H2H data updated: 2026-10-29 00:00 UTC

Manuela Maleeva Fragniere vs Patricia Medrado H2H: 2-0

Manuela Maleeva Fragniere holds a 2–0 lead over Patricia Medrado in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Manuela Maleeva Fragniere leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Manuela Maleeva Fragniere won the 1984 Lugano round of 32 6-1 6-3.

SUI Age 59 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main-draw meetings

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Manuela Maleeva Fragniere #16 6-1 6-3 Patricia Medrado #76 Match data May 10, 1984* R32 Lugano WTA 250 Clay
Manuela Maleeva Fragniere 2-6 6-3 6-3 Patricia Medrado Match data Jul 6, 1983* R32 Hittfield WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Manuela Maleeva Fragniere — #3 148 2,131 464 185 71.5% 0 1 0 2 16 19
Patricia Medrado — #67 9 1,837 156 164 48.8% 0 0 0 0 10 10

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Manuela Maleeva Fragniere Patricia Medrado
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1982 15–10 60.0% — 1,687 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1983 21–16 56.8% — 1,789 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1984 50–16 75.8% #6 2,100 0 5 — — — — — — —
18 1985 46–18 71.9% #7 2,075 0 6 1975 3–1 75.0% — 1,535 0 0
19 1986 42–21 66.7% #8 1,992 0 6 1976 0–2 0.0% — 1,517 0 0
20 1987 44–15 74.6% #8 2,114 0 8 1977 2–3 40.0% — 1,527 0 1
21 1988 45–15 75.0% #6 2,102 0 10 1978 10–12 45.5% — 1,626 0 1
22 1989 34–13 72.3% #9 2,019 0 12 1979 3–6 33.3% — 1,632 0 1
23 1990 42–16 72.4% #9 2,068 0 12 1980 22–10 68.8% — 1,656 0 4
24 1991 43–14 75.4% #10 2,028 0 15 1981 38–20 65.5% — 1,740 0 8
25 1992 34–13 72.3% #9 1,998 0 16 1982 33–25 56.9% — 1,779 0 10
26 1993 36–16 69.2% #11 2,046 0 18 1983 4–18 18.2% — 1,577 0 10
27 1994 12–2 85.7% — 2,067 0 19 1984 11–15 42.3% #108 1,588 0 10
28 — — — — — — — 1985 8–14 36.4% — 1,542 0 10
29 — — — — — — — 1986 12–14 46.2% #76 1,562 0 10
30 — — — — — — — 1987 6–13 31.6% #117 1,550 0 10
31 — — — — — — — 1988 4–11 26.7% #180 1,473 0 10

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Manuela Maleeva Fragniere Patricia Medrado
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1982 2 2 4 50.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 6 4 10 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1983 3 2 5 60.0% 16 10 26 61.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1984 5 4 9 55.6% 27 5 32 84.4% 4 1 5 80.0% 14 6 20 70.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1985 7 4 11 63.6% 16 6 22 72.7% 10 3 13 76.9% 13 5 18 72.2% 1975 — — — — 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — —
19 1986 13 5 18 72.2% 13 6 19 68.4% 7 2 9 77.8% 9 8 17 52.9% 1976 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
20 1987 9 3 12 75.0% 19 5 24 79.2% 6 3 9 66.7% 10 4 14 71.4% 1977 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1988 23 5 28 82.1% 9 4 13 69.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 13 5 18 72.2% 1978 7 6 13 53.8% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 0 3 3 0.0%
22 1989 15 5 20 75.0% 11 3 14 78.6% — — — — 8 5 13 61.5% 1979 1 1 2 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
23 1990 19 6 25 76.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 16 6 22 72.7% 1980 — — — — 9 8 17 52.9% — — — — — — — —
24 1991 16 7 23 69.6% 10 3 13 76.9% — — — — 17 4 21 81.0% 1981 6 5 11 54.5% 10 9 19 52.6% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
25 1992 13 4 17 76.5% 13 6 19 68.4% 2 1 3 66.7% 6 2 8 75.0% 1982 2 6 8 25.0% 27 9 36 75.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 9 12 25.0%
26 1993 16 5 21 76.2% 8 7 15 53.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 11 3 14 78.6% 1983 2 7 9 22.2% 2 6 8 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0%
27 1994 4 1 5 80.0% — — — — — — — — 8 1 9 88.9% 1984 3 5 8 37.5% 8 7 15 53.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 1 5 6 16.7% 4 7 11 36.4% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 4 6 10 40.0% 8 6 14 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 1 4 5 20.0% 5 9 14 35.7% — — — — — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 1 3 4 25.0% 3 7 10 30.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
Career — 145 53 198 73.2% 156 62 218 71.6% 38 20 58 65.5% 125 50 175 71.4% — 29 50 79 36.7% 84 75 159 52.8% 1 9 10 10.0% 3 21 24 12.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Manuela Maleeva Fragniere Patricia Medrado
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1982 1688 121.9 — — — — -90 -61 -1 55.2% +0.14 6–2 (75%) 3–3 (50%) 105.4 +1.43 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1983 1789 136.5 — — — — -119 0 -127 57.1% +0.45 4–6 (40%) 2–1 (67%) 99.8 -0.63 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1984 2101 169.3 — — — — -162 +36 -328 70.4% +1.55 13–7 (65%) 6–2 (75%) 112.6 -2.55 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1985 2076 161.5 — — — — -48 +9 -203 70.6% +1.90 6–4 (60%) 5–4 (56%) 99.5 -0.41 1975 1535 102.4 — — — — — +33 — 75.0% +1.25 — — — +0.95
19 1986 1993 161.5 — — — — -5 +31 -52 65.7% +1.31 7–12 (37%) 5–6 (45%) 90.3 -2.26 1976 1517 92.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.25 — — — -0.04
20 1987 2114 165.7 — — — — -24 -9 -172 68.6% +1.51 14–8 (64%) 4–5 (44%) 101.3 -4.28 1977 1528 97.0 — — — — +38 — — 33.3% -2.22 0–1 1–0 — +0.68
21 1988 2102 162.5 — — — — +47 -48 — 73.1% +1.85 5–7 (42%) 6–4 (60%) 96.3 -1.56 1978 1627 116.6 — — — — +12 -76 — 40.4% -0.75 8–2 (80%) 2–1 (67%) 109.3 +0.30
22 1989 2019 154.6 — — — — +29 +17 — 69.0% +1.48 5–3 (63%) 3–2 (60%) 98.1 +1.23 1979 1633 122.5 — — — — -19 -10 — 40.9% -1.45 1–3 (25%) 5–0 (100%) 101.8 -0.21
23 1990 2069 173.2 — — — — +56 -42 — 68.5% +1.77 9–7 (56%) 3–1 (75%) 103.3 -2.84 1980 1657 127.1 — — — — — -77 — 64.9% +1.30 6–4 (60%) 1–4 (20%) 97.7 +0.61
24 1991 2028 159.2 — — — — +51 +26 — 72.7% +1.77 7–4 (64%) 5–5 (50%) 99.7 +1.33 1981 1740 134.1 — — — — -99 -51 — 63.3% +1.20 7–7 (50%) 6–9 (40%) 96.3 +2.33
25 1992 1999 152.0 — — — — +87 +17 -91 67.0% +1.41 10–3 (77%) 2–4 (33%) 101.2 +2.30 1982 1780 140.9 — — — — -182 +94 — 56.6% +0.45 6–11 (35%) 7–3 (70%) 98.9 -1.80
26 1993 2046 159.7 — — — — +80 -115 — 65.8% +1.04 8–7 (53%) 4–2 (67%) 99.2 -0.01 1983 1578 104.1 — — — — -85 +204 — 24.0% -1.80 2–4 (33%) 1–3 (25%) 94.8 +0.41
27 1994 2068 143.1 — — — — +47 — — 77.4% +2.36 3–0 (100%) 0–2 — +0.52 1984 1589 120.4 — — — — -106 +162 — 48.3% -0.34 0–6 (0%) 5–3 (63%) 95.2 +0.35
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 1543 114.5 — — — — -89 +100 — 39.1% -0.22 0–2 1–3 (25%) — +0.79
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 1562 123.2 — — — — -78 +112 — 49.2% +0.11 5–8 (38%) 5–2 (71%) 99.4 +0.75
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 1551 107.8 — — — — -104 +50 — 39.1% -0.48 2–6 (25%) 3–1 (75%) 97.0 +0.60
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 1473 104.6 — — — — -64 +64 — 31.4% -1.20 2–3 (40%) 1–1 — +1.45
Career — 2131 166.2 — — — — +15 -4 -134 68.1% +1.46 97–70 (58%) 48–41 (54%) 101.4 -1.19 — 1838 128.5 — — — — -84 +56 — 49.6% +0.05 39–57 (41%) 38–30 (56%) 96.2 +2.24

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.