H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Magdalena Rybarikova vs Milagros Sequera H2H: 1-0
Magdalena Rybarikova holds a 1–0 lead over Milagros Sequera in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Magdalena Rybarikova leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Magdalena Rybarikova won the 2006 Prague fourth round 7-6(3) 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SVK
Age 37
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
VEN
Age 45
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 12, 2006* | Prague | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Magdalena Rybarikova | 7-6(3) 6-0 | Milagros Sequera | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Magdalena Rybarikova | #199 | #17 | 2,405 | 1,817 | 188 | 207 | 47.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Milagros Sequera | #1,060 | #48 | 537 | 1,629 | 32 | 51 | 38.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Magdalena Rybarikova | Milagros Sequera | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2006 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #342 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2007 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #231 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2008 | 9–9 | 50.0% | #59 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2009 | 27–26 | 50.9% | #44 | 1,694 | 0 | 1 | 2001 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #153 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2010 | 12–21 | 36.4% | #106 | 1,582 | 0 | 1 | 2002 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #115 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2011 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #71 | 1,607 | 0 | 2 | 2003 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #77 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2012 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #62 | 1,605 | 0 | 3 | 2004 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #134 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2013 | 29–22 | 56.9% | #37 | 1,739 | 0 | 4 | 2005 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #162 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2014 | 20–26 | 43.5% | #50 | 1,691 | 0 | 4 | 2006 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #103 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2015 | 16–22 | 42.1% | #80 | 1,610 | 0 | 4 | 2007 | 12–7 | 63.2% | #74 | 1,609 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2016 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #154 | 1,665 | 0 | 4 | 2008 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #204 | 1,544 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2017 | 19–11 | 63.3% | #20 | 1,794 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2018 | 16–21 | 43.2% | #48 | 1,677 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2019 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #176 | 1,608 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |