H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Marcie Louie vs Raquel Giscafre H2H: 1-0
Marcie Louie holds a 1–0 lead over Raquel Giscafre in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Marcie Louie leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Marcie Louie won the 1975 Chicago third round 2-6 6- 2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 13, 1975* | Chicago | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Marcie Louie | 2-6 6- 2 6-3 | Raquel Giscafre | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marcie Louie | — | — | — | 1,867 | 103 | 141 | 42.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Raquel Giscafre | — | — | — | 1,797 | 86 | 120 | 41.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Marcie Louie | Raquel Giscafre | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | 1968 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 1969 | 4–1 | 80.0% | — | 1,545 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1970 | 3–3 | 50.0% | — | 1,565 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1971 | 4–3 | 57.1% | — | 1,594 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1972 | 19–20 | 48.7% | — | 1,696 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1973 | 7–20 | 25.9% | — | 1,637 | 0 | 3 | 1968 | 5–8 | 38.5% | — | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1974 | 11–17 | 39.3% | — | 1,687 | 0 | 3 | 1969 | 9–15 | 37.5% | — | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1975 | 16–15 | 51.6% | — | 1,784 | 0 | 4 | 1970 | 3–2 | 60.0% | — | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1976 | 13–16 | 44.8% | — | 1,783 | 0 | 4 | 1971 | 5–13 | 27.8% | — | 1,471 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1977 | 11–22 | 33.3% | — | 1,646 | 0 | 4 | 1972 | 6–16 | 27.3% | — | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1978 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,599 | 0 | 4 | 1973 | 11–11 | 50.0% | — | 1,607 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1979 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,607 | 0 | 4 | 1974 | 26–17 | 60.5% | — | 1,744 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 1980 | 10–10 | 50.0% | — | 1,609 | 0 | 4 | 1975 | 15–18 | 45.5% | — | 1,727 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | 1981 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,609 | 0 | 4 | 1976 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,710 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | 1982 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,576 | 0 | 4 | 1977 | 2–6 | 25.0% | — | 1,658 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 1–8 | 11.1% | — | 1,560 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,566 | 0 | 4 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,540 | 0 | 4 |