44.6% -0.31 6–9 (40%) 4–2 (67%) 101.3 +0.07 2011 1840 146.6 +4.59 +2.04 1.157 53.1% +11 -74 -116 64.2% +1.13 18–8 (69%) 7–9 (44%) 105.6 +1.38
26 2018 1601 117.5 -0.12 -0.67 0.960 49.1% +33 -43 — 46.2% -0.27 6–6 (50%) 3–5 (38%) 97.4 +0.76 2012 1708 129.2 +1.71 -0.73 1.018 50.2% +13 +6 +50 52.0% +0.11 8–8 (50%) 5–5 (50%) 96.7 +1.22
27 2019 1782 135.1 +1.80 +0.35 1.048 51.1% +25 -283 -262 53.6% +0.20 9–6 (60%) 11–6 (65%) 108.4 -0.23 2013 1656 128.2 +0.33 +0.95 1.015 50.5% -3 +77 — 50.6% +0.07 7–5 (58%) 3–3 (50%) 99.6 -0.24
28 2020 1723 127.0 +0.87 -1.08 0.968 49.2% +28 -204 — 50.0% +0.06 3–3 (50%) 3–2 (60%) 98.1 +0.72 2014 1747 135.0 +1.13 -0.79 0.996 50.1% -12 -53 +25 57.1% +0.46 7–6 (54%) 5–6 (45%) 99.7 +0.27
29 2021 1764 135.6 +2.54 +1.11 1.068 51.3% -9 -174 -225 52.7% 0.00 3–11 (21%) 4–1 (80%) 95.7 -1.54 2015 1701 126.5 -2.49 +0.54 0.900 47.6% +36 — — 53.6% -0.04 1–3 (25%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.02
30 2022 1719 132.3 +2.26 -0.34 1.061 50.9% +7 -34 -131 49.5% +0.06 8–7 (53%) 10–6 (63%) 105.0 +0.37 2016 1660 114.8 +0.32 -3.37 0.812 46.4% +54 — +28 41.5% -0.78 2–5 (29%) 3–4 (43%) 95.6 +0.09
31 2023 1732 137.3 +0.60 -0.62 0.977 49.5% +15 -77 -90 46.8% -0.20 10–7 (59%) 6–10 (38%) 101.1 -0.04 2017 1794 144.9 +1.43 +3.25 1.114 52.3% +9 -153 -47 59.8% +0.67 9–7 (56%) 9–6 (60%) 102.1 -1.14
32 2024 1830 141.2 +1.60 -0.83 1.002 50.2% -97 +38 -210 52.8% +0.07 9–12 (43%) 9–6 (60%) 100.0 -1.33 2018 1724 109.2 -0.92 -4.14 0.764 45.6% +31 -67 — 21.7% -1.91 0–3 (0%) — — -0.14
33 2025 1742 140.4 -0.56 -2.21 0.896 47.9% -16 +96 -155 44.8% -0.53 6–5 (55%) 7–2 (78%) 107.1 +0.26 2019 1670 122.1 -0.89 +0.34 0.993 49.8% +20 — — 51.4% -0.34 1–4 (20%) 4–1 (80%) 97.5 +0.01
34 2026 1743 135.6 -0.18 -1.88 0.907 48.0% -30 +88 -68 45.6% -0.20 13–3 (81%) 3–4 (43%) 108.6 -0.01 2020 1627 111.9 +1.00 -0.04 1.097 52.2% +20 — — 41.7% 0.00 1–1 0–2 — +0.30
Career — 1863 136.6 +0.89 -0.87 0.980 49.6% -1 -62 -137 48.0% -0.17 82–79 (51%) 70–49 (59%) 109.8 -0.08 — 1908 141.0 +1.33 +0.93 1.037 50.8% +2 -48 -41 53.9% +0.30 86–94 (48%) 60–55 (52%) 98.4 -0.11

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.