H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Margaret Court vs Cynthia Doerner H2H: 2-0
Margaret Court holds a 2–0 lead over Cynthia Doerner in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Margaret Court leads 2–0 on grass. Most recently, Margaret Court won the 1973 Newport third round 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 84
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
Age 75
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 23, 1973* | Newport | WTA 250 | R32 | Grass | Margaret Court | 6-3 6-4 | Cynthia Doerner | Match data |
| Jan 25, 1968* | Australian Championships | Grand Slam | R32 | Grass | Margaret Court | 6-3 6-2 | Cynthia Doerner | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Margaret Court | — | — | — | 2,487 | 616 | 64 | 90.6% | 11 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 78 | 95 |
| Cynthia Doerner | — | — | — | 1,893 | 152 | 162 | 48.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Margaret Court | Cynthia Doerner | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1968 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | 1,471 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 0–5 | 0.0% | — | 1,428 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,456 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1971 | 3–8 | 27.3% | — | 1,415 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1972 | 21–20 | 51.2% | — | 1,624 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 7–13 | 35.0% | — | 1,609 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1974 | 4–5 | 44.4% | — | 1,625 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1975 | 44–23 | 65.7% | — | 1,852 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 1968 | 103–12 | 89.6% | — | 2,042 | 0 | 15 | 1976 | 18–26 | 40.9% | — | 1,713 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 1969 | 103–6 | 94.5% | — | 2,236 | 3 | 34 | 1977 | 15–19 | 44.1% | — | 1,742 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | 1970 | 114–6 | 95.0% | — | 2,350 | 7 | 56 | 1978 | 11–18 | 37.9% | — | 1,621 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | 1971 | 59–4 | 93.7% | — | 2,374 | 8 | 65 | 1979 | 14–12 | 53.8% | — | 1,649 | 0 | 5 |
| 29 | 1972 | 57–6 | 90.5% | — | 2,400 | 8 | 74 | 1980 | 12–7 | 63.2% | — | 1,662 | 0 | 5 |
| 30 | 1973 | 105–7 | 93.8% | — | 2,432 | 11 | 92 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1974 | 12–2 | 85.7% | — | 2,409 | 11 | 93 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1975 | 40–13 | 75.5% | — | 2,250 | 11 | 94 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1976 | 7–1 | 87.5% | — | 2,262 | 11 | 95 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 1977 | 16–7 | 69.6% | — | 2,200 | 11 | 95 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |