H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Magdalena Maleeva vs Pam Shriver H2H: 2-2

Magdalena Maleeva and Pam Shriver are tied 2–2 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Magdalena Maleeva leads 2–1 on carpet, while Pam Shriver leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Magdalena Maleeva won the 1994 Zurich third round 7-5 7-6.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Magdalena Maleeva
BUL Age 51 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
2 – 2
4 main draw meetings
Pam Shriver
USA Age 64 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 6, 1994* Zurich WTA 1000 R32 Carpet Magdalena Maleeva #13 7-5 7-6 Pam Shriver #51 Match data
Oct 8, 1993* Zurich WTA 1000 R16 Carpet Magdalena Maleeva #15 6-0 6-3 Pam Shriver #33 Match data
Feb 6, 1993* Tokyo Pan Pacific WTA 1000 R16 Carpet Pam Shriver #31 6-4 6-3 Magdalena Maleeva #18 Match data
Aug 29, 1991* US Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Pam Shriver #30 6-7(10) 6-1 6-2 Magdalena Maleeva #51 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Magdalena Maleeva #401 #4 1,834 2,083 384 272 58.5% 0 2 0 2 6 10
Pam Shriver #234 #3 163 2,302 624 277 69.3% 0 0 0 4 20 24

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Magdalena Maleeva Pam Shriver
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1989 1–3 25.0% #216 1,497 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1990 12–10 54.5% #72 1,654 0 0 1978 23–8 74.2% — 1,849 0 1
16 1991 17–15 53.1% #38 1,718 0 0 1979 16–16 50.0% — 1,798 0 1
17 1992 28–14 66.7% #20 1,908 0 1 1980 47–21 69.1% — 2,027 0 2
18 1993 36–16 69.2% #16 1,962 0 1 1981 58–25 69.9% — 2,122 0 4
19 1994 31–12 72.1% #11 1,980 0 3 1982 47–19 71.2% — 2,087 0 5
20 1995 37–12 75.5% #6 2,029 0 6 1983 52–15 77.6% — 2,161 0 8
21 1996 18–15 54.5% #19 1,908 0 6 1984 44–13 77.2% #4 2,060 0 10
22 1997 21–22 48.8% #36 1,746 0 6 1985 54–13 80.6% #4 2,117 0 14
23 1998 5–7 41.7% #116 1,713 0 6 1986 47–15 75.8% #5 2,194 0 16
24 1999 12–8 60.0% #76 1,737 0 7 1987 60–13 82.2% #4 2,254 0 20
25 2000 25–25 50.0% #23 1,813 0 7 1988 58–14 80.6% #5 2,188 0 24
26 2001 35–24 59.3% #16 1,849 0 8 1989 24–14 63.2% #18 1,955 0 24
27 2002 35–24 59.3% #14 1,855 0 9 1990 8–5 61.5% #66 1,911 0 24
28 2003 27–21 56.2% #30 1,746 0 10 1991 21–18 53.8% #37 1,822 0 24
29 2004 27–24 52.9% #25 1,710 0 10 1992 25–18 58.1% #30 1,858 0 24
30 2005 17–20 45.9% #53 1,682 0 10 1993 14–13 51.9% #38 1,819 0 24
31 — — — — — — — 1994 13–16 44.8% #63 1,699 0 24
32 — — — — — — — 1995 7–11 38.9% #110 1,649 0 24
33 — — — — — — — 1996 4–9 30.8% #189 1,611 0 24
34 — — — — — — — 1997 2–1 66.7% #234 1,635 0 24