H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Marcie Louie vs Sue Stap H2H: 2-1
Marcie Louie holds a 2–1 lead over Sue Stap in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Marcie Louie leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Marcie Louie won the 1976 Houston third round 7-6(2) 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 15, 1976* | Houston | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Marcie Louie | 7-6(2) 6-2 | Sue Stap | Match data |
| Jan 10, 1975* | San Francisco | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Sue Stap | 6-2 6-0 | Marcie Louie | Match data |
| Jun 1, 1971* | Tulsa | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Marcie Louie | 6-2 6-4 | Sue Stap | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marcie Louie | — | — | — | 1,867 | 103 | 141 | 42.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Sue Stap | — | — | — | 1,722 | 42 | 78 | 35.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Marcie Louie | Sue Stap | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | 1968 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 1969 | 4–1 | 80.0% | — | 1,545 | 0 | 1 | 1969 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 1970 | 3–3 | 50.0% | — | 1,565 | 0 | 2 | 1970 | 5–6 | 45.5% | — | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1971 | 4–3 | 57.1% | — | 1,594 | 0 | 3 | 1971 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1972 | 19–20 | 48.7% | — | 1,696 | 0 | 3 | 1972 | 7–5 | 58.3% | — | 1,584 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1973 | 7–20 | 25.9% | — | 1,637 | 0 | 3 | 1973 | 12–17 | 41.4% | — | 1,591 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1974 | 11–17 | 39.3% | — | 1,687 | 0 | 3 | 1974 | 8–14 | 36.4% | — | 1,613 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1975 | 16–15 | 51.6% | — | 1,784 | 0 | 4 | 1975 | 8–13 | 38.1% | — | 1,681 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1976 | 13–16 | 44.8% | — | 1,783 | 0 | 4 | 1976 | 0–12 | 0.0% | — | 1,534 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1977 | 11–22 | 33.3% | — | 1,646 | 0 | 4 | 1977 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,521 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1978 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,599 | 0 | 4 | 1978 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,488 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1979 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,607 | 0 | 4 | 1979 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,483 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1980 | 10–10 | 50.0% | — | 1,609 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1981 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,609 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1982 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,576 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |