H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Marcella Mesker vs Leigh Anne Thompson H2H: 2-1
Marcella Mesker holds a 2–1 lead over Leigh Anne Thompson in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Marcella Mesker leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Marcella Mesker won the 1986 Oklahoma fourth round 3-6 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 28, 1986* | Oklahoma | WTA 250 | R16 | Carpet | Marcella Mesker | 3-6 6-4 6-2 | Leigh Anne Thompson | Match data |
| Aug 15, 1985* | Mahwah | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Leigh Anne Thompson | 6-1 6-1 | Marcella Mesker | Match data |
| Nov 7, 1981* | Hong Kong | WTA 250 | QF | Clay | Marcella Mesker | 6-4 6-1 | Leigh Anne Thompson | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marcella Mesker | #394 | #31 | 22 | 1,791 | 103 | 134 | 43.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Leigh Anne Thompson | — | — | — | 1,793 | 42 | 73 | 36.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Marcella Mesker | Leigh Anne Thompson | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 4–5 | 44.4% | — | 1,542 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 20–23 | 46.5% | — | 1,766 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 7–17 | 29.2% | — | 1,705 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1979 | 6–10 | 37.5% | — | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 0–8 | 0.0% | — | 1,582 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1980 | 6–13 | 31.6% | — | 1,498 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 6–11 | 35.3% | — | 1,590 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1981 | 7–9 | 43.8% | — | 1,553 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 5–9 | 35.7% | — | 1,553 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1982 | 14–14 | 50.0% | — | 1,680 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1983 | 16–19 | 45.7% | — | 1,707 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1984 | 21–22 | 48.8% | #37 | 1,740 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1985 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #38 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1986 | 16–11 | 59.3% | #31 | 1,760 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1987 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #148 | 1,623 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1988 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #369 | 1,562 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |