H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Manuela Maleeva Fragniere vs Louise Allen H2H: 2-0
Manuela Maleeva Fragniere holds a 2–0 lead over Louise Allen in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Manuela Maleeva Fragniere leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Manuela Maleeva Fragniere won the 1992 US Open second round 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Age 59
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
Age 64
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 3, 1992* | US Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Manuela Maleeva Fragniere | 6-4 6-2 | Louise Allen | Match data |
| Feb 15, 1990* | Chicago | WTA 1000 | R32 | Carpet | Manuela Maleeva Fragniere | 6-3 6-3 | Louise Allen | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manuela Maleeva Fragniere | #5 | #3 | 148 | 2,128 | 458 | 183 | 71.5% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 14 | 19 |
| Louise Allen | — | — | — | 1,759 | 67 | 100 | 40.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Manuela Maleeva Fragniere | Louise Allen | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1982 | 15–10 | 60.0% | — | 1,688 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1983 | 21–16 | 56.8% | — | 1,788 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1984 | 50–16 | 75.8% | #6 | 2,098 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1985 | 46–18 | 71.9% | #7 | 2,073 | 0 | 6 | 1980 | 3–2 | 60.0% | — | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1986 | 42–21 | 66.7% | #10 | 1,991 | 0 | 6 | 1981 | 6–5 | 54.5% | — | 1,541 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1987 | 44–15 | 74.6% | #8 | 2,111 | 0 | 8 | 1982 | 22–5 | 81.5% | — | 1,737 | 0 | 3 |
| 21 | 1988 | 42–14 | 75.0% | #6 | 2,091 | 0 | 10 | 1983 | 3–7 | 30.0% | — | 1,706 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 1989 | 34–13 | 72.3% | #9 | 2,016 | 0 | 12 | 1984 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,686 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 1990 | 42–16 | 72.4% | #9 | 2,067 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1991 | 43–14 | 75.4% | #10 | 2,027 | 0 | 15 | 1986 | 0–4 | 0.0% | — | 1,612 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 1992 | 31–12 | 72.1% | #9 | 1,994 | 0 | 16 | 1987 | 3–8 | 27.3% | — | 1,565 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 1993 | 36–16 | 69.2% | #11 | 2,045 | 0 | 18 | 1988 | 5–8 | 38.5% | — | 1,584 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 1994 | 12–2 | 85.7% | #5 | 2,066 | 0 | 19 | 1989 | 9–15 | 37.5% | — | 1,561 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 2–9 | 18.2% | — | 1,492 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 2–8 | 20.0% | — | 1,453 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 10–14 | 41.7% | — | 1,577 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 2–14 | 12.5% | — | 1,451 | 0 | 3 |