H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Magui Serna vs Angelika Roesch H2H: 1-1
Magui Serna and Angelika Roesch are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Angelika Roesch leads 1–0 on carpet, while Magui Serna leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Magui Serna won the 2003 Budapest third round 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 47
Left-Handed
167 cm / 5'6"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
GER
Age 49
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 17, 2003* | Budapest | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Magui Serna | 6-4 6-2 | Angelika Roesch | Match data |
| Feb 13, 2003* | Antwerp | WTA 500 | R32 | Carpet | Angelika Roesch | 6-7(3) 6-1 6-1 | Magui Serna | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Magui Serna | #1,293 | #19 | 1,330 | 1,848 | 186 | 187 | 49.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Angelika Roesch | #819 | #69 | 514 | 1,552 | 10 | 27 | 27.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Magui Serna | Angelika Roesch | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #164 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1997 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #41 | 1,662 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1998 | 26–24 | 52.0% | #24 | 1,801 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1999 | 19–27 | 41.3% | #39 | 1,654 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2000 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #37 | 1,670 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2001 | 29–29 | 50.0% | #26 | 1,653 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2002 | 24–24 | 50.0% | #50 | 1,639 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2003 | 37–23 | 61.7% | #22 | 1,746 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2004 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #103 | 1,654 | 0 | 3 | 2002 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #81 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2005 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #379 | 1,629 | 0 | 3 | 2003 | 4–15 | 21.1% | #210 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #220 | 1,471 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #210 | 1,466 | 0 | 0 |