H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Magda Linette vs Venus Williams H2H: 1-1

Magda Linette and Venus Williams are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Magda Linette won the 2026 ASB Classic first round 6-4 4-6 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Magda Linette
Poland Age 34 Right-Handed 171 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main-draw meetings
Venus Williams
United States Age 46 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Magda Linette #54 6-4 4-6 6-2 Venus Williams Match data Jan 6, 2026 R32 ASB Classic WTA 250 Hard
Venus Williams #7 6-3 6-7(6) 6-2 Magda Linette #87 Match data Jul 22, 2016* R16 Stanford Premier → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS Olympics 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Magda Linette #82 #19 1,921 1,863 221 234 48.6% 0 0 0 0 0 4 4
Venus Williams #469 #1 7,452 2,368 782 299 72.3% 7 1 9 2 19 11 49

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Magda Linette Venus Williams
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 1994 1–1 50.0% — 1,525 0 0
15 — — — — — — — 1995 2–3 40.0% #205 1,561 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1996 2–5 28.6% #216 1,570 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1997 20–13 60.6% #22 1,830 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1998 51–13 79.7% #5 2,099 0 3
19 — — — — — — — 1999 57–12 82.6% #3 2,248 0 9
20 — — — — — — — 2000 41–4 91.1% #3 2,337 2 15
21 2013 4–2 66.7% #123 1,535 0 0 2001 46–6 88.5% #3 2,358 4 21
22 2014 2–4 33.3% #133 1,517 0 0 2002 63–9 87.5% #2 2,303 4 28
23 2015 9–11 45.0% #90 1,576 0 0 2003 24–5 82.8% #11 2,260 4 29
24 2016 10–16 38.5% #96 1,583 0 0 2004 42–14 75.0% #9 2,077 4 31
25 2017 17–23 42.5% #72 1,727 0 0 2005 34–10 77.3% #10 2,128 5 33
26 2018 15–18 45.5% #81 1,601 0 0 2006 13–6 68.4% #46 2,035 5 33
27 2019 24–18 57.1% #43 1,781 0 2 2007 46–10 82.1% #8 2,059 6 36
28 2020 11–11 50.0% #40 1,722 0 3 2008 40–11 78.4% #6 2,138 7 39
29 2021 16–17 48.5% #57 1,763 0 3 2009 38–16 70.4% #6 1,988 7 41
30 2022 23–22 51.1% #48 1,719 0 3 2010 38–7 84.4% #5 2,061 7 43
31 2023 24–24 50.0% #24 1,732 0 3 2011 8–4 66.7% #102 2,017 7 43
32 2024 28–26 51.9% #38 1,830 0 4 2012 24–9 72.7% #24 2,016 7 44
33 2025 19–24 44.2% #54 1,742 0 4 2013 15–11 57.7% #47 1,910 7 44
34 2026 19–18 51.4% #82 1,743 0 4 2014 33–15 68.8% #18 1,888 7 45
35 — — — — — — — 2015 39–14 73.6% #7 1,971 7 48
36 — — — — — — — 2016 24–15 61.5% #17 1,817 7 49
37 — — — — — — — 2017 38–15 71.7% #5 1,941 7 49
38 — — — — — — — 2018 15–11 57.7% #39 1,872 7 49
39 — — — — — — — 2019 20–15 57.1% #52 1,819 7 49
40 — — — — — — — 2020 1–8 11.1% #79 1,713 7 49
41 — — — — — — — 2021 3–9 25.0% #318 1,647 7 49
42 — — — — — — — 2022 0–4 0.0% #1000 1,602 7 49
43 — — — — — — — 2023 3–7 30.0% #412 1,592 7 49

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Magda Linette Venus Williams
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 — — — — — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2 1 3 66.7%
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 15 7 22 68.2% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0%
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 36 8 44 81.8% 9 2 11 81.8% 4 2 6 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7%
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 34 6 40 85.0% 12 2 14 85.7% 4 1 5 80.0% 7 3 10 70.0%
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 25 0 25 100.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 7 0 7 100.0% 3 1 4 75.0%
21 2013 3 1 4 75.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2001 32 3 35 91.4% 5 2 7 71.4% 7 0 7 100.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
22 2014 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 35 5 40 87.5% 14 2 16 87.5% 6 1 7 85.7% 8 1 9 88.9%
23 2015 8 8 16 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2003 8 2 10 80.0% 6 2 8 75.0% 6 1 7 85.7% 4 0 4 100.0%
24 2016 10 12 22 45.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 2004 21 9 30 70.0% 17 2 19 89.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
25 2017 10 15 25 40.0% 6 5 11 54.5% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2005 18 7 25 72.0% 9 3 12 75.0% 7 0 7 100.0% — — — —
26 2018 13 11 24 54.2% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2006 1 2 3 33.3% 10 3 13 76.9% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
27 2019 20 11 31 64.5% 2 5 7 28.6% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2007 27 5 32 84.4% 12 5 17 70.6% 7 0 7 100.0% — — — —
28 2020 9 8 17 52.9% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — 2008 29 9 38 76.3% 4 2 6 66.7% 7 0 7 100.0% — — — —
29 2021 9 10 19 47.4% 5 6 11 45.5% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 2009 21 11 32 65.6% 11 4 15 73.3% 6 1 7 85.7% — — — —
30 2022 13 14 27 48.1% 6 4 10 60.0% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — 2010 19 3 22 86.4% 15 3 18 83.3% 4 1 5 80.0% — — — —
31 2023 16 16 32 50.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 2011 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 5 2 7 71.4% — — — —
32 2024 11 16 27 40.7% 16 7 23 69.6% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2012 14 3 17 82.4% 8 4 12 66.7% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
33 2025 13 17 30 43.3% 3 4 7 42.9% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 2013 12 8 20 60.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — —
34 2026 13 13 26 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2014 27 11 38 71.1% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 34 10 44 77.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — —
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 14 11 25 56.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 5 1 6 83.3% — — — —
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 26 11 37 70.3% 6 3 9 66.7% 6 1 7 85.7% — — — —
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 12 7 19 63.2% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 16 11 27 59.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
40 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1 6 7 14.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
41 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 2 4 6 33.3% 0 4 4 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
42 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
43 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
Career — 150 156 306 49.0% 50 50 100 50.0% 21 28 49 42.9% — — — — — 487 189 676 72.0% 163 69 232 70.3% 98 27 125 78.4% 34 14 48 70.8%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 421/457 of Magda Linette's and 581/732 of Venus Williams's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Magda Linette Venus Williams
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
21 2013 4/6 0.5 1.8 72.3% 53.8% 53.4% 29.2% 46.4% 54.1% 42.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2014 4/6 3.8 4.8 57.4% 64.6% 42.5% 71.4% 31.7% 55.7% 43.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 2015 10/20 2.3 3.3 63.7% 62.2% 50.9% 51.9% 48.3% 58.0% 40.1% 2003 11/29 3.8 5.8 55.2% 76.2% 43.8% 53.3% 47.0% 61.6% 51.3%
24 2016 25/26 2.2 3.5 62.7% 62.0% 44.8% 47.4% 37.4% 55.3% 39.1% 2004 13/56 4.1 4.5 59.4% 72.2% 46.7% 41.6% 50.5% 61.9% 50.1%
25 2017 40/40 2.6 2.5 67.9% 63.5% 46.3% 43.8% 40.5% 57.7% 41.5% 2005 18/44 2.9 4.2 64.4% 70.7% 45.1% 63.1% 52.0% 61.3% 50.1%
26 2018 30/33 2.3 3.8 63.5% 62.1% 46.1% 50.1% 47.8% 55.9% 42.4% 2006 16/19 3.1 4.3 62.7% 68.3% 47.0% 52.8% 45.6% 60.6% 48.5%
27 2019 40/42 4.0 2.9 57.0% 66.2% 48.4% 55.6% 51.6% 58.7% 43.3% 2007 53/56 3.6 5.3 59.4% 72.6% 46.6% 56.6% 51.8% 62.2% 48.6%
28 2020 22/22 2.4 3.2 60.8% 65.8% 44.0% 49.4% 45.6% 57.5% 41.2% 2008 43/51 4.3 4.3 61.6% 72.0% 48.4% 55.6% 48.9% 62.7% 47.0%
29 2021 31/33 3.5 3.0 62.0% 68.2% 45.1% 51.6% 51.1% 59.3% 43.5% 2009 48/54 5.4 4.7 57.3% 73.4% 49.9% 59.5% 51.4% 63.3% 46.1%
30 2022 45/45 3.5 2.6 63.9% 65.5% 49.5% 52.4% 42.2% 59.7% 42.8% 2010 44/45 4.6 4.5 56.7% 73.5% 46.9% 53.7% 49.0% 61.9% 47.4%
31 2023 48/49 2.5 1.8 67.0% 62.0% 48.8% 45.6% 46.1% 57.4% 41.6% 2011 9/12 6.0 2.8 64.4% 72.3% 51.7% 60.3% 45.5% 64.5% 45.7%
32 2024 52/54 3.3 1.9 61.7% 65.2% 47.9% 58.0% 46.4% 58.4% 41.7% 2012 28/33 4.5 4.8 53.9% 68.9% 47.8% 50.7% 50.7% 59.2% 46.0%
33 2025 36/44 3.8 2.4 59.8% 63.1% 45.8% 55.3% 42.3% 55.8% 39.6% 2013 23/26 2.8 4.6 56.9% 65.4% 43.4% 55.0% 50.8% 56.0% 47.2%
34 2026 34/37 3.3 2.1 57.6% 63.9% 46.1% 43.9% 40.4% 56.3% 39.6% 2014 44/48 4.7 4.4 55.7% 71.6% 46.0% 56.6% 53.0% 60.4% 46.7%
35 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2015 35/53 4.6 2.9 58.6% 70.6% 49.7% 50.2% 48.0% 62.1% 45.0%
36 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2016 37/39 3.1 3.9 61.5% 65.5% 48.1% 52.8% 52.7% 58.4% 46.8%
37 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2017 46/53 3.5 5.2 60.9% 69.2% 46.3% 59.1% 46.0% 60.2% 46.0%
38 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2018 26/26 2.1 4.9 60.5% 63.9% 46.4% 53.6% 51.3% 56.7% 43.8%
39 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2019 34/35 1.8 3.7 63.2% 63.3% 43.3% 54.0% 45.9% 56.0% 43.6%
40 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2020 9/9 3.2 7.0 58.3% 63.2% 42.3% 61.2% 45.9% 54.5% 41.2%
41 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2021 12/12 3.4 4.4 62.1% 60.7% 37.2% 48.3% 44.1% 51.7% 39.2%
42 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2022 4/4 3.3 8.5 56.5% 65.1% 31.3% 49.0% 29.6% 50.4% 34.9%
43 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2023 10/10 3.6 4.4 60.1% 64.2% 38.7% 43.3% 39.2% 54.0% 40.5%
44 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2024 2/2 4.5 8.0 59.1% 60.9% 29.6% 49.4% 70.0% 47.9% 40.9%
45 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2025 4/4 3.5 5.5 54.2% 62.5% 31.3% 31.2% 48.2% 48.5% 40.7%
46 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2026 12/12 3.0 4.4 59.2% 63.3% 37.8% 46.5% 43.3% 53.3% 37.0%
Career — 421/457 3.1 2.6 62.4% 64.2% 47.1% 50.6% 44.8% 57.6% 41.6% — 581/1,081 3.8 4.5 59.3% 69.4% 46.1% 54.4% 49.2% 59.8% 46.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Magda Linette Venus Williams
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1526 122.1 — — — — — — — 60.0% 0.00 0–1 — — -0.18
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1561 123.9 — — — — +29 — — 36.4% -0.36 1–0 0–1 — -0.31
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1570 134.2 — — — — +31 — — 46.7% +0.47 1–2 (33%) 1–0 — -0.34
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 1831 160.2 — — — — +5 -255 -230 55.8% +0.44 8–5 (62%) 4–3 (57%) 108.3 -1.92
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 2100 174.0 — — — — +4 -331 -385 75.6% +2.04 9–4 (69%) 4–3 (57%) 108.8 -0.82
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 2248 179.2 — — — — +7 -300 -461 77.5% +1.83 10–5 (67%) 9–4 (69%) 105.8 -4.08
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 2337 171.5 — — — — +16 -397 -317 84.0% +2.34 8–2 (80%) 6–3 (67%) 106.2 -2.30
21 2013 1536 102.2 -1.11 -2.42 0.920 48.0% +21 — — 54.5% +0.09 1–0 1–0 — +0.79 2001 2358 172.4 — — — — +31 -379 -127 83.8% +2.48 8–1 (89%) 10–3 (77%) 106.1 -1.53
22 2014 1518 109.9 -1.03 -1.10 0.986 49.6% +15 — — 42.9% -0.14 0–2 — — +0.11 2002 2303 175.2 — — — — +58 -205 -10 81.3% +2.44 12–4 (75%) 7–3 (70%) 101.1 -2.34
23 2015 1576 118.7 -0.76 -1.01 0.955 49.2% +15 — +23 50.0% -0.26 3–5 (38%) 5–2 (71%) 101.4 -0.29 2003 2261 155.8 +4.06 +5.13 1.337 56.1% +107 -163 +33 81.0% +2.37 4–3 (57%) 1–2 (33%) 97.7 -1.73
24 2016 1583 116.6 -0.13 -2.61 0.875 48.3% +3 — -35 36.2% -1.00 5–3 (63%) 4–3 (57%) 104.7 -0.02 2004 2078 159.0 +4.27 +3.93 1.315 55.7% +59 +131 — 75.7% +1.99 6–3 (67%) 8–6 (57%) 99.4 +0.68
25 2017 1728 126.9 +1.02 -1.27 0.983 49.5% +21 -159 -224 44.6% -0.31 6–9 (40%) 4–2 (67%) 101.3 +0.07 2005 2128 165.4 +4.52 +4.90 1.293 55.5% +29 +38 +223 75.0% +2.03 6–4 (60%) 7–2 (78%) 102.9 -2.36
26 2018 1601 117.5 -0.12 -0.67 0.960 49.1% +33 -43 — 46.2% -0.27 6–6 (50%) 3–5 (38%) 97.4 +0.76 2006 2035 136.6 +3.30 +3.85 1.231 54.0% +67 +87 +280 63.8% +0.94 5–4 (56%) 3–2 (60%) 97.6 -0.08
27 2019 1782 135.1 +1.80 +0.35 1.048 51.1% +25 -283 -262 53.6% +0.20 9–6 (60%) 11–6 (65%) 108.4 -0.23 2007 2059 153.9 +5.55 +3.98 1.286 55.2% +31 +23 +331 79.0% +2.10 6–6 (50%) 6–5 (55%) 95.6 -1.59
28 2020 1723 127.0 +0.87 -1.08 0.968 49.2% +28 -204 — 50.0% +0.06 3–3 (50%) 3–2 (60%) 98.1 +0.72 2008 2138 163.5 +7.00 +3.95 1.260 54.6% -5 -109 +293 74.6% +1.81 7–5 (58%) 5–6 (45%) 99.1 -1.46
29 2021 1764 135.6 +2.54 +1.11 1.068 51.3% -9 -174 -225 52.7% 0.00 3–11 (21%) 4–1 (80%) 95.7 -1.54 2009 1989 162.7 +7.24 +2.88 1.255 54.5% +47 -3 +361 65.1% +1.53 13–10 (57%) 3–12 (20%) 88.0 -2.55
30 2022 1719 132.3 +2.26 -0.34 1.061 50.9% +7 -34 -131 49.5% +0.06 8–7 (53%) 10–6 (63%) 105.0 +0.37 2010 2062 156.7 +5.33 +3.88 1.244 54.7% +31 -11 +294 79.6% +1.80 6–2 (75%) 5–2 (71%) 104.0 +0.82
31 2023 1732 137.3 +0.60 -0.62 0.977 49.5% +15 -77 -90 46.8% -0.20 10–7 (59%) 6–10 (38%) 101.1 -0.04 2011 2018 120.4 +4.82 +1.85 1.287 54.7% +52 — +278 70.8% +1.58 3–1 (75%) 0–2 — +0.19
32 2024 1830 141.2 +1.60 -0.83 1.002 50.2% -97 +38 -210 52.8% +0.07 9–12 (43%) 9–6 (60%) 100.0 -1.33 2012 2016 150.4 +3.65 +3.04 1.127 52.6% +82 +19 +154 65.4% +1.15 9–3 (75%) 5–5 (50%) 99.5 -1.94
33 2025 1742 140.4 -0.56 -2.21 0.896 47.9% -16 +96 -155 44.8% -0.53 6–5 (55%) 7–2 (78%) 107.1 +0.26 2013 1911 141.0 +0.75 +3.14 1.071 51.5% +85 +50 — 58.1% +0.65 6–6 (50%) 2–4 (33%) 92.5 -0.63
34 2026 1743 135.6 -0.18 -1.88 0.907 48.0% -30 +88 -68 45.6% -0.20 13–3 (81%) 3–4 (43%) 108.6 -0.01 2014 1888 149.7 +4.15 +2.82 1.178 53.5% +57 +2 +268 66.4% +1.21 10–11 (48%) 5–6 (45%) 93.1 +0.59
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 1971 157.4 +3.80 +3.44 1.187 53.2% +43 -131 +141 67.2% +1.27 13–4 (76%) 10–5 (67%) 105.5 -0.59
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 1818 133.2 +2.07 +3.27 1.126 52.8% +13 +15 +295 62.0% +0.67 5–9 (36%) 11–4 (73%) 95.7 +1.30
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1941 149.8 +3.49 +3.26 1.155 53.0% -13 -79 +233 67.8% +1.01 11–6 (65%) 11–3 (79%) 106.7 -0.36
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1873 141.1 +0.84 +1.05 1.013 50.4% +44 -80 +237 54.0% +0.33 7–4 (64%) 3–3 (50%) 98.9 +0.67
39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1820 145.6 +0.36 +1.07 0.992 50.0% +35 -40 +249 51.9% +0.05 9–4 (69%) 6–3 (67%) 103.1 -1.42
40 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1714 126.0 +0.01 -0.68 0.905 48.2% +47 — — 27.3% -1.14 0–4 (0%) 0–3 (0%) 90.8 -1.11
41 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1647 111.7 -2.68 -2.16 0.811 45.9% +79 -9 — 29.6% -1.59 1–2 (33%) 0–2 — -0.85
42 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 1602 107.5 -2.82 -1.21 0.703 43.0% +66 — — 11.1% -2.78 0–1 0–1 — 0.00
43 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 1593 114.1 -1.10 -0.46 0.880 47.2% +55 — +447 40.0% -1.00 1–4 (20%) 3–1 (75%) 95.5 -0.01
Career — 1863 136.6 +0.89 -0.87 0.980 49.6% -1 -62 -137 48.0% -0.17 82–79 (51%) 70–49 (59%) 109.8 -0.08 — 2369 167.3 +3.54 +2.76 1.146 52.9% +33 -76 +111 68.9% +1.40 185–126 (59%) 137–101 (58%) 99.2 -2.45

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.