H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Magdalena Maleeva vs Emilie Loit H2H: 1-1

Magdalena Maleeva and Emilie Loit are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Emilie Loit leads 1–0 on carpet, while Magdalena Maleeva leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Magdalena Maleeva won the 2002 US Open round of 64 4-6 6-3 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Magdalena Maleeva
BUL Age 51 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main-draw meetings
Emilie Loit
FRA Age 47 Left-Handed 167 cm / 5'6"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Magdalena Maleeva #17 4-6 6-3 7-5 Emilie Loit #54 Match data Aug 29, 2002* R64 US Open Grand Slam Hard
Emilie Loit #234 6-0 6-2 Magdalena Maleeva #29 Match data Feb 12, 1998* R32 Paris Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Magdalena Maleeva #401 #4 1,834 2,069 389 275 58.6% 0 2 0 2 6 10
Emilie Loit #161 #27 1,016 1,779 162 180 47.4% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Magdalena Maleeva Emilie Loit
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1989 1–3 25.0% #216 1,498 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1990 12–10 54.5% #72 1,654 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1991 17–15 53.1% #38 1,717 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1992 30–15 66.7% #20 1,926 0 1 — — — — — — —
18 1993 36–16 69.2% #16 1,966 0 1 1997 0–1 0.0% #243 1,498 0 0
19 1994 31–12 72.1% #11 1,989 0 3 1998 3–5 37.5% #96 1,512 0 0
20 1995 37–12 75.5% #6 2,047 0 6 1999 3–15 16.7% #101 1,424 0 0
21 1996 20–16 55.6% #19 1,924 0 6 2000 4–6 40.0% #101 1,457 0 0
22 1997 21–22 48.8% #36 1,759 0 6 2001 12–15 44.4% #95 1,547 0 0
23 1998 5–7 41.7% #116 1,721 0 6 2002 19–17 52.8% #58 1,625 0 0
24 1999 12–8 60.0% #76 1,741 0 7 2003 23–24 48.9% #41 1,673 0 0
25 2000 25–25 50.0% #23 1,813 0 7 2004 29–20 59.2% #45 1,668 0 2
26 2001 35–24 59.3% #16 1,850 0 8 2005 15–20 42.9% #82 1,548 0 2
27 2002 35–24 59.3% #14 1,856 0 9 2006 20–16 55.6% #56 1,622 0 2
28 2003 27–21 56.2% #30 1,746 0 10 2007 26–22 54.2% #43 1,618 0 3
29 2004 28–25 52.8% #25 1,695 0 10 2008 5–15 25.0% #137 1,518 0 3
30 2005 17–20 45.9% #53 1,679 0 10 2009 3–4 42.9% #161 1,533 0 3

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Magdalena Maleeva Emilie Loit
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 1989 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1990 4 4 8 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1991 8 7 15 53.3% 6 5 11 54.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1992 8 3 11 72.7% 14 6 20 70.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 8 5 13 61.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1993 16 6 22 72.7% 10 4 14 71.4% 2 1 3 66.7% 8 5 13 61.5% 1997 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
19 1994 10 4 14 71.4% 7 6 13 53.8% 1 1 2 50.0% 13 1 14 92.9% 1998 1 1 2 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
20 1995 2 3 5 40.0% 14 5 19 73.7% — — — — 21 4 25 84.0% 1999 3 6 9 33.3% 0 5 5 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
21 1996 4 4 8 50.0% 11 6 17 64.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 4 8 50.0% 2000 2 3 5 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — —
22 1997 9 10 19 47.4% 1 3 4 25.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 6 6 12 50.0% 2001 4 6 10 40.0% 7 6 13 53.8% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
23 1998 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — 3 4 7 42.9% 2002 6 7 13 46.2% 12 8 20 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 1999 5 0 5 100.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 3 1 4 75.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2003 10 11 21 47.6% 10 8 18 55.6% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
25 2000 10 10 20 50.0% 6 8 14 42.9% 1 2 3 33.3% 8 5 13 61.5% 2004 6 11 17 35.3% 19 5 24 79.2% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 2001 9 12 21 42.9% 8 5 13 61.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 15 5 20 75.0% 2005 4 9 13 30.8% 11 9 20 55.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
27 2002 11 11 22 50.0% 7 5 12 58.3% 7 3 10 70.0% 10 5 15 66.7% 2006 5 8 13 38.5% 13 6 19 68.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
28 2003 14 12 26 53.8% 4 4 8 50.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2007 9 11 20 45.0% 15 9 24 62.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
29 2004 12 15 27 44.4% 6 5 11 54.5% 6 3 9 66.7% 4 2 6 66.7% 2008 1 7 8 12.5% 3 6 9 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
30 2005 9 11 20 45.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2009 — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7%
Career — 133 117 250 53.2% 105 74 179 58.7% 41 25 66 62.1% 110 59 169 65.1% — 51 80 131 38.9% 94 72 166 56.6% 10 14 24 41.7% 7 14 21 33.3%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 28/138 of Magdalena Maleeva's and 84/242 of Emilie Loit's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Magdalena Maleeva Emilie Loit
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
24 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2003 8/47 1.3 2.4 62.2% 65.0% 52.9% 56.7% 36.8% 60.6% 43.0%
25 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2004 4/49 1.5 3.0 58.5% 60.4% 45.6% 43.3% 45.3% 54.9% 39.2%
26 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2005 5/35 1.4 3.0 52.1% 67.1% 43.2% 51.3% 48.2% 56.1% 48.6%
27 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 15/36 2.3 2.4 63.3% 58.3% 46.8% 55.7% 48.5% 54.0% 45.5%
28 2003 7/48 2.1 2.6 64.6% 65.7% 49.3% 52.1% 35.7% 60.1% 48.6% 2007 31/48 1.8 3.0 64.1% 60.0% 45.7% 50.1% 49.0% 54.5% 45.5%
29 2004 10/53 2.0 3.1 65.6% 62.8% 41.0% 62.8% 38.6% 55.5% 48.1% 2008 15/20 2.0 2.9 66.4% 55.8% 37.9% 40.8% 41.0% 49.6% 39.2%
30 2005 11/37 1.9 2.1 65.1% 64.7% 46.3% 46.7% 61.5% 58.4% 48.3% 2009 6/7 2.7 3.5 62.6% 63.4% 43.1% 51.0% 60.7% 55.4% 40.8%
Career — 28/664 2.0 2.6 65.2% 64.3% 45.2% 53.8% 46.9% 57.8% 48.3% — 84/342 1.9 2.9 63.1% 60.1% 44.8% 49.9% 46.9% 54.3% 43.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Magdalena Maleeva Emilie Loit
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 1989 1498 109.9 — — — — — — — 30.0% -1.50 1–1 — — -0.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1990 1655 130.9 — — — — -41 -10 — 52.2% +0.11 4–2 (67%) 0–2 — -0.02 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1991 1718 138.5 — — — — -25 -8 — 52.7% +0.09 5–7 (42%) 4–2 (67%) 101.2 -0.21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1992 1926 159.6 — — — — -35 -68 — 66.0% +1.12 5–4 (56%) 4–1 (80%) 102.9 -1.14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1993 1967 161.1 — — — — -31 -6 -321 67.9% +1.40 5–4 (56%) 7–4 (64%) 101.2 +1.36 1997 1499 112.1 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–1 — — -0.22
19 1994 1989 153.6 — — — — +43 -121 — 72.0% +1.70 7–6 (54%) 3–6 (33%) 96.9 +1.01 1998 1512 121.9 — — — — +45 +20 — 44.4% -0.11 0–2 0–1 — +0.24
20 1995 2047 157.5 — — — — +24 -68 — 67.6% +1.06 14–3 (82%) 5–3 (63%) 107.8 -0.64 1999 1424 101.4 — — — — +104 +28 — 26.2% -1.86 1–5 (17%) 0–3 (0%) — +0.55
21 1996 1924 151.7 — — — — +52 +67 -275 57.0% +0.65 4–7 (36%) 2–4 (33%) 92.7 -1.38 2000 1458 109.0 — — — — +67 +11 — 45.8% -0.12 1–3 (25%) 0–2 — +0.50
22 1997 1759 148.3 — — — — +60 +169 -47 50.5% +0.23 6–7 (46%) 1–6 (14%) 91.0 +1.32 2001 1547 113.0 — — — — -32 -21 — 44.3% -0.61 4–5 (44%) 2–2 (50%) 99.5 +0.79
23 1998 1722 124.2 — — — — +36 — — 39.3% -0.82 3–1 (75%) 1–1 — +0.80 2002 1626 113.6 — — — — -91 +30 — 52.4% -0.04 10–6 (63%) 4–3 (57%) 106.6 +0.19
24 1999 1741 133.4 — — — — +31 +100 +8 60.0% +1.06 4–6 (40%) 4–1 (80%) 96.9 +0.19 2003 1673 132.7 +2.59 +0.21 1.090 51.0% -71 +43 -104 49.1% -0.05 10–8 (56%) 5–5 (50%) 104.6 -1.57
25 2000 1813 151.1 — — — — +22 -37 -64 51.3% +0.37 5–10 (33%) 6–9 (40%) 92.4 -2.93 2004 1668 124.9 -0.94 -1.99 0.870 46.7% -119 +171 -41 59.8% +0.45 9–6 (60%) 6–7 (46%) 102.5 +1.06
26 2001 1851 153.2 — — — — +18 -62 -53 56.2% +0.37 12–9 (57%) 6–5 (55%) 103.3 -2.14 2005 1549 112.1 -0.35 +0.26 1.107 52.4% -55 +179 — 48.8% -0.19 3–9 (25%) 4–3 (57%) 93.9 +1.69
27 2002 1856 143.5 — — — — +7 -111 +10 57.2% +0.37 11–9 (55%) 7–5 (58%) 99.4 -1.27 2006 1622 125.1 -1.55 +0.33 0.990 50.1% -86 +130 — 55.7% +0.60 5–4 (56%) 5–8 (38%) 100.0 +1.39
28 2003 1747 136.2 +1.69 +2.10 1.218 54.1% -21 -7 +210 55.1% +0.64 11–11 (50%) 3–6 (33%) 93.7 +2.58 2007 1619 129.8 -0.93 +0.96 1.001 50.0% -37 +141 — 55.4% +0.37 7–4 (64%) 4–4 (50%) 104.3 -0.20
29 2004 1695 138.3 +0.28 +2.23 1.082 51.8% -48 +82 +265 52.0% +0.26 10–11 (48%) 3–6 (33%) 94.6 -0.09 2008 1518 106.1 -4.05 -3.45 0.777 44.3% 0 +121 — 30.2% -1.60 2–3 (40%) 3–5 (38%) 97.4 -0.27
30 2005 1680 135.0 +1.49 +2.33 1.159 53.0% -29 +43 +230 49.4% +0.12 2–7 (22%) 4–4 (50%) 94.8 -0.82 2009 1533 118.8 +0.06 -0.68 0.916 48.8% +33 +65 — 44.4% -0.39 2–2 (50%) 1–0 — +0.07
Career — 2069 155.0 +1.11 +2.24 1.144 52.8% +3 -19 +52 57.4% +0.59 109–105 (51%) 60–65 (48%) 93.1 -0.54 — 1780 125.3 -1.16 -0.31 0.956 49.0% -44 +99 -67 49.4% -0.12 54–58 (48%) 34–43 (44%) 98.9 +1.24

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.