H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Magdalena Maleeva vs Hana Mandlikova H2H: 0-1
Hana Mandlikova holds a 1–0 lead over Magdalena Maleeva in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Hana Mandlikova leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Hana Mandlikova won the 1989 Mahwah third round 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BUL
Age 51
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 64
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 24, 1989* | Mahwah | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Hana Mandlikova | 6-4 6-2 | Magdalena Maleeva | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Magdalena Maleeva | #401 | #4 | 1,834 | 2,083 | 384 | 272 | 58.5% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 6 | 10 |
| Hana Mandlikova | #31 | #3 | 157 | 2,299 | 516 | 191 | 73.0% | 4 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 18 | 25 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Magdalena Maleeva | Hana Mandlikova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | 1989 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #216 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 1990 | 12–10 | 54.5% | #72 | 1,654 | 0 | 0 | 1977 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 1991 | 17–15 | 53.1% | #38 | 1,718 | 0 | 0 | 1978 | 22–8 | 73.3% | — | 1,750 | 0 | 1 |
| 17 | 1992 | 28–14 | 66.7% | #20 | 1,908 | 0 | 1 | 1979 | 36–14 | 72.0% | — | 1,985 | 0 | 5 |
| 18 | 1993 | 36–16 | 69.2% | #16 | 1,962 | 0 | 1 | 1980 | 76–17 | 81.7% | — | 2,230 | 1 | 11 |
| 19 | 1994 | 31–12 | 72.1% | #11 | 1,980 | 0 | 3 | 1981 | 56–24 | 70.0% | — | 2,108 | 2 | 14 |
| 20 | 1995 | 37–12 | 75.5% | #6 | 2,029 | 0 | 6 | 1982 | 35–19 | 64.8% | — | 1,998 | 2 | 14 |
| 21 | 1996 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #19 | 1,908 | 0 | 6 | 1983 | 44–21 | 67.7% | — | 1,977 | 2 | 14 |
| 22 | 1997 | 21–22 | 48.8% | #36 | 1,746 | 0 | 6 | 1984 | 47–11 | 81.0% | #3 | 2,081 | 2 | 19 |
| 23 | 1998 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #116 | 1,713 | 0 | 6 | 1985 | 53–13 | 80.3% | #3 | 2,210 | 3 | 22 |
| 24 | 1999 | 12–8 | 60.0% | #76 | 1,737 | 0 | 7 | 1986 | 44–15 | 74.6% | #4 | 2,233 | 3 | 22 |
| 25 | 2000 | 25–25 | 50.0% | #23 | 1,813 | 0 | 7 | 1987 | 47–13 | 78.3% | #5 | 2,136 | 4 | 25 |
| 26 | 2001 | 35–24 | 59.3% | #16 | 1,849 | 0 | 8 | 1988 | 15–7 | 68.2% | #29 | 2,031 | 4 | 25 |
| 27 | 2002 | 35–24 | 59.3% | #14 | 1,855 | 0 | 9 | 1989 | 33–19 | 63.5% | #14 | 1,941 | 4 | 25 |
| 28 | 2003 | 27–21 | 56.2% | #30 | 1,746 | 0 | 10 | 1990 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #31 | 1,809 | 4 | 25 |
| 29 | 2004 | 27–24 | 52.9% | #25 | 1,710 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2005 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #53 | 1,682 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |