H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Magdalena Rybarikova vs Anabel Medina Garrigues H2H: 1-1
Magdalena Rybarikova and Anabel Medina Garrigues are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Magdalena Rybarikova won the 2010 Auckland third round 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SVK
Age 37
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 43
Right-Handed
169 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 7, 2010* | Auckland | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Magdalena Rybarikova | 6-2 6-3 | Anabel Medina Garrigues | Match data |
| Sep 26, 2009* | Seoul | WTA 250 | QF | Hard | Anabel Medina Garrigues | 6-3 6-3 | Magdalena Rybarikova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Magdalena Rybarikova | #199 | #17 | 2,405 | 1,817 | 188 | 207 | 47.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Anabel Medina Garrigues | #741 | #16 | 2,505 | 1,852 | 310 | 275 | 53.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 8 | 11 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Magdalena Rybarikova | Anabel Medina Garrigues | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2006 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #342 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #109 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2007 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #231 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 16–20 | 44.4% | #66 | 1,563 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 2008 | 9–9 | 50.0% | #59 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 9–3 | 75.0% | #116 | 1,687 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 2009 | 27–26 | 50.9% | #44 | 1,694 | 0 | 1 | 2003 | 13–12 | 52.0% | #71 | 1,613 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2010 | 12–21 | 36.4% | #106 | 1,582 | 0 | 1 | 2004 | 25–22 | 53.2% | #39 | 1,716 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 2011 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #71 | 1,607 | 0 | 2 | 2005 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #33 | 1,747 | 0 | 4 |
| 23 | 2012 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #62 | 1,605 | 0 | 3 | 2006 | 34–24 | 58.6% | #27 | 1,690 | 0 | 6 |
| 24 | 2013 | 29–22 | 56.9% | #37 | 1,739 | 0 | 4 | 2007 | 25–22 | 53.2% | #34 | 1,694 | 0 | 7 |
| 25 | 2014 | 20–26 | 43.5% | #50 | 1,691 | 0 | 4 | 2008 | 41–24 | 63.1% | #22 | 1,833 | 0 | 8 |
| 26 | 2015 | 16–22 | 42.1% | #80 | 1,610 | 0 | 4 | 2009 | 33–26 | 55.9% | #27 | 1,683 | 0 | 9 |
| 27 | 2016 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #154 | 1,665 | 0 | 4 | 2010 | 18–25 | 41.9% | #71 | 1,565 | 0 | 9 |
| 28 | 2017 | 19–11 | 63.3% | #20 | 1,794 | 0 | 4 | 2011 | 35–21 | 62.5% | #27 | 1,774 | 0 | 11 |
| 29 | 2018 | 16–21 | 43.2% | #48 | 1,677 | 0 | 4 | 2012 | 23–25 | 47.9% | #50 | 1,629 | 0 | 11 |
| 30 | 2019 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #176 | 1,608 | 0 | 4 | 2013 | 8–19 | 29.6% | #100 | 1,553 | 0 | 11 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #452 | 1,501 | 0 | 11 |