H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Margaret Court vs Raquel Giscafre H2H: 1-0
Margaret Court holds a 1–0 lead over Raquel Giscafre in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Margaret Court leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Margaret Court won the 1975 Detroit quarterfinal 6-0 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 84
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
ARG
Age 77
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 23, 1975* | Detroit | WTA 250 | QF | Carpet | Margaret Court | 6-0 6-2 | Raquel Giscafre | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Margaret Court | — | — | — | 2,487 | 616 | 64 | 90.6% | 11 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 78 | 95 |
| Raquel Giscafre | — | — | — | 1,797 | 86 | 120 | 41.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Margaret Court | Raquel Giscafre | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1968 | 5–8 | 38.5% | — | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 9–15 | 37.5% | — | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 3–2 | 60.0% | — | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1971 | 5–13 | 27.8% | — | 1,471 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1972 | 6–16 | 27.3% | — | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 11–11 | 50.0% | — | 1,607 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1968 | 103–12 | 89.6% | — | 2,042 | 0 | 15 | 1974 | 26–17 | 60.5% | — | 1,744 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 1969 | 103–6 | 94.5% | — | 2,236 | 3 | 34 | 1975 | 15–18 | 45.5% | — | 1,727 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | 1970 | 114–6 | 95.0% | — | 2,350 | 7 | 56 | 1976 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,710 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | 1971 | 59–4 | 93.7% | — | 2,374 | 8 | 65 | 1977 | 2–6 | 25.0% | — | 1,658 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | 1972 | 57–6 | 90.5% | — | 2,400 | 8 | 74 | 1978 | 1–8 | 11.1% | — | 1,560 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | 1973 | 105–7 | 93.8% | — | 2,432 | 11 | 92 | 1979 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,566 | 0 | 4 |
| 31 | 1974 | 12–2 | 85.7% | — | 2,409 | 11 | 93 | 1980 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,540 | 0 | 4 |
| 32 | 1975 | 40–13 | 75.5% | — | 2,250 | 11 | 94 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1976 | 7–1 | 87.5% | — | 2,262 | 11 | 95 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 1977 | 16–7 | 69.6% | — | 2,200 | 11 | 95 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |