H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Marcella Mesker vs Annabel Croft H2H: 1-1
Marcella Mesker and Annabel Croft are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Marcella Mesker leads 1–0 on clay, while Annabel Croft leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Marcella Mesker won the 1986 Marco Island third round 6-0 7-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 3, 1986* | Marco Island | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Marcella Mesker | 6-0 7-6 | Annabel Croft | Match data |
| Jun 20, 1984* | Eastbourne | WTA 250 | R64 | Grass | Annabel Croft | 7-6 6-2 | Marcella Mesker | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marcella Mesker | #394 | #31 | 22 | 1,791 | 103 | 134 | 43.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Annabel Croft | — | — | — | 1,781 | 84 | 92 | 47.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Marcella Mesker | Annabel Croft | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,480 | 0 | 0 |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 9–5 | 64.3% | — | 1,549 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 14–9 | 60.9% | — | 1,595 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 6–7 | 46.2% | — | 1,599 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 11–14 | 44.0% | — | 1,617 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 23–20 | 53.5% | — | 1,762 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 10–19 | 34.5% | — | 1,653 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1979 | 6–10 | 37.5% | — | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 8–14 | 36.4% | — | 1,574 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1980 | 6–13 | 31.6% | — | 1,498 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 3–3 | 50.0% | — | 1,561 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1981 | 7–9 | 43.8% | — | 1,553 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1982 | 14–14 | 50.0% | — | 1,680 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1983 | 16–19 | 45.7% | — | 1,707 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1984 | 21–22 | 48.8% | #37 | 1,740 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1985 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #38 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1986 | 16–11 | 59.3% | #31 | 1,760 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1987 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #148 | 1,623 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1988 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #369 | 1,562 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |