H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Magdalena Rybarikova vs Meghann Shaughnessy H2H: 1-1
Magdalena Rybarikova and Meghann Shaughnessy are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Magdalena Rybarikova leads 1–0 on clay, while Meghann Shaughnessy leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Magdalena Rybarikova won the 2008 Prague third round 6-1 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SVK
Age 37
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 47
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 1, 2008* | Prague | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Magdalena Rybarikova | 6-1 6-3 | Meghann Shaughnessy | Match data |
| Sep 20, 2007* | Portoroz | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Meghann Shaughnessy | 6-1 6-4 | Magdalena Rybarikova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Magdalena Rybarikova | #199 | #17 | 2,405 | 1,817 | 188 | 207 | 47.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Meghann Shaughnessy | #1,104 | #11 | 1,949 | 1,888 | 233 | 233 | 50.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Magdalena Rybarikova | Meghann Shaughnessy | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2006 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #342 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #165 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2007 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #231 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #198 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2008 | 9–9 | 50.0% | #59 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #69 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2009 | 27–26 | 50.9% | #44 | 1,694 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 10–22 | 31.2% | #99 | 1,439 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2010 | 12–21 | 36.4% | #106 | 1,582 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #38 | 1,652 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2011 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #71 | 1,607 | 0 | 2 | 2001 | 45–25 | 64.3% | #12 | 1,825 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2012 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #62 | 1,605 | 0 | 3 | 2002 | 29–27 | 51.8% | #30 | 1,716 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2013 | 29–22 | 56.9% | #37 | 1,739 | 0 | 4 | 2003 | 32–23 | 58.2% | #17 | 1,725 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2014 | 20–26 | 43.5% | #50 | 1,691 | 0 | 4 | 2004 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #40 | 1,663 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2015 | 16–22 | 42.1% | #80 | 1,610 | 0 | 4 | 2005 | 17–25 | 40.5% | #66 | 1,563 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2016 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #154 | 1,665 | 0 | 4 | 2006 | 27–20 | 57.4% | #37 | 1,709 | 0 | 5 |
| 28 | 2017 | 19–11 | 63.3% | #20 | 1,794 | 0 | 4 | 2007 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #52 | 1,666 | 0 | 6 |
| 29 | 2018 | 16–21 | 43.2% | #48 | 1,677 | 0 | 4 | 2008 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #836 | 1,579 | 0 | 6 |
| 30 | 2019 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #176 | 1,608 | 0 | 4 | 2009 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #590 | 1,533 | 0 | 6 |