H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Magdalena Rybarikova vs Jarmila Wolfe H2H: 1-2
Jarmila Wolfe holds a 2–1 lead over Magdalena Rybarikova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Jarmila Wolfe leads 2–0 on clay, while Magdalena Rybarikova leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jarmila Wolfe won the 2012 Roland Garros first round 6-3 4-1 RET.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SVK
Age 37
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 39
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 29, 2012* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Jarmila Wolfe | 6-3 4-1 (ret.) | Magdalena Rybarikova | Match data |
| Sep 24, 2011* | Guangzhou | WTA 250 | QF | Hard | Magdalena Rybarikova | 6-4 6-3 | Jarmila Wolfe | Match data |
| May 6, 2010* | Estoril | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Jarmila Wolfe | 6-4 6-3 | Magdalena Rybarikova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Magdalena Rybarikova | #199 | #17 | 2,405 | 1,817 | 188 | 207 | 47.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Jarmila Wolfe | #623 | #25 | 2,060 | 1,799 | 104 | 137 | 43.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Magdalena Rybarikova | Jarmila Wolfe | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #195 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 2006 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #342 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #222 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2007 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #231 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #147 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2008 | 9–9 | 50.0% | #59 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #69 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2009 | 27–26 | 50.9% | #44 | 1,694 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #142 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2010 | 12–21 | 36.4% | #106 | 1,582 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #99 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2011 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #71 | 1,607 | 0 | 2 | 2009 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #110 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2012 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #62 | 1,605 | 0 | 3 | 2010 | 19–12 | 61.3% | #42 | 1,687 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2013 | 29–22 | 56.9% | #37 | 1,739 | 0 | 4 | 2011 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #33 | 1,696 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2014 | 20–26 | 43.5% | #50 | 1,691 | 0 | 4 | 2012 | 7–19 | 26.9% | #183 | 1,509 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2015 | 16–22 | 42.1% | #80 | 1,610 | 0 | 4 | 2013 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #238 | 1,535 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2016 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #154 | 1,665 | 0 | 4 | 2014 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #71 | 1,555 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2017 | 19–11 | 63.3% | #20 | 1,794 | 0 | 4 | 2015 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #105 | 1,537 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2018 | 16–21 | 43.2% | #48 | 1,677 | 0 | 4 | 2016 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #624 | 1,480 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 2019 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #176 | 1,608 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |