H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Magdalena Maleeva vs Jana Nejedly H2H: 2-0
Magdalena Maleeva holds a 2–0 lead over Jana Nejedly in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Magdalena Maleeva leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Magdalena Maleeva won the 1997 Stanford third round 6-0 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BUL
Age 51
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
CAN
Age 52
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 24, 1997* | Stanford | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Magdalena Maleeva | 6-0 6-3 | Jana Nejedly | Match data |
| Aug 30, 1995* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Magdalena Maleeva | 6-4 6-2 | Jana Nejedly | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Magdalena Maleeva | #401 | #4 | 1,834 | 2,083 | 384 | 272 | 58.5% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 6 | 10 |
| Jana Nejedly | #914 | #64 | 488 | 1,626 | 49 | 104 | 32.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Magdalena Maleeva | Jana Nejedly | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | 1989 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #216 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 1990 | 12–10 | 54.5% | #72 | 1,654 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1991 | 17–15 | 53.1% | #38 | 1,718 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1992 | 28–14 | 66.7% | #20 | 1,908 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1993 | 36–16 | 69.2% | #16 | 1,962 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1994 | 31–12 | 72.1% | #11 | 1,980 | 0 | 3 | 1993 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #328 | 1,463 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1995 | 37–12 | 75.5% | #6 | 2,029 | 0 | 6 | 1994 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #139 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1996 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #19 | 1,908 | 0 | 6 | 1995 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #82 | 1,580 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1997 | 21–22 | 48.8% | #36 | 1,746 | 0 | 6 | 1996 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #130 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1998 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #116 | 1,713 | 0 | 6 | 1997 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #137 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1999 | 12–8 | 60.0% | #76 | 1,737 | 0 | 7 | 1998 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #75 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2000 | 25–25 | 50.0% | #23 | 1,813 | 0 | 7 | 1999 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #88 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2001 | 35–24 | 59.3% | #16 | 1,849 | 0 | 8 | 2000 | 12–20 | 37.5% | #69 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2002 | 35–24 | 59.3% | #14 | 1,855 | 0 | 9 | 2001 | 8–17 | 32.0% | #96 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2003 | 27–21 | 56.2% | #30 | 1,746 | 0 | 10 | 2002 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #233 | 1,424 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2004 | 27–24 | 52.9% | #25 | 1,710 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2005 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #53 | 1,682 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |