H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Mandy Minella vs Anne Keothavong H2H: 0-1

Anne Keothavong holds a 1–0 lead over Mandy Minella in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Anne Keothavong leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Anne Keothavong won the 2011 Luxembourg round of 32 6-3 1-6 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Mandy Minella
Luxembourg Age 40 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Anne Keothavong
GBR Age 42 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Anne Keothavong #93 6-3 1-6 6-3 Mandy Minella #122 Match data Oct 20, 2011* R32 Luxembourg International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Mandy Minella #787 #66 955 1,646 58 100 36.7% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Anne Keothavong #287 #48 1,315 1,633 48 90 34.8% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Mandy Minella Anne Keothavong
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 2001 0–1 0.0% #271 1,486 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 2002 0–1 0.0% #236 1,475 0 0
19 2005 0–2 0.0% #249 1,477 0 0 2003 0–2 0.0% #177 1,464 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 2004 2–4 33.3% #180 1,485 0 0
21 — — — — — — — 2005 1–3 25.0% #236 1,466 0 0
22 2008 0–1 0.0% #330 1,474 0 0 2006 0–7 0.0% #144 1,400 0 0
23 2009 0–1 0.0% #243 1,465 0 0 2007 3–5 37.5% #132 1,425 0 0
24 2010 2–2 50.0% #136 1,504 0 0 2008 4–8 33.3% #60 1,464 0 0
25 2011 2–6 25.0% #110 1,472 0 0 2009 13–15 46.4% #100 1,540 0 0
26 2012 11–14 44.0% #77 1,515 0 0 2010 11–13 45.8% #121 1,613 0 0
27 2013 12–18 40.0% #106 1,530 0 0 2011 8–9 47.1% #72 1,617 0 0
28 2014 1–5 16.7% #181 1,496 0 0 2012 6–18 25.0% #143 1,526 0 0
29 2015 1–5 16.7% #168 1,449 0 0 2013 0–4 0.0% #287 1,481 0 0
30 2016 8–7 53.3% #105 1,557 0 1 — — — — — — —
31 2017 9–13 40.9% #143 1,576 0 1 — — — — — — —
32 2018 7–7 50.0% #103 1,615 0 1 — — — — — — —
33 2019 3–11 21.4% #141 1,548 0 1 — — — — — — —
34 2020 0–1 0.0% #170 1,535 0 1 — — — — — — —
35 2021 2–7 22.2% #262 1,537 0 1 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Mandy Minella Anne Keothavong
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
19 2005 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2003 — — — — — — — — 0 2 2 0.0%
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0%
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0%
22 2008 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2006 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0%
23 2009 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2007 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 0 3 3 0.0%
24 2010 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2008 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0%
25 2011 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2009 7 7 14 50.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
26 2012 7 6 13 53.8% 4 7 11 36.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 2010 8 8 16 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
27 2013 4 9 13 30.8% 8 8 16 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2011 7 7 14 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
28 2014 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2012 4 11 15 26.7% 0 3 3 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3%
29 2015 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2013 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0%
30 2016 1 5 6 16.7% 6 1 7 85.7% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2017 6 7 13 46.2% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2018 3 3 6 50.0% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2019 0 3 3 0.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2020 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2021 1 4 5 20.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 27 55 82 32.9% 30 37 67 44.8% 1 8 9 11.1% — 33 47 80 41.2% 7 12 19 36.8% 8 31 39 20.5%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 144/156 of Mandy Minella's and 111/136 of Anne Keothavong's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Mandy Minella Anne Keothavong
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2003 1/2 1.0 5.0 55.0% 54.5% 27.8% 50.0% 0.0% 42.5% 32.6%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2004 1/6 1.0 3.0 57.1% 50.0% 38.1% 44.4% 25.0% 44.9% 34.0%
21 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2005 1/4 0.0 2.0 59.1% 46.2% 22.2% 14.3% 100.0% 36.4% 31.6%
22 2008 1/1 1.0 3.0 56.6% 43.3% 34.8% 45.5% 100.0% 39.6% 17.2% 2006 3/7 1.3 2.0 56.9% 47.1% 38.4% 35.5% 54.5% 43.8% 31.0%
23 2009 1/1 1.0 4.0 54.3% 56.0% 45.2% 27.3% 50.0% 51.1% 46.7% 2007 8/8 1.9 4.0 52.9% 60.9% 38.8% 41.8% 52.7% 51.0% 45.5%
24 2010 4/4 0.3 3.5 61.3% 63.2% 47.1% 58.6% 26.0% 57.1% 41.4% 2008 12/12 2.4 3.5 57.9% 61.2% 40.5% 43.7% 40.4% 52.6% 45.2%
25 2011 6/8 2.2 3.2 56.2% 63.3% 39.8% 58.7% 52.7% 52.9% 38.1% 2009 24/28 2.6 3.0 58.7% 62.7% 45.1% 56.9% 43.0% 55.3% 44.6%
26 2012 24/25 1.7 3.1 60.8% 57.7% 41.7% 55.6% 49.8% 51.6% 41.9% 2010 21/24 1.7 3.1 57.4% 58.4% 44.8% 44.3% 48.3% 52.3% 44.6%
27 2013 25/30 2.3 2.3 61.6% 61.4% 45.2% 47.9% 50.5% 55.0% 42.2% 2011 15/17 1.4 3.7 58.8% 61.8% 48.1% 55.3% 52.1% 56.4% 44.6%
28 2014 4/6 3.3 3.3 59.6% 59.0% 46.7% 53.7% 55.3% 54.5% 42.7% 2012 21/24 2.6 4.3 53.8% 57.4% 40.5% 43.9% 41.0% 49.7% 39.4%
29 2015 4/6 1.0 1.5 75.9% 52.7% 50.0% 42.1% 44.0% 52.2% 43.0% 2013 4/4 2.0 3.8 56.5% 47.2% 45.0% 45.8% 35.8% 46.4% 37.4%
30 2016 15/15 2.1 2.9 63.0% 62.2% 46.3% 52.9% 50.1% 56.2% 43.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2017 22/22 2.9 1.7 61.2% 61.3% 43.0% 50.3% 53.3% 54.0% 39.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2018 14/14 1.9 1.8 64.2% 60.6% 46.1% 59.5% 53.6% 55.3% 43.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2019 14/14 1.9 2.1 66.3% 58.8% 46.3% 42.2% 40.4% 54.7% 39.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2020 1/1 14.0 2.0 56.1% 78.3% 36.1% 80.0% 0.0% 59.8% 32.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2021 9/9 4.9 1.8 59.9% 55.3% 41.5% 39.1% 53.5% 49.9% 43.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 144/158 2.3 2.4 62.1% 59.9% 44.2% 50.9% 49.6% 53.9% 41.5% — 111/138 2.1 3.5 56.8% 59.2% 43.0% 47.8% 45.3% 52.2% 42.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Mandy Minella Anne Keothavong
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 1486 99.5 — — — — — — — 33.3% -0.33 0–1 — — +0.13
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1476 98.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.00 — 0–1 — +0.04
19 2005 1477 97.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.75 — — — -0.08 2003 1465 96.7 -0.21 -0.44 0.567 37.2% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.14
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 1486 100.8 -1.08 -0.67 0.618 39.6% — — -13 43.8% -0.81 1–3 (25%) 2–0 — -0.30
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1467 93.4 -2.33 -1.56 0.496 34.1% — — — 25.0% -1.88 — — — +0.24
22 2008 1474 104.0 +0.43 -0.56 0.286 31.7% — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — -0.25 2006 1401 89.0 -3.21 -4.76 0.551 37.7% +51 — -4 6.7% -3.53 0–1 1–0 — -0.03
23 2009 1466 100.5 +0.41 -1.66 0.954 48.7% — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 — — -0.07 2007 1425 100.9 -2.40 +0.38 0.930 48.4% +60 — -67 44.4% -0.44 0–2 0–2 — +0.41
24 2010 1504 115.0 +0.56 +1.62 0.965 49.2% +11 — — 50.0% -0.25 — — — -0.16 2008 1465 118.5 -1.50 +0.68 0.954 48.9% +49 — -108 35.7% -0.57 2–2 (50%) 1–2 (33%) 101.0 +0.21
25 2011 1473 100.2 -1.79 -2.50 0.809 46.5% +18 — — 33.3% -1.24 2–3 (40%) 1–0 — +0.53 2009 1540 114.7 -0.29 -0.29 0.999 50.0% +25 +44 -156 46.8% -0.50 3–5 (38%) 6–2 (75%) 101.8 +1.51
26 2012 1515 104.1 -2.82 -1.73 0.865 47.1% +13 +39 — 41.7% -0.78 7–3 (70%) 2–4 (33%) 103.3 +1.92 2010 1613 116.3 -2.69 +0.49 0.935 48.4% +3 -16 -248 44.6% -0.57 5–5 (50%) 1–1 — -0.61
27 2013 1530 114.7 -0.44 -1.67 0.939 48.7% -27 +47 — 40.3% -0.65 7–5 (58%) 3–4 (43%) 104.1 +0.65 2011 1618 117.6 +0.58 +1.18 1.022 50.6% +10 — — 51.2% +0.15 2–5 (29%) 0–2 — +0.35
28 2014 1497 105.8 -1.89 -0.14 0.938 48.7% -22 — — 23.1% -1.46 0–1 — — -0.11 2012 1527 113.8 -3.60 -2.34 0.783 44.5% +33 -4 -99 35.2% -1.00 1–7 (13%) 2–2 (50%) 94.2 -0.95
29 2015 1449 99.2 -1.50 -0.06 0.898 47.4% — +69 — 26.7% -1.27 1–2 (33%) — — +0.30 2013 1481 97.1 -3.69 -0.76 0.696 42.0% — — — 0.0% -3.38 — — — -0.11
30 2016 1557 110.4 -0.20 -0.12 0.990 50.0% -122 +110 — 51.6% -0.06 3–4 (43%) 3–2 (60%) 101.8 -0.48 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2017 1577 112.5 -1.48 -2.69 0.863 47.2% -14 +86 -35 43.1% -0.90 3–4 (43%) 4–0 (100%) 104.7 +0.14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2018 1616 112.5 -0.68 -0.84 0.978 49.8% -45 +52 — 46.4% -0.18 1–1 1–3 (25%) — -0.14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2019 1549 114.7 -0.94 -2.06 0.869 47.0% -39 +79 — 32.4% -1.03 1–5 (17%) 2–2 (50%) 96.0 -0.47 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2020 1536 101.2 -3.10 +0.34 0.804 47.3% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — +0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2021 1537 108.6 -3.18 -1.37 0.870 46.8% -39 +69 — 29.4% -1.06 0–1 0–1 — +0.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2022 1500 100.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1646 113.9 -1.32 -1.45 0.899 47.9% -22 +64 -35 38.8% -0.81 25–30 (45%) 16–16 (50%) 102.2 +1.20 — 1633 113.5 -1.76 -0.33 0.896 47.5% +25 +21 -101 39.3% -0.82 14–31 (31%) 13–12 (52%) 92.4 +0.54

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.