H2H data updated: 2026-08-08 02:15 UTC
Magdalena Rybarikova vs Tamira Paszek H2H: 1-1
Magdalena Rybarikova and Tamira Paszek are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Tamira Paszek leads 1–0 on grass, while Magdalena Rybarikova leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Tamira Paszek won the 2016 Nottingham fourth round 6-3 3-1 RET.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SVK
Age 37
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
AUT
Age 35
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Winner | Score | Loser | Match Data | Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tamira Paszek | 6-3 3-1 (ret.) | Magdalena Rybarikova | Match data | Jun 10, 2016* | Nottingham | WTA 250 | R16 | Grass |
| Magdalena Rybarikova | 6-1 6-2 | Tamira Paszek | Match data | Aug 28, 2008* | US Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Magdalena Rybarikova | #199 | #17 | 2,405 | 1,819 | 188 | 207 | 47.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Tamira Paszek | #446 | #299 | 230 | 1,782 | 100 | 129 | 43.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Magdalena Rybarikova | Tamira Paszek | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 6–2 | 75.0% | — | 1,599 | 0 | 1 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 15–14 | 51.7% | — | 1,730 | 0 | 1 |
| 17 | 2006 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #342 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 16–18 | 47.1% | — | 1,697 | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | 2007 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #231 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 5–9 | 35.7% | — | 1,626 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 2008 | 9–9 | 50.0% | #59 | 1,567 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 9–9 | 50.0% | — | 1,642 | 0 | 2 |
| 20 | 2009 | 27–26 | 50.9% | #44 | 1,694 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 19–21 | 47.5% | — | 1,654 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 2010 | 12–21 | 36.4% | #106 | 1,583 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 18–21 | 46.2% | — | 1,676 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 2011 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #71 | 1,607 | 0 | 2 | 2013 | 2–17 | 10.5% | — | 1,476 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 2012 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #62 | 1,604 | 0 | 3 | 2014 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,469 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 2013 | 29–22 | 56.9% | #37 | 1,739 | 0 | 4 | 2015 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,442 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2014 | 20–26 | 43.5% | #50 | 1,691 | 0 | 4 | 2016 | 7–9 | 43.8% | — | 1,519 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2015 | 16–22 | 42.1% | #80 | 1,609 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2016 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #154 | 1,667 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2017 | 19–11 | 63.3% | #20 | 1,796 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2018 | 16–21 | 43.2% | #48 | 1,680 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2019 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #176 | 1,610 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |