H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Marcella Mesker vs Iva Budarova H2H: 0-2
Iva Budarova holds a 2–0 lead over Marcella Mesker in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Iva Budarova leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Iva Budarova won the 1984 Wimbledon first round 7-6 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 27, 1984* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Iva Budarova | 7-6 6-2 | Marcella Mesker | Match data |
| Oct 21, 1982* | Filderstadt | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Iva Budarova | 7-6 3-6 7-5 | Marcella Mesker | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marcella Mesker | #394 | #31 | 22 | 1,791 | 103 | 134 | 43.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Iva Budarova | #661 | #25 | 9 | 1,859 | 148 | 206 | 41.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Marcella Mesker | Iva Budarova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,510 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 4–6 | 40.0% | — | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 15–13 | 53.6% | — | 1,655 | 0 | 3 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 3–8 | 27.3% | — | 1,606 | 0 | 3 |
| 20 | 1979 | 6–10 | 37.5% | — | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 2–14 | 12.5% | — | 1,544 | 0 | 3 |
| 21 | 1980 | 6–13 | 31.6% | — | 1,498 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 14–19 | 42.4% | — | 1,656 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 1981 | 7–9 | 43.8% | — | 1,553 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 33–23 | 58.9% | — | 1,734 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 1982 | 14–14 | 50.0% | — | 1,680 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #56 | 1,705 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 1983 | 16–19 | 45.7% | — | 1,707 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 19–23 | 45.2% | #68 | 1,727 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 1984 | 21–22 | 48.8% | #37 | 1,740 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 11–24 | 31.4% | #112 | 1,587 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 1985 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #38 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #116 | 1,563 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 1986 | 16–11 | 59.3% | #31 | 1,760 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #105 | 1,586 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 1987 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #148 | 1,623 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #141 | 1,560 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 1988 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #369 | 1,562 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #186 | 1,534 | 0 | 3 |