H2H data updated: 2026-10-27 00:00 UTC

Marcella Mesker vs Mima Jausovec H2H: 1-1

Marcella Mesker and Mima Jausovec are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Marcella Mesker leads 1–0 on carpet, while Mima Jausovec leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Marcella Mesker won the 1984 Chicago round of 32 7-6 2-6 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Marcella Mesker
NED Age 67
H2H
1 – 1
2 main-draw meetings
Mima Jausovec
SLO Age 70 Right-Handed 160 cm / 5'3"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Marcella Mesker #53 7-6 2-6 6-2 Mima Jausovec #28 Match data Feb 9, 1984* R32 Chicago WTA 250 Carpet
Mima Jausovec 6-0 6-2 Marcella Mesker Match data Aug 28, 1980* R128 US Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Marcella Mesker — #31 22 1,792 103 134 43.5% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Mima Jausovec — #23 2 2,092 339 246 57.9% 1 0 0 1 5 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Marcella Mesker Mima Jausovec
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1972 2–0 100.0% — 1,533 0 1
16 — — — — — — — 1973 2–1 66.7% — 1,560 0 1
17 — — — — — — — 1974 18–13 58.1% — 1,793 0 1
18 — — — — — — — 1975 16–19 45.7% — 1,833 0 1
19 — — — — — — — 1976 33–16 67.3% — 2,006 0 4
20 1979 6–10 37.5% — 1,500 0 0 1977 32–21 60.4% — 2,010 1 5
21 1980 6–13 31.6% — 1,492 0 0 1978 29–19 60.4% — 1,947 1 6
22 1981 7–9 43.8% — 1,558 0 0 1979 32–28 53.3% — 1,872 1 6
23 1982 14–14 50.0% — 1,683 0 0 1980 34–22 60.7% — 1,947 1 6
24 1983 16–19 45.7% — 1,708 0 0 1981 57–28 67.1% — 2,015 1 6
25 1984 21–22 48.8% #37 1,741 0 0 1982 36–24 60.0% — 1,859 1 7
26 1985 11–20 35.5% — 1,660 0 0 1983 23–16 59.0% — 1,874 1 7
27 1986 16–11 59.3% #31 1,761 0 1 1984 12–17 41.4% #87 1,748 1 7
28 1987 5–12 29.4% #148 1,623 0 1 1985 9–12 42.9% — 1,695 1 7
29 1988 1–4 20.0% #369 1,563 0 1 1986 2–4 33.3% #184 1,673 1 7
30 — — — — — — — 1987 1–3 25.0% #233 1,656 1 7
31 — — — — — — — 1988 1–3 25.0% #362 1,641 1 7

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Marcella Mesker Mima Jausovec
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1972 — — — — 2 0 2 100.0% — — — — — — — —
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1973 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1974 0 2 2 0.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 6 3 9 66.7% 5 4 9 55.6%
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1975 2 3 5 40.0% 9 5 14 64.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 9 11 18.2%
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1976 0 2 2 0.0% 21 3 24 87.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 9 9 18 50.0%
20 1979 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 5 7 12 41.7% — — — — 1977 1 2 3 33.3% 20 6 26 76.9% 1 2 3 33.3% 10 11 21 47.6%
21 1980 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 1 3 4 25.0% 1978 2 3 5 40.0% 13 4 17 76.5% 7 3 10 70.0% 7 9 16 43.8%
22 1981 2 1 3 66.7% 4 2 6 66.7% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 1979 6 7 13 46.2% 9 6 15 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 16 13 29 55.2%
23 1982 1 1 2 50.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 7 6 13 53.8% 0 3 3 0.0% 1980 8 3 11 72.7% 4 3 7 57.1% 6 3 9 66.7% 16 13 29 55.2%
24 1983 4 3 7 57.1% 6 6 12 50.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 3 5 8 37.5% 1981 4 3 7 57.1% 15 6 21 71.4% 10 5 15 66.7% 28 14 42 66.7%
25 1984 1 7 8 12.5% 7 5 12 58.3% 6 5 11 54.5% 7 5 12 58.3% 1982 2 4 6 33.3% 9 5 14 64.3% 2 5 7 28.6% 23 10 33 69.7%
26 1985 5 7 12 41.7% 0 3 3 0.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 1 4 5 20.0% 1983 6 4 10 60.0% 13 6 19 68.4% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 4 5 20.0%
27 1986 1 1 2 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 8 4 12 66.7% 1984 2 3 5 40.0% 10 7 17 58.8% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 5 5 0.0%
28 1987 3 4 7 42.9% 1 6 7 14.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1985 2 5 7 28.6% 7 5 12 58.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
29 1988 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — 1986 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
Career — 18 28 46 39.1% 28 35 63 44.4% 36 44 80 45.0% 20 25 45 44.4% — 35 43 78 44.9% 145 67 212 68.4% 42 33 75 56.0% 117 103 220 53.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Marcella Mesker Mima Jausovec
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1972 1533 109.9 — — — — — — — 100.0% +3.75 — — — +0.55
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1973 1561 114.8 — — — — — +38 — 57.1% +1.57 1–0 — — +0.17
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1974 1794 144.8 — — — — -138 -70 -107 55.2% +0.37 4–3 (57%) 4–5 (44%) 102.8 -2.15
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1975 1833 146.7 — — — — -145 +20 -114 48.1% -0.05 7–6 (54%) 2–2 (50%) 101.7 -2.20
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1976 2006 156.7 — — — — -269 +59 -235 61.6% +1.23 11–5 (69%) 4–6 (40%) 104.5 -4.08
20 1979 1500 112.9 — — — — — — +53 35.5% -1.03 0–3 (0%) 2–0 — +0.76 1977 2011 161.8 — — — — -204 +129 -274 61.5% +0.98 5–10 (33%) 7–4 (64%) 95.6 -5.46
21 1980 1492 111.8 — — — — +48 — +52 36.6% -1.05 0–3 (0%) 3–1 (75%) 97.5 +0.90 1978 1947 147.6 — — — — -139 +160 -130 58.9% +0.51 10–5 (67%) 3–5 (38%) 100.1 -4.09
22 1981 1559 120.5 — — — — +54 +11 -28 50.0% +0.22 2–4 (33%) 2–1 (67%) 100.7 +1.12 1979 1873 146.6 — — — — -11 +165 -111 54.4% +0.40 6–10 (38%) 5–5 (50%) 95.9 +0.01
23 1982 1683 137.3 — — — — -141 -24 -8 51.6% +0.34 5–5 (50%) 2–7 (22%) 99.1 -1.00 1980 1947 156.3 — — — — +4 +49 -112 58.7% +0.84 6–3 (67%) 3–9 (25%) 100.1 -3.84
24 1983 1709 136.3 — — — — -78 -2 -51 48.1% -0.10 2–5 (29%) 4–3 (57%) 98.5 -2.88 1981 2015 157.3 — — — — -1 +4 -104 63.1% +1.07 16–11 (59%) 11–4 (73%) 104.3 -2.23
25 1984 1741 131.1 — — — — -104 +24 -30 46.7% -0.38 12–7 (63%) 9–5 (64%) 110.6 +0.47 1982 1859 148.8 — — — — +114 +111 -67 59.3% +0.50 9–13 (41%) 9–3 (75%) 95.9 +1.20
26 1985 1660 121.2 — — — — -17 +6 +18 39.2% -0.95 5–7 (42%) 2–4 (33%) 97.7 -0.96 1983 1875 144.0 — — — — -17 +151 -63 58.4% +0.64 5–6 (45%) 2–5 (29%) 94.5 -2.60
27 1986 1761 129.2 — — — — -42 -66 -55 58.7% +0.24 6–5 (55%) 4–1 (80%) 104.6 +0.46 1984 1748 131.8 — — — — -26 +199 — 46.8% -0.18 1–5 (17%) 2–5 (29%) 88.9 -1.24
28 1987 1624 99.7 — — — — +65 -59 +48 33.3% -1.08 0–4 (0%) 2–3 (40%) 92.6 +0.55 1985 1696 127.7 — — — — -21 +205 — 45.8% -0.33 2–4 (33%) 2–2 (50%) 94.8 -0.55
29 1988 1563 97.9 — — — — — -35 — 27.3% -1.27 0–1 2–1 (67%) — +0.52 1986 1674 105.7 — — — — — +196 — 40.0% -1.80 1–2 (33%) 1–0 — -0.21
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 1657 107.2 — — — — — +178 — 40.0% -1.60 0–2 — — -0.39
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 1642 110.1 — — — — — +161 — 25.0% -2.75 — — — -0.77
Career — 1792 130.7 — — — — -42 -14 +1 45.4% -0.37 32–44 (42%) 32–26 (55%) 102.2 -0.03 — 2093 156.2 — — — — -46 +105 -120 57.2% +0.57 84–85 (50%) 55–55 (50%) 94.6 -4.80

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.