H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Margaret Court vs Almut Sturm H2H: 3-0
Margaret Court holds a 3–0 lead over Almut Sturm in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Margaret Court leads 2–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Margaret Court won the 1970 Hilversum fourth round 6-2 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 84
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
3
–
0
3 main draw meetings
Age 85
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 31, 1970* | Hilversum | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Margaret Court | 6-2 6-2 | Almut Sturm | Match data |
| Mar 23, 1969* | Pompano Beach | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Margaret Court | (w/o) | Almut Sturm | Match data |
| Mar 2, 1969* | Curacao | WTA 250 | QF | Hard | Margaret Court | 6-3 6-1 | Almut Sturm | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Margaret Court | — | — | — | 2,487 | 616 | 64 | 90.6% | 11 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 78 | 95 |
| Almut Sturm | — | — | — | 1,635 | 45 | 63 | 41.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Margaret Court | Almut Sturm | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 25 | 1968 | 103–12 | 89.6% | — | 2,042 | 0 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1969 | 103–6 | 94.5% | — | 2,236 | 3 | 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1970 | 114–6 | 95.0% | — | 2,350 | 7 | 56 | 1968 | 16–12 | 57.1% | — | 1,613 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 1971 | 59–4 | 93.7% | — | 2,374 | 8 | 65 | 1969 | 12–16 | 42.9% | — | 1,587 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 1972 | 57–6 | 90.5% | — | 2,400 | 8 | 74 | 1970 | 5–10 | 33.3% | — | 1,547 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 1973 | 105–7 | 93.8% | — | 2,432 | 11 | 92 | 1971 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,510 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | 1974 | 12–2 | 85.7% | — | 2,409 | 11 | 93 | 1972 | 4–5 | 44.4% | — | 1,530 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | 1975 | 40–13 | 75.5% | — | 2,250 | 11 | 94 | 1973 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,510 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | 1976 | 7–1 | 87.5% | — | 2,262 | 11 | 95 | 1974 | 3–4 | 42.9% | — | 1,524 | 0 | 2 |
| 34 | 1977 | 16–7 | 69.6% | — | 2,200 | 11 | 95 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,506 | 0 | 2 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,490 | 0 | 2 |
| 39 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 3–4 | 42.9% | — | 1,495 | 0 | 2 |
| 40 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,468 | 0 | 2 |