H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Magdalena Maleeva vs Pam Shriver H2H: 2-2

Magdalena Maleeva and Pam Shriver are tied 2–2 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Magdalena Maleeva leads 2–1 on carpet, while Pam Shriver leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Magdalena Maleeva won the 1994 Zurich round of 32 7-5 7-6.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Magdalena Maleeva
BUL Age 51 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
2 – 2
4 main-draw meetings
Pam Shriver
USA Age 64 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Magdalena Maleeva #13 7-5 7-6 Pam Shriver #51 Match data Oct 6, 1994* R32 Zurich Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Carpet
Magdalena Maleeva #15 6-0 6-3 Pam Shriver #33 Match data Oct 8, 1993* R16 Zurich Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Carpet
Pam Shriver #31 6-4 6-3 Magdalena Maleeva #18 Match data Feb 6, 1993* R16 Tokyo Pan Pacific Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Carpet
Pam Shriver #30 6-7(10) 6-1 6-2 Magdalena Maleeva #51 Match data Aug 29, 1991* R64 US Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Magdalena Maleeva #401 #4 1,834 2,069 389 275 58.6% 0 2 0 2 6 10
Pam Shriver #234 #3 163 2,304 626 278 69.2% 0 0 0 5 19 24

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Magdalena Maleeva Pam Shriver
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1989 1–3 25.0% #216 1,498 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1990 12–10 54.5% #72 1,654 0 0 1978 23–8 74.2% — 1,838 0 1
16 1991 17–15 53.1% #38 1,717 0 0 1979 16–16 50.0% — 1,813 0 1
17 1992 30–15 66.7% #20 1,926 0 1 1980 47–21 69.1% #9 2,054 0 2
18 1993 36–16 69.2% #16 1,966 0 1 1981 58–25 69.9% #7 2,137 0 4
19 1994 31–12 72.1% #11 1,989 0 3 1982 47–19 71.2% #6 2,098 0 5
20 1995 37–12 75.5% #6 2,047 0 6 1983 52–15 77.6% #4 2,162 0 8
21 1996 20–16 55.6% #19 1,924 0 6 1984 44–13 77.2% #4 2,060 0 10
22 1997 21–22 48.8% #36 1,759 0 6 1985 54–13 80.6% #4 2,118 0 14
23 1998 5–7 41.7% #116 1,721 0 6 1986 47–15 75.8% #6 2,196 0 16
24 1999 12–8 60.0% #76 1,741 0 7 1987 60–13 82.2% #4 2,255 0 20
25 2000 25–25 50.0% #23 1,813 0 7 1988 60–15 80.0% #5 2,197 0 24
26 2001 35–24 59.3% #16 1,850 0 8 1989 24–14 63.2% #18 1,960 0 24
27 2002 35–24 59.3% #14 1,856 0 9 1990 8–5 61.5% #66 1,915 0 24
28 2003 27–21 56.2% #30 1,746 0 10 1991 21–18 53.8% #37 1,823 0 24
29 2004 28–25 52.8% #25 1,695 0 10 1992 25–18 58.1% #30 1,857 0 24
30 2005 17–20 45.9% #53 1,679 0 10 1993 14–13 51.9% #38 1,819 0 24
31 — — — — — — — 1994 13–16 44.8% #63 1,699 0 24
32 — — — — — — — 1995 7–11 38.9% #110 1,649 0 24
33 — — — — — — — 1996 4–9 30.8% #189 1,611 0 24
34 — — — — — — — 1997 2–1 66.7% #234 1,635 0 24

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Magdalena Maleeva Pam Shriver
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 1989 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1990 4 4 8 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1978 6 1 7 85.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 10 2 12 83.3%
16 1991 8 7 15 53.3% 6 5 11 54.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 1979 2 4 6 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 11 6 17 64.7% 2 5 7 28.6%
17 1992 8 3 11 72.7% 14 6 20 70.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 8 5 13 61.5% 1980 22 7 29 75.9% 3 2 5 60.0% 13 5 18 72.2% 9 7 16 56.3%
18 1993 16 6 22 72.7% 10 4 14 71.4% 2 1 3 66.7% 8 5 13 61.5% 1981 15 5 20 75.0% 6 2 8 75.0% 19 3 22 86.4% 18 15 33 54.5%
19 1994 10 4 14 71.4% 7 6 13 53.8% 1 1 2 50.0% 13 1 14 92.9% 1982 11 4 15 73.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 15 4 19 78.9% 18 9 27 66.7%
20 1995 2 3 5 40.0% 14 5 19 73.7% — — — — 21 4 25 84.0% 1983 17 3 20 85.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 13 3 16 81.3% 20 8 28 71.4%
21 1996 4 4 8 50.0% 11 6 17 64.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 4 8 50.0% 1984 10 3 13 76.9% — — — — 15 4 19 78.9% 19 6 25 76.0%
22 1997 9 10 19 47.4% 1 3 4 25.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 6 6 12 50.0% 1985 14 3 17 82.4% 2 2 4 50.0% 19 4 23 82.6% 19 4 23 82.6%
23 1998 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — 3 4 7 42.9% 1986 14 5 19 73.7% — — — — 10 1 11 90.9% 23 9 32 71.9%
24 1999 5 0 5 100.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 3 1 4 75.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1987 13 3 16 81.3% — — — — 30 5 35 85.7% 17 5 22 77.3%
25 2000 10 10 20 50.0% 6 8 14 42.9% 1 2 3 33.3% 8 5 13 61.5% 1988 20 8 28 71.4% — — — — 24 4 28 85.7% 16 3 19 84.2%
26 2001 9 12 21 42.9% 8 5 13 61.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 15 5 20 75.0% 1989 12 7 19 63.2% — — — — 7 3 10 70.0% 5 4 9 55.6%
27 2002 11 11 22 50.0% 7 5 12 58.3% 7 3 10 70.0% 10 5 15 66.7% 1990 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — 5 2 7 71.4%
28 2003 14 12 26 53.8% 4 4 8 50.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1991 11 11 22 50.0% — — — — 7 3 10 70.0% 3 4 7 42.9%
29 2004 12 15 27 44.4% 6 5 11 54.5% 6 3 9 66.7% 4 2 6 66.7% 1992 11 9 20 55.0% — — — — 6 3 9 66.7% 8 6 14 57.1%
30 2005 9 11 20 45.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1993 4 6 10 40.0% — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% 7 5 12 58.3%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 7 7 14 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 5 7 28.6%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% 2 4 6 33.3%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1 6 7 14.3% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 133 117 250 53.2% 105 74 179 58.7% 41 25 66 62.1% 110 59 169 65.1% — 196 100 296 66.2% 18 12 30 60.0% 205 61 266 77.1% 204 104 308 66.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Magdalena Maleeva Pam Shriver
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 1989 1498 109.9 — — — — — — — 30.0% -1.50 1–1 — — -0.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1990 1655 130.9 — — — — -41 -10 — 52.2% +0.11 4–2 (67%) 0–2 — -0.02 1978 1839 153.8 — — — — +104 — -258 69.2% +1.66 4–3 (57%) 7–3 (70%) 108.7 +0.06
16 1991 1718 138.5 — — — — -25 -8 — 52.7% +0.09 5–7 (42%) 4–2 (67%) 101.2 -0.21 1979 1813 147.5 — — — — +7 — -37 57.1% +0.36 0–8 (0%) 4–2 (67%) 93.1 -0.83
17 1992 1926 159.6 — — — — -35 -68 — 66.0% +1.12 5–4 (56%) 4–1 (80%) 102.9 -1.14 1980 2055 163.4 — — — — -49 -406 -67 68.7% +1.41 11–9 (55%) 8–7 (53%) 104.9 -7.03
18 1993 1967 161.1 — — — — -31 -6 -321 67.9% +1.40 5–4 (56%) 7–4 (64%) 101.2 +1.36 1981 2138 166.4 — — — — -89 -332 -9 71.3% +1.67 4–10 (29%) 10–6 (63%) 96.8 -6.74
19 1994 1989 153.6 — — — — +43 -121 — 72.0% +1.70 7–6 (54%) 3–6 (33%) 96.9 +1.01 1982 2099 161.9 — — — — -1 -284 +23 69.7% +1.63 7–7 (50%) 7–5 (58%) 102.0 -2.82
20 1995 2047 157.5 — — — — +24 -68 — 67.6% +1.06 14–3 (82%) 5–3 (63%) 107.8 -0.64 1983 2163 167.8 — — — — +33 -321 +16 73.1% +1.83 11–6 (65%) 7–5 (58%) 101.0 -4.79
21 1996 1924 151.7 — — — — +52 +67 -275 57.0% +0.65 4–7 (36%) 2–4 (33%) 92.7 -1.38 1984 2061 163.5 — — — — +77 — +84 75.8% +1.98 4–8 (33%) 7–2 (78%) 94.6 -0.74
22 1997 1759 148.3 — — — — +60 +169 -47 50.5% +0.23 6–7 (46%) 1–6 (14%) 91.0 +1.32 1985 2119 161.1 — — — — +48 -302 +85 75.7% +1.82 10–4 (71%) 13–7 (65%) 101.9 +0.23
23 1998 1722 124.2 — — — — +36 — — 39.3% -0.82 3–1 (75%) 1–1 — +0.80 1986 2196 175.2 — — — — +23 — +26 75.9% +2.04 2–7 (22%) 7–4 (64%) 95.5 -4.63
24 1999 1741 133.4 — — — — +31 +100 +8 60.0% +1.06 4–6 (40%) 4–1 (80%) 96.9 +0.19 1987 2256 167.4 — — — — -1 — +39 78.5% +2.08 8–4 (67%) 6–3 (67%) 102.7 -3.44
25 2000 1813 151.1 — — — — +22 -37 -64 51.3% +0.37 5–10 (33%) 6–9 (40%) 92.4 -2.93 1988 2197 167.5 — — — — +37 — +105 76.5% +1.85 11–5 (69%) 8–6 (57%) 98.7 -3.71
26 2001 1851 153.2 — — — — +18 -62 -53 56.2% +0.37 12–9 (57%) 6–5 (55%) 103.3 -2.14 1989 1961 141.0 — — — — +38 — +226 60.0% +0.72 8–6 (57%) 2–2 (50%) 92.2 +0.34
27 2002 1856 143.5 — — — — +7 -111 +10 57.2% +0.37 11–9 (55%) 7–5 (58%) 99.4 -1.27 1990 1915 136.1 — — — — +25 — — 58.6% +0.83 2–1 (67%) 1–1 — +0.41
28 2003 1747 136.2 +1.69 +2.10 1.218 54.1% -21 -7 +210 55.1% +0.64 11–11 (50%) 3–6 (33%) 93.7 +2.58 1991 1823 146.6 — — — — -5 — +351 56.0% +0.62 1–5 (17%) 2–8 (20%) 88.5 -2.30
29 2004 1695 138.3 +0.28 +2.23 1.082 51.8% -48 +82 +265 52.0% +0.26 10–11 (48%) 3–6 (33%) 94.6 -0.09 1992 1857 156.5 — — — — +5 — +328 56.4% +0.71 5–3 (63%) 4–5 (44%) 101.5 -2.50
30 2005 1680 135.0 +1.49 +2.33 1.159 53.0% -29 +43 +230 49.4% +0.12 2–7 (22%) 4–4 (50%) 94.8 -0.82 1993 1820 148.3 — — — — +6 — +300 52.5% +0.05 4–7 (36%) 3–2 (60%) 95.2 -1.73
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1700 125.8 — — — — +6 — +296 48.5% -0.04 5–7 (42%) 3–3 (50%) 95.7 +0.51
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1649 116.2 — — — — -2 — +277 38.1% -0.64 4–2 (67%) 2–2 (50%) 101.7 +0.26
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1611 115.9 — — — — -22 — +337 39.3% -0.79 1–3 (25%) 1–1 — -0.33
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 1636 111.8 — — — — -20 — — 57.1% +0.86 1–0 0–2 — -0.20
Career — 2069 155.0 +1.11 +2.24 1.144 52.8% +3 -19 +52 57.4% +0.59 109–105 (51%) 60–65 (48%) 93.1 -0.54 — 2304 166.5 — — — — +10 -331 +78 67.8% +1.37 103–105 (50%) 102–76 (57%) 97.2 -4.47

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.