H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Mandy Minella vs Lourdes Domínguez Lino H2H: 0-3

Lourdes Domínguez Lino holds a 3–0 lead over Mandy Minella in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Lourdes Domínguez Lino leads 3–0 on clay. Most recently, Lourdes Domínguez Lino won the 2013 Nuremberg round of 16 6-1 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Mandy Minella
Luxembourg Age 40 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0 – 3
3 main-draw meetings
Lourdes Domínguez Lino
Spain Age 45 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Lourdes Domínguez Lino #50 6-1 6-4 Mandy Minella #77 Match data Jun 14, 2013* R16 Nuremberg International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Clay
Lourdes Domínguez Lino #59 2-6 6-0 6-1 Mandy Minella #91 Match data Apr 27, 2013* SF Marrakech International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Clay
Lourdes Domínguez Lino #77 6-1 6-4 Mandy Minella #138 Match data Feb 17, 2011* R32 Bogotá Open International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Mandy Minella #787 #66 955 1,646 58 100 36.7% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Lourdes Domínguez Lino #1,129 #40 1,305 1,673 125 157 44.3% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Mandy Minella Lourdes Domínguez Lino
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 2005 0–2 0.0% #249 1,477 0 0 2000 0–1 0.0% #141 1,489 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 2001 0–1 0.0% #378 1,479 0 0
21 — — — — — — — 2002 4–3 57.1% #390 1,518 0 0
22 2008 0–1 0.0% #330 1,474 0 0 2003 0–1 0.0% #319 1,503 0 0
23 2009 0–1 0.0% #243 1,465 0 0 2004 1–1 50.0% #208 1,508 0 0
24 2010 2–2 50.0% #136 1,504 0 0 2005 6–4 60.0% #72 1,553 0 0
25 2011 2–6 25.0% #110 1,472 0 0 2006 21–19 52.5% #52 1,623 0 1
26 2012 11–14 44.0% #77 1,515 0 0 2007 16–21 43.2% #71 1,557 0 1
27 2013 12–18 40.0% #106 1,530 0 0 2008 6–11 35.3% #91 1,507 0 1
28 2014 1–5 16.7% #181 1,496 0 0 2009 6–13 31.6% #134 1,477 0 1
29 2015 1–5 16.7% #168 1,449 0 0 2010 2–4 33.3% #85 1,487 0 1
30 2016 8–7 53.3% #105 1,557 0 1 2011 16–16 50.0% #79 1,574 0 2
31 2017 9–13 40.9% #143 1,576 0 1 2012 16–16 50.0% #48 1,652 0 2
32 2018 7–7 50.0% #103 1,615 0 1 2013 17–22 43.6% #69 1,620 0 2
33 2019 3–11 21.4% #141 1,548 0 1 2014 7–11 38.9% #110 1,568 0 2
34 2020 0–1 0.0% #170 1,535 0 1 2015 4–5 44.4% #100 1,550 0 2
35 2021 2–7 22.2% #262 1,537 0 1 2016 3–8 27.3% #220 1,516 0 2

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Mandy Minella Lourdes Domínguez Lino
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 2005 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — —
22 2008 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
23 2009 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
24 2010 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 — — — — 6 4 10 60.0% — — — — — — — —
25 2011 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2006 7 10 17 41.2% 14 8 22 63.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
26 2012 7 6 13 53.8% 4 7 11 36.4% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2007 3 9 12 25.0% 13 11 24 54.2% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
27 2013 4 9 13 30.8% 8 8 16 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2008 0 4 4 0.0% 6 7 13 46.2% — — — — — — — —
28 2014 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2009 1 3 4 25.0% 5 9 14 35.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
29 2015 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — 2010 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
30 2016 1 5 6 16.7% 6 1 7 85.7% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2011 3 6 9 33.3% 11 8 19 57.9% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
31 2017 6 7 13 46.2% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 2012 10 8 18 55.6% 5 7 12 41.7% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
32 2018 3 3 6 50.0% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2013 1 8 9 11.1% 16 11 27 59.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
33 2019 0 3 3 0.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2014 0 5 5 0.0% 6 5 11 54.5% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
34 2020 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 0 1 1 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — —
35 2021 1 4 5 20.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — 2016 0 3 3 0.0% 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — — — — —
Career — 27 55 82 32.9% 30 37 67 44.8% 1 8 9 11.1% — — — — — 27 59 86 31.4% 94 88 182 51.6% 4 9 13 30.8% 0 1 1 0.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 144/156 of Mandy Minella's and 19/20 of Lourdes Domínguez Lino's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Mandy Minella Lourdes Domínguez Lino
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
22 2008 1/1 1.0 3.0 56.6% 43.3% 34.8% 45.5% 100.0% 39.6% 17.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 2009 1/1 1.0 4.0 54.3% 56.0% 45.2% 27.3% 50.0% 51.1% 46.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 2010 4/4 0.3 3.5 61.3% 63.2% 47.1% 58.6% 26.0% 57.1% 41.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
25 2011 6/8 2.2 3.2 56.2% 63.3% 39.8% 58.7% 52.7% 52.9% 38.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
26 2012 24/25 1.7 3.1 60.8% 57.7% 41.7% 55.6% 49.8% 51.6% 41.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 2013 25/30 2.3 2.3 61.6% 61.4% 45.2% 47.9% 50.5% 55.0% 42.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
28 2014 4/6 3.3 3.3 59.6% 59.0% 46.7% 53.7% 55.3% 54.5% 42.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 2015 4/6 1.0 1.5 75.9% 52.7% 50.0% 42.1% 44.0% 52.2% 43.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2016 15/15 2.1 2.9 63.0% 62.2% 46.3% 52.9% 50.1% 56.2% 43.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2017 22/22 2.9 1.7 61.2% 61.3% 43.0% 50.3% 53.3% 54.0% 39.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2018 14/14 1.9 1.8 64.2% 60.6% 46.1% 59.5% 53.6% 55.3% 43.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2019 14/14 1.9 2.1 66.3% 58.8% 46.3% 42.2% 40.4% 54.7% 39.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2020 1/1 14.0 2.0 56.1% 78.3% 36.1% 80.0% 0.0% 59.8% 32.4% 2015 8/9 0.6 1.8 71.4% 55.2% 52.3% 49.6% 51.7% 53.6% 45.7%
35 2021 9/9 4.9 1.8 59.9% 55.3% 41.5% 39.1% 53.5% 49.9% 43.6% 2016 11/11 0.7 3.0 61.2% 54.4% 41.7% 50.1% 47.0% 49.7% 38.3%
Career — 144/158 2.3 2.4 62.1% 59.9% 44.2% 50.9% 49.6% 53.9% 41.5% — 19/282 0.7 2.5 65.5% 54.7% 46.1% 49.9% 49.0% 51.3% 41.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Mandy Minella Lourdes Domínguez Lino
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
19 2005 1477 97.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.75 — — — -0.08 2000 1489 98.2 — — — — — — — 33.3% -2.33 0–1 1–0 — -0.06
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 1480 100.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.06
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1519 112.4 — — — — — +41 — 57.1% +0.14 — 2–1 (67%) — +0.22
22 2008 1474 104.0 +0.43 -0.56 0.286 31.7% — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — -0.25 2003 1503 98.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.07
23 2009 1466 100.5 +0.41 -1.66 0.954 48.7% — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 — — -0.07 2004 1509 105.8 — — — — — — — 50.0% +1.34 1–1 0–1 — +0.01
24 2010 1504 115.0 +0.56 +1.62 0.965 49.2% +11 — — 50.0% -0.25 — — — -0.16 2005 1553 117.7 — — — — — +72 — 61.9% +0.38 0–1 3–1 (75%) — +0.23
25 2011 1473 100.2 -1.79 -2.50 0.809 46.5% +18 — — 33.3% -1.24 2–3 (40%) 1–0 — +0.53 2006 1623 121.0 — — — — -68 +93 — 51.2% -0.30 4–4 (50%) 5–3 (63%) 102.8 +0.22
26 2012 1515 104.1 -2.82 -1.73 0.865 47.1% +13 +39 — 41.7% -0.78 7–3 (70%) 2–4 (33%) 103.3 +1.92 2007 1558 113.3 — — — — -56 +110 — 43.2% -0.49 4–3 (57%) 2–2 (50%) 100.6 -0.29
27 2013 1530 114.7 -0.44 -1.67 0.939 48.7% -27 +47 — 40.3% -0.65 7–5 (58%) 3–4 (43%) 104.1 +0.65 2008 1508 107.1 — — — — -48 +107 — 37.8% -1.11 1–4 (20%) 1–0 — -0.03
28 2014 1497 105.8 -1.89 -0.14 0.938 48.7% -22 — — 23.1% -1.46 0–1 — — -0.11 2009 1477 108.0 — — — — -35 +83 — 37.8% -0.82 2–5 (29%) 2–5 (29%) 95.2 +0.87
29 2015 1449 99.2 -1.50 -0.06 0.898 47.4% — +69 — 26.7% -1.27 1–2 (33%) — — +0.30 2010 1487 102.6 — — — — 0 — — 35.7% -1.36 1–1 0–1 — +0.13
30 2016 1557 110.4 -0.20 -0.12 0.990 50.0% -122 +110 — 51.6% -0.06 3–4 (43%) 3–2 (60%) 101.8 -0.48 2011 1575 121.5 — — — — -73 0 +20 50.0% +0.11 6–6 (50%) 1–7 (13%) 95.2 +0.42
31 2017 1577 112.5 -1.48 -2.69 0.863 47.2% -14 +86 -35 43.1% -0.90 3–4 (43%) 4–0 (100%) 104.7 +0.14 2012 1653 124.6 — — — — -17 -96 — 54.3% +0.04 2–6 (25%) 4–1 (80%) 100.6 0.00
32 2018 1616 112.5 -0.68 -0.84 0.978 49.8% -45 +52 — 46.4% -0.18 1–1 1–3 (25%) — -0.14 2013 1620 121.2 — — — — -86 +113 — 41.3% -0.81 10–8 (56%) 2–3 (40%) 103.9 -1.33
33 2019 1549 114.7 -0.94 -2.06 0.869 47.0% -39 +79 — 32.4% -1.03 1–5 (17%) 2–2 (50%) 96.0 -0.47 2014 1569 107.5 — — — — -102 +137 — 40.0% -0.89 1–0 1–2 (33%) — +0.57
34 2020 1536 101.2 -3.10 +0.34 0.804 47.3% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — +0.06 2015 1550 113.7 -1.03 +0.35 0.984 50.1% — +126 — 50.0% -0.05 1–3 (25%) 2–0 — +0.51
35 2021 1537 108.6 -3.18 -1.37 0.870 46.8% -39 +69 — 29.4% -1.06 0–1 0–1 — +0.05 2016 1517 97.5 -3.20 -2.29 0.761 44.1% -86 +117 — 25.0% -1.75 2–2 (50%) 0–2 — -0.18
36 2022 1500 100.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1646 113.9 -1.32 -1.45 0.899 47.9% -22 +64 -35 38.8% -0.81 25–30 (45%) 16–16 (50%) 102.2 +1.20 — 1674 120.0 -2.29 -1.18 0.851 46.6% -55 +78 +20 45.2% -0.48 35–45 (44%) 26–29 (47%) 98.8 +0.46

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.