H2H data updated: 2026-09-23 00:00 UTC

Magdalena Rybarikova vs Tamira Paszek H2H: 1-1

Magdalena Rybarikova and Tamira Paszek are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Tamira Paszek leads 1–0 on grass, while Magdalena Rybarikova leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Tamira Paszek won the 2016 Nottingham Open second round 6-3 3-1 RET.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Magdalena Rybarikova
Slovak Republic Age 37 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main-draw meetings
Tamira Paszek
Austria Age 35 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Tamira Paszek 6-3 3-1 (ret.) Magdalena Rybarikova #90 Match data Jun 10, 2016* R16 Nottingham Open International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Grass
Magdalena Rybarikova #89 6-1 6-2 Tamira Paszek Match data Aug 28, 2008* R64 US Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Magdalena Rybarikova #199 #17 2,405 1,816 188 209 47.4% 0 0 0 0 4 4
Tamira Paszek #441 #366 169 1,782 100 130 43.5% 0 0 0 1 2 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Magdalena Rybarikova Tamira Paszek
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 2005 1–1 50.0% — 1,512 0 0
15 — — — — — — — 2006 6–2 75.0% — 1,599 0 1
16 — — — — — — — 2007 15–14 51.7% — 1,730 0 1
17 2006 2–2 50.0% #342 1,515 0 0 2008 16–18 47.1% — 1,697 0 1
18 2007 0–2 0.0% #231 1,491 0 0 2009 5–9 35.7% — 1,626 0 1
19 2008 9–9 50.0% #59 1,567 0 0 2010 9–9 50.0% — 1,642 0 2
20 2009 27–26 50.9% #44 1,694 0 1 2011 19–21 47.5% — 1,654 0 2
21 2010 12–21 36.4% #106 1,583 0 1 2012 18–21 46.2% — 1,676 0 3
22 2011 14–14 50.0% #71 1,607 0 2 2013 2–17 10.5% — 1,476 0 3
23 2012 13–16 44.8% #62 1,604 0 3 2014 1–4 20.0% — 1,469 0 3
24 2013 29–22 56.9% #37 1,739 0 4 2015 1–4 20.0% — 1,442 0 3
25 2014 20–26 43.5% #50 1,691 0 4 2016 7–10 41.2% — 1,530 0 3
26 2015 16–22 42.1% #80 1,608 0 4 — — — — — — —
27 2016 6–7 46.2% #154 1,656 0 4 — — — — — — —
28 2017 19–11 63.3% #20 1,793 0 4 — — — — — — —
29 2018 16–22 42.1% #48 1,668 0 4 — — — — — — —
30 2019 5–9 35.7% #176 1,604 0 4 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Magdalena Rybarikova Tamira Paszek
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 5 1 6 83.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 8 8 16 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — —
17 2006 — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2008 16 13 29 55.2% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
18 2007 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 2 5 7 28.6% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
19 2008 5 3 8 62.5% 4 5 9 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2010 9 6 15 60.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
20 2009 17 18 35 48.6% 4 7 11 36.4% 6 1 7 85.7% — — — — 2011 12 13 25 48.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — —
21 2010 6 11 17 35.3% 3 7 10 30.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 2012 8 14 22 36.4% 1 4 5 20.0% 9 3 12 75.0% — — — —
22 2011 10 8 18 55.6% 1 4 5 20.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2013 2 9 11 18.2% 0 4 4 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
23 2012 11 11 22 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2014 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
24 2013 22 14 36 61.1% 1 4 5 20.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 2015 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
25 2014 15 18 33 45.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2016 4 6 10 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
26 2015 10 16 26 38.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2016 5 4 9 55.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2017 10 8 18 55.6% 1 1 2 50.0% 8 2 10 80.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2018 8 14 22 36.4% 3 4 7 42.9% 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2019 4 5 9 44.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 123 132 255 48.2% 25 47 72 34.7% 39 28 67 58.2% 1 2 3 33.3% — 68 79 147 46.3% 9 29 38 23.7% 23 20 43 53.5% 0 2 2 0.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 363/393 of Magdalena Rybarikova's and 206/229 of Tamira Paszek's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Magdalena Rybarikova Tamira Paszek
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
15 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 1/8 0.0 2.0 96.0% 47.2% 0.0% 36.4% 41.7% 45.3% 46.2%
16 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 28/29 0.6 3.3 67.8% 58.4% 39.6% 46.1% 52.3% 52.7% 43.2%
17 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 34/34 0.5 4.5 63.8% 56.6% 41.0% 47.4% 50.0% 50.9% 44.7%
18 2007 2/2 3.0 5.5 59.1% 56.0% 30.9% 60.0% 41.7% 45.3% 40.5% 2009 13/14 1.4 6.1 62.6% 58.8% 40.1% 46.8% 44.9% 52.1% 44.4%
19 2008 13/18 3.4 3.6 60.5% 66.1% 46.3% 55.9% 60.8% 58.4% 45.3% 2010 16/18 1.4 4.7 60.8% 64.2% 47.1% 48.2% 50.7% 57.5% 46.6%
20 2009 46/53 3.7 4.0 58.8% 64.9% 43.5% 52.9% 49.3% 56.0% 42.7% 2011 38/40 2.1 3.9 59.3% 60.4% 46.4% 46.4% 55.5% 54.5% 42.5%
21 2010 32/33 4.3 2.7 59.0% 64.9% 43.4% 44.4% 43.2% 55.9% 40.8% 2012 38/39 2.0 3.7 60.6% 59.3% 44.2% 56.2% 49.2% 53.5% 43.1%
22 2011 27/28 4.6 3.7 53.1% 69.6% 48.3% 57.0% 42.5% 59.5% 42.1% 2013 16/19 1.0 4.4 62.8% 54.4% 37.2% 49.7% 33.5% 48.1% 37.2%
23 2012 25/29 3.6 2.3 53.9% 66.3% 42.2% 52.5% 55.8% 55.1% 44.3% 2014 5/5 1.8 4.6 62.3% 60.1% 48.7% 45.5% 54.6% 55.5% 39.3%
24 2013 49/51 2.9 3.1 56.7% 65.1% 42.5% 51.1% 49.4% 55.1% 44.6% 2015 2/5 0.5 6.5 58.8% 57.8% 48.6% 41.3% 16.7% 53.9% 30.4%
25 2014 45/46 3.1 2.3 58.8% 62.6% 46.3% 55.1% 42.7% 55.9% 41.1% 2016 15/18 1.9 3.4 65.1% 56.6% 36.7% 43.8% 48.3% 49.8% 44.4%
26 2015 31/38 3.4 2.6 60.4% 64.8% 48.5% 49.4% 50.0% 58.7% 40.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 2016 12/13 4.6 3.8 54.2% 63.0% 40.9% 57.0% 47.0% 52.9% 40.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
28 2017 30/30 3.8 2.1 57.2% 66.5% 44.9% 55.5% 51.5% 57.4% 44.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 2018 37/38 3.3 2.4 57.2% 66.1% 46.5% 52.9% 48.3% 57.6% 42.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2019 14/14 3.4 2.6 57.1% 63.4% 45.2% 55.4% 43.0% 55.7% 35.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 363/397 3.6 2.9 57.5% 65.2% 44.8% 52.7% 48.1% 56.5% 42.3% — 206/231 1.4 4.1 62.7% 58.6% 42.3% 48.4% 49.2% 52.7% 43.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Magdalena Rybarikova Tamira Paszek
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1512 102.6 — — — — — — — 40.0% -1.80 1–0 1–0 — +0.21
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1599 117.1 -2.20 -1.38 0.844 45.8% +6 — — 66.7% +1.17 2–2 (50%) — — +0.29
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1730 133.4 -1.27 +0.75 0.913 47.9% -48 -179 +7 50.7% -0.37 5–4 (56%) 4–2 (67%) 104.0 -1.44
17 2006 1515 103.4 — — — — — +33 — 50.0% +0.30 1–1 2–2 (50%) — -0.12 2008 1697 129.0 -3.26 +1.42 0.909 47.8% +12 -213 — 47.4% -0.25 8–4 (67%) 3–0 (100%) 108.1 -1.57
18 2007 1491 95.9 -3.33 -1.31 0.740 43.2% — — — 0.0% -3.25 — — — -0.10 2009 1626 108.4 -2.23 +0.93 0.929 48.2% +26 -113 — 43.8% -0.53 2–4 (33%) 0–2 — -0.05
19 2008 1568 122.6 +0.91 -0.05 1.089 51.6% -13 +17 — 55.9% +0.79 1–1 1–4 (20%) — +0.60 2010 1643 118.8 -0.31 +0.77 1.096 52.0% +37 — — 52.4% +0.21 2–4 (33%) 2–4 (33%) 97.8 +1.13
20 2009 1694 132.9 +0.77 -0.53 0.971 49.4% -18 -136 +36 48.0% -0.26 13–8 (62%) 7–5 (58%) 107.5 -0.63 2011 1654 118.4 -0.83 -1.22 0.934 48.7% -29 -208 +84 44.9% -0.32 11–4 (73%) 5–5 (50%) 105.7 +0.40
21 2010 1583 120.0 +0.50 -2.50 0.926 48.2% +35 -79 +136 38.7% -0.72 4–7 (36%) 3–6 (33%) 92.3 -1.41 2012 1676 126.3 -1.34 -0.35 0.926 48.5% -91 -243 +189 45.0% -0.36 8–2 (80%) 5–7 (42%) 105.1 -1.21
22 2011 1608 121.7 +2.01 -1.24 1.040 50.8% +32 -135 +113 52.5% +0.49 6–5 (55%) 1–5 (17%) 96.8 +0.48 2013 1476 92.5 -4.43 -3.94 0.718 42.8% +20 -113 +289 13.9% -2.69 1–3 (25%) 1–2 (33%) 96.6 +1.10
23 2012 1604 117.5 -0.46 -0.72 0.986 49.9% +27 -127 — 47.5% -0.26 4–3 (57%) 3–3 (50%) 100.5 +0.36 2014 1469 105.3 -0.61 -1.02 0.882 47.8% — — — 38.5% -1.00 0–3 (0%) 2–0 — -0.22
24 2013 1739 135.3 -0.28 +0.80 0.993 50.0% +32 -307 -38 55.9% +0.32 11–6 (65%) 7–7 (50%) 105.7 +0.82 2015 1442 101.2 -2.43 -3.45 0.659 42.2% +34 — — 27.3% -1.27 0–1 1–1 — +0.30
25 2014 1691 127.1 +0.14 -1.62 0.932 48.4% +14 -239 +3 45.4% -0.52 7–8 (47%) 1–3 (25%) 97.4 -1.04 2016 1531 112.6 -3.82 +0.69 0.885 47.2% -40 — +186 38.2% -0.88 3–1 (75%) 1–1 — -0.03
26 2015 1609 119.9 +0.16 -0.43 0.980 49.6% -9 -135 +81 40.5% -0.61 5–4 (56%) 3–9 (25%) 97.9 +0.28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2016 1657 123.3 -1.07 -1.08 0.856 47.0% +10 — -5 46.2% -0.73 4–2 (67%) 1–0 — -0.81 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2017 1794 139.4 +1.44 +1.79 1.038 51.1% -39 — +22 60.0% +0.44 5–1 (83%) 5–4 (56%) 106.1 -1.73 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2018 1668 129.9 +1.21 -0.59 0.998 49.6% -31 -170 +141 46.3% -0.15 5–7 (42%) 2–2 (50%) 98.8 +0.32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2019 1605 113.4 -1.48 -4.35 0.794 45.6% +54 — +173 36.7% -1.17 3–1 (75%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 1510 — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1816 132.8 +0.42 -0.68 0.971 49.4% +7 -121 +61 47.9% -0.18 69–54 (56%) 38–51 (43%) 100.2 -0.69 — 1783 124.5 -1.95 -0.16 0.910 48.0% -16 -177 +137 44.1% -0.50 43–32 (57%) 25–24 (51%) 108.2 -0.48

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.