H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Mandy Minella vs Jelena Jankovic H2H: 0-1
Jelena Jankovic holds a 1–0 lead over Mandy Minella in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jelena Jankovic leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jelena Jankovic won the 2015 Luxembourg third round 6-1 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
LUX
Age 40
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
SRB
Age 41
Right-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 22, 2015* | Luxembourg | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Jelena Jankovic | 6-1 6-4 | Mandy Minella | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mandy Minella | #787 | #66 | 955 | 1,644 | 58 | 102 | 36.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Jelena Jankovic | #970 | #1 | 9,200 | 2,132 | 547 | 332 | 62.2% | 0 | 6 | 0 | 3 | 6 | 15 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Mandy Minella | Jelena Jankovic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #364 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #196 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #85 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2005 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #249 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 27–25 | 51.9% | #28 | 1,754 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 36–29 | 55.4% | #22 | 1,732 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 45–28 | 61.6% | #12 | 1,915 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #330 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 73–26 | 73.7% | #3 | 1,966 | 0 | 5 |
| 23 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #243 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 63–18 | 77.8% | #1 | 2,087 | 0 | 9 |
| 24 | 2010 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #136 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 42–19 | 68.9% | #8 | 1,948 | 0 | 11 |
| 25 | 2011 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #110 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 35–22 | 61.4% | #8 | 1,794 | 0 | 12 |
| 26 | 2012 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #77 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 38–22 | 63.3% | #14 | 1,804 | 0 | 12 |
| 27 | 2013 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #106 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 31–27 | 53.4% | #22 | 1,737 | 0 | 12 |
| 28 | 2014 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #181 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 46–21 | 68.7% | #8 | 1,918 | 0 | 13 |
| 29 | 2015 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #168 | 1,449 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 38–22 | 63.3% | #15 | 1,795 | 0 | 13 |
| 30 | 2016 | 8–8 | 50.0% | #105 | 1,543 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 39–21 | 65.0% | #21 | 1,851 | 0 | 15 |
| 31 | 2017 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #143 | 1,570 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 21–19 | 52.5% | #54 | 1,738 | 0 | 15 |
| 32 | 2018 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #103 | 1,613 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 6–19 | 24.0% | #158 | 1,576 | 0 | 15 |
| 33 | 2019 | 3–12 | 20.0% | #141 | 1,542 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #170 | 1,529 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2021 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #262 | 1,533 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |