H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Margaret Court vs Janet Newberry H2H: 4-0
Margaret Court holds a 4–0 lead over Janet Newberry in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Margaret Court leads 2–0 on clay and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Margaret Court won the 1975 US Open fourth round 7-5 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 84
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
4
–
0
4 main draw meetings
USA
Age 72
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 4, 1975* | US Open | Grand Slam | R16 | Clay | Margaret Court | 7-5 6-3 | Janet Newberry | Match data |
| Mar 20, 1973* | Richmond | WTA 250 | F | Clay | Margaret Court | 6-2 6-1 | Janet Newberry | Match data |
| Feb 3, 1973* | Bethesda | WTA 250 | SF | Carpet | Margaret Court | 6-1 6-4 | Janet Newberry | Match data |
| Aug 14, 1969* | Haverford | WTA 250 | R32 | Grass | Margaret Court | 6-2 6-2 | Janet Newberry | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Margaret Court | — | — | — | 2,487 | 616 | 64 | 90.6% | 11 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 78 | 95 |
| Janet Newberry | — | — | — | 1,919 | 238 | 187 | 56.0% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 8 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Margaret Court | Janet Newberry | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1968 | 7–5 | 58.3% | — | 1,541 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 13–6 | 68.4% | — | 1,645 | 0 | 2 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 20–7 | 74.1% | — | 1,726 | 0 | 5 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1971 | 15–9 | 62.5% | — | 1,765 | 0 | 5 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1972 | 20–17 | 54.1% | — | 1,707 | 0 | 5 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 32–24 | 57.1% | — | 1,851 | 0 | 5 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1974 | 22–22 | 50.0% | — | 1,810 | 0 | 5 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1975 | 31–22 | 58.5% | — | 1,899 | 0 | 6 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 14–10 | 58.3% | — | 1,859 | 0 | 6 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 25–22 | 53.2% | — | 1,873 | 0 | 7 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 15–14 | 51.7% | — | 1,831 | 0 | 7 |
| 25 | 1968 | 103–12 | 89.6% | — | 2,042 | 0 | 15 | 1979 | 12–21 | 36.4% | — | 1,679 | 0 | 7 |
| 26 | 1969 | 103–6 | 94.5% | — | 2,236 | 3 | 34 | 1980 | 12–8 | 60.0% | — | 1,631 | 0 | 8 |
| 27 | 1970 | 114–6 | 95.0% | — | 2,350 | 7 | 56 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1971 | 59–4 | 93.7% | — | 2,374 | 8 | 65 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1972 | 57–6 | 90.5% | — | 2,400 | 8 | 74 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1973 | 105–7 | 93.8% | — | 2,432 | 11 | 92 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1974 | 12–2 | 85.7% | — | 2,409 | 11 | 93 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1975 | 40–13 | 75.5% | — | 2,250 | 11 | 94 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1976 | 7–1 | 87.5% | — | 2,262 | 11 | 95 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 1977 | 16–7 | 69.6% | — | 2,200 | 11 | 95 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |