H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Mandy Minella vs Jarmila Wolfe H2H: 0-1

Jarmila Wolfe holds a 1–0 lead over Mandy Minella in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jarmila Wolfe leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jarmila Wolfe won the 2011 Guangzhou Open round of 16 4-6 6-2 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Mandy Minella
Luxembourg Age 40 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Jarmila Wolfe
AUS Age 39 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Jarmila Wolfe #34 4-6 6-2 6-3 Mandy Minella #166 Match data Sep 23, 2011* R16 Guangzhou Open International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Mandy Minella #787 #66 955 1,646 58 100 36.7% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Jarmila Wolfe #623 #25 2,060 1,800 104 137 43.2% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Mandy Minella Jarmila Wolfe
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 2003 2–1 66.7% #195 1,532 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 2004 0–1 0.0% #222 1,515 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 2005 2–2 50.0% #147 1,537 0 0
19 2005 0–2 0.0% #249 1,477 0 0 2006 8–12 40.0% #69 1,533 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 2007 6–14 30.0% #142 1,475 0 0
21 — — — — — — — 2008 3–6 33.3% #99 1,504 0 0
22 2008 0–1 0.0% #330 1,474 0 0 2009 9–14 39.1% #110 1,562 0 0
23 2009 0–1 0.0% #243 1,465 0 0 2010 19–12 61.3% #42 1,688 0 1
24 2010 2–2 50.0% #136 1,504 0 0 2011 28–23 54.9% #33 1,697 0 2
25 2011 2–6 25.0% #110 1,472 0 0 2012 7–19 26.9% #183 1,510 0 2
26 2012 11–14 44.0% #77 1,515 0 0 2013 3–3 50.0% #238 1,535 0 2
27 2013 12–18 40.0% #106 1,530 0 0 2014 6–10 37.5% #71 1,553 0 2
28 2014 1–5 16.7% #181 1,496 0 0 2015 11–18 37.9% #105 1,537 0 2
29 2015 1–5 16.7% #168 1,449 0 0 2016 0–2 0.0% #624 1,479 0 2
30 2016 8–7 53.3% #105 1,557 0 1 — — — — — — —
31 2017 9–13 40.9% #143 1,576 0 1 — — — — — — —
32 2018 7–7 50.0% #103 1,615 0 1 — — — — — — —
33 2019 3–11 21.4% #141 1,548 0 1 — — — — — — —
34 2020 0–1 0.0% #170 1,535 0 1 — — — — — — —
35 2021 2–7 22.2% #262 1,537 0 1 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Mandy Minella Jarmila Wolfe
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2005 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 6 6 12 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 2 10 12 16.7% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 3 3 6 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
22 2008 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 2 8 10 20.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
23 2009 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 10 7 17 58.8% 5 3 8 62.5% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
24 2010 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 18 16 34 52.9% 8 5 13 61.5% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
25 2011 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2012 5 12 17 29.4% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 2012 7 6 13 53.8% 4 7 11 36.4% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2013 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2013 4 9 13 30.8% 8 8 16 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2014 5 8 13 38.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
28 2014 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2015 9 11 20 45.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — —
29 2015 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — 2016 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2016 1 5 6 16.7% 6 1 7 85.7% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2017 6 7 13 46.2% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2018 3 3 6 50.0% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2019 0 3 3 0.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2020 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2021 1 4 5 20.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 27 55 82 32.9% 30 37 67 44.8% 1 8 9 11.1% — — — — — 65 89 154 42.2% 27 29 56 48.2% 12 18 30 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 144/156 of Mandy Minella's and 42/47 of Jarmila Wolfe's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Mandy Minella Jarmila Wolfe
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
22 2008 1/1 1.0 3.0 56.6% 43.3% 34.8% 45.5% 100.0% 39.6% 17.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 2009 1/1 1.0 4.0 54.3% 56.0% 45.2% 27.3% 50.0% 51.1% 46.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 2010 4/4 0.3 3.5 61.3% 63.2% 47.1% 58.6% 26.0% 57.1% 41.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
25 2011 6/8 2.2 3.2 56.2% 63.3% 39.8% 58.7% 52.7% 52.9% 38.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
26 2012 24/25 1.7 3.1 60.8% 57.7% 41.7% 55.6% 49.8% 51.6% 41.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 2013 25/30 2.3 2.3 61.6% 61.4% 45.2% 47.9% 50.5% 55.0% 42.2% 2014 15/16 5.6 3.9 58.1% 67.2% 45.9% 47.1% 47.4% 57.9% 40.9%
28 2014 4/6 3.3 3.3 59.6% 59.0% 46.7% 53.7% 55.3% 54.5% 42.7% 2015 25/29 4.2 3.7 59.2% 65.8% 47.6% 45.6% 40.9% 58.3% 38.4%
29 2015 4/6 1.0 1.5 75.9% 52.7% 50.0% 42.1% 44.0% 52.2% 43.0% 2016 2/2 6.0 5.5 58.3% 61.4% 31.9% 50.0% 29.2% 49.2% 37.1%
30 2016 15/15 2.1 2.9 63.0% 62.2% 46.3% 52.9% 50.1% 56.2% 43.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2017 22/22 2.9 1.7 61.2% 61.3% 43.0% 50.3% 53.3% 54.0% 39.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2018 14/14 1.9 1.8 64.2% 60.6% 46.1% 59.5% 53.6% 55.3% 43.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2019 14/14 1.9 2.1 66.3% 58.8% 46.3% 42.2% 40.4% 54.7% 39.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2020 1/1 14.0 2.0 56.1% 78.3% 36.1% 80.0% 0.0% 59.8% 32.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2021 9/9 4.9 1.8 59.9% 55.3% 41.5% 39.1% 53.5% 49.9% 43.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 144/158 2.3 2.4 62.1% 59.9% 44.2% 50.9% 49.6% 53.9% 41.5% — 42/241 4.8 3.9 58.8% 66.1% 46.3% 46.4% 42.7% 57.7% 39.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Mandy Minella Jarmila Wolfe
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 1532 109.1 — — — — — +33 — 66.7% +1.17 — — — -0.09
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 1515 97.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — +0.08
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1538 107.7 — — — — -8 — — 50.0% -0.63 — 1–0 — +0.03
19 2005 1477 97.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.75 — — — -0.08 2006 1533 102.2 — — — — 0 +11 +27 40.9% -0.55 2–2 (50%) 1–2 (33%) 98.8 +1.14
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1475 97.8 — — — — -41 +56 — 35.6% -0.98 1–4 (20%) 0–2 — +0.59
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1505 117.9 — — — — -2 — — 35.0% -1.15 1–1 2–3 (40%) — -0.54
22 2008 1474 104.0 +0.43 -0.56 0.286 31.7% — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — -0.25 2009 1563 119.3 — — — — -98 +18 +22 43.4% -0.75 2–5 (29%) 2–3 (40%) 97.3 -0.65
23 2009 1466 100.5 +0.41 -1.66 0.954 48.7% — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 — — -0.07 2010 1689 133.8 — — — — -92 -65 -29 61.4% +1.03 3–5 (38%) 3–5 (38%) 98.5 +1.85
24 2010 1504 115.0 +0.56 +1.62 0.965 49.2% +11 — — 50.0% -0.25 — — — -0.16 2011 1698 138.0 — — — — -35 -1 -32 55.3% +0.24 5–9 (36%) 9–4 (69%) 101.3 -1.13
25 2011 1473 100.2 -1.79 -2.50 0.809 46.5% +18 — — 33.3% -1.24 2–3 (40%) 1–0 — +0.53 2012 1510 111.2 — — — — +23 +130 — 33.3% -1.22 4–8 (33%) 3–4 (43%) 93.6 +0.36
26 2012 1515 104.1 -2.82 -1.73 0.865 47.1% +13 +39 — 41.7% -0.78 7–3 (70%) 2–4 (33%) 103.3 +1.92 2013 1535 111.3 — — — — +14 — — 50.0% +0.14 1–1 — — +0.26
27 2013 1530 114.7 -0.44 -1.67 0.939 48.7% -27 +47 — 40.3% -0.65 7–5 (58%) 3–4 (43%) 104.1 +0.65 2014 1554 120.0 +0.80 -1.14 0.972 49.3% +14 — — 47.4% -0.03 2–6 (25%) 2–2 (50%) 97.6 +0.49
28 2014 1497 105.8 -1.89 -0.14 0.938 48.7% -22 — — 23.1% -1.46 0–1 — — -0.11 2015 1537 122.3 +0.24 -2.00 0.920 48.3% +41 +43 +60 44.1% -0.62 4–8 (33%) 3–4 (43%) 96.9 -0.27
29 2015 1449 99.2 -1.50 -0.06 0.898 47.4% — +69 — 26.7% -1.27 1–2 (33%) — — +0.30 2016 1480 93.6 -1.39 +0.21 0.729 43.2% — — — 20.0% -2.00 0–1 1–1 — +0.07
30 2016 1557 110.4 -0.20 -0.12 0.990 50.0% -122 +110 — 51.6% -0.06 3–4 (43%) 3–2 (60%) 101.8 -0.48 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2017 1577 112.5 -1.48 -2.69 0.863 47.2% -14 +86 -35 43.1% -0.90 3–4 (43%) 4–0 (100%) 104.7 +0.14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2018 1616 112.5 -0.68 -0.84 0.978 49.8% -45 +52 — 46.4% -0.18 1–1 1–3 (25%) — -0.14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2019 1549 114.7 -0.94 -2.06 0.869 47.0% -39 +79 — 32.4% -1.03 1–5 (17%) 2–2 (50%) 96.0 -0.47 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2020 1536 101.2 -3.10 +0.34 0.804 47.3% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — +0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2021 1537 108.6 -3.18 -1.37 0.870 46.8% -39 +69 — 29.4% -1.06 0–1 0–1 — +0.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2022 1500 100.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1646 113.9 -1.32 -1.45 0.899 47.9% -22 +64 -35 38.8% -0.81 25–30 (45%) 16–16 (50%) 102.2 +1.20 — 1801 126.0 +0.36 -1.59 0.927 48.4% -18 +22 +9 46.4% -0.29 25–50 (33%) 27–30 (47%) 92.4 +0.91

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.