H2H data updated: 2026-09-08 00:00 UTC

Marcella Mesker vs Amy Holton H2H: 0-1

Amy Holton holds a 1–0 lead over Marcella Mesker in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Amy Holton leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Amy Holton won the 1985 Barcelona round of 32 4-6 6-3 7-5.

H2H
0 1
1 main-draw meetings

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Amy Holton 4-6 6-3 7-5 Marcella Mesker Match data May 9, 1985* R32 Barcelona WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Marcella Mesker #394 #31 22 1,791 103 134 43.5% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Amy Holton #300 #162 3 1,578 27 62 30.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Marcella Mesker Amy Holton
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1980 0–1 0.0% 1,484 0 0
17 1982 0–1 0.0% 1,475 0 0
18 1983 10–17 37.0% 1,507 0 0
19 1984 6–13 31.6% 1,493 0 0
20 1979 6–10 37.5% 1,499 0 0 1985 9–16 36.0% 1,553 0 0
21 1980 6–13 31.6% 1,493 0 0 1986 2–13 13.3% #179 1,464 0 0
22 1981 7–9 43.8% 1,559 0 0 1987 0–1 0.0% #300 1,456 0 0
23 1982 14–14 50.0% 1,682 0 0
24 1983 16–19 45.7% 1,708 0 0
25 1984 21–22 48.8% #37 1,740 0 0
26 1985 11–20 35.5% #38 1,659 0 0
27 1986 16–11 59.3% #31 1,760 0 1
28 1987 5–12 29.4% #148 1,623 0 1
29 1988 1–4 20.0% #369 1,562 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Marcella Mesker Amy Holton
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1980 0 1 1 0.0%
17 1982 0 1 1 0.0%
18 1983 1 5 6 16.7% 5 6 11 45.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
19 1984 2 5 7 28.6% 3 7 10 30.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
20 1979 0 1 1 0.0% 5 7 12 41.7% 1985 5 8 13 38.5% 4 7 11 36.4% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1980 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 1 3 4 25.0% 1986 0 5 5 0.0% 2 8 10 20.0%
22 1981 2 1 3 66.7% 4 2 6 66.7% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 1987 0 1 1 0.0%
23 1982 1 1 2 50.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 7 6 13 53.8% 0 3 3 0.0%
24 1983 4 3 7 57.1% 6 6 12 50.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 3 5 8 37.5%
25 1984 1 7 8 12.5% 7 5 12 58.3% 6 5 11 54.5% 7 5 12 58.3%
26 1985 5 7 12 41.7% 0 3 3 0.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 1 4 5 20.0%
27 1986 1 1 2 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 8 4 12 66.7%
28 1987 3 4 7 42.9% 1 6 7 14.3% 1 2 3 33.3%
29 1988 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
Career 18 28 46 39.1% 28 35 63 44.4% 36 44 80 45.0% 20 25 45 44.4% 8 25 33 24.2% 14 29 43 32.6% 1 4 5 20.0% 3 3 6 50.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Marcella Mesker Amy Holton
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1980 1484 98.2 33.3% -1.33 0–1 +0.11
17 1982 1476 99.5 33.3% -2.00 0–1 +0.04
18 1983 1508 107.0 +12 +99 39.3% -0.93 5–4 (56%) 2–2 (50%) 102.8 +1.83
19 1984 1493 112.4 -10 +69 36.4% -0.70 2–4 (33%) 2–1 (67%) 99.2 +1.44
20 1979 1500 112.9 +53 35.5% -1.03 0–3 (0%) 2–0 +0.78 1985 1554 108.9 -21 -25 37.7% -1.28 6–5 (55%) 3–1 (75%) 104.9 +0.27
21 1980 1493 111.8 +46 +51 36.6% -1.05 0–3 (0%) 3–1 (75%) 97.5 +0.88 1986 1465 93.6 +10 +9 15.6% -2.63 1–1 0–2 +0.33
22 1981 1559 120.4 +54 +11 -28 50.0% +0.22 2–4 (33%) 2–1 (67%) 100.7 +1.20 1987 1457 99.2 0.0% -3.00 -0.09
23 1982 1683 137.2 -141 -24 -8 51.6% +0.34 5–5 (50%) 2–7 (22%) 99.1 -1.02
24 1983 1708 136.1 -78 -2 -51 48.1% -0.10 2–5 (29%) 4–3 (57%) 98.5 -2.87
25 1984 1741 130.9 -105 +23 -30 46.7% -0.38 12–7 (63%) 9–5 (64%) 110.6 +0.43
26 1985 1660 121.1 -18 +5 +17 39.2% -0.95 5–7 (42%) 2–4 (33%) 97.7 -0.95
27 1986 1761 129.1 -42 -66 -55 58.7% +0.24 6–5 (55%) 4–1 (80%) 104.6 +0.73
28 1987 1623 99.7 +66 -58 +49 33.3% -1.08 0–4 (0%) 2–3 (40%) 92.6 +0.52
29 1988 1563 97.9 -35 27.3% -1.27 0–1 2–1 (67%) +0.52
Career 1792 130.6 -42 -14 0 45.4% -0.37 32–44 (42%) 32–26 (55%) 102.2 +0.09 1579 106.8 -4 +38 34.0% -1.29 14–16 (47%) 7–6 (54%) 102.2 +4.42

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.