H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Margarita Gasparyan vs Bojana Jovanovski Petrovic H2H: 1-0
Margarita Gasparyan holds a 1–0 lead over Bojana Jovanovski Petrovic in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Margarita Gasparyan leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Margarita Gasparyan won the 2016 St. Petersburg third round 6-1 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 31
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
SRB
Age 34
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 11, 2016* | St. Petersburg | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Margarita Gasparyan | 6-1 6-2 | Bojana Jovanovski Petrovic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Margarita Gasparyan | #1,358 | #41 | 1,213 | 1,773 | 50 | 57 | 46.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Bojana Jovanovski Petrovic | #546 | #32 | 1,485 | 1,737 | 97 | 125 | 43.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Margarita Gasparyan | Bojana Jovanovski Petrovic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #214 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #80 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2014 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #220 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 14–26 | 35.0% | #73 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2015 | 10–6 | 62.5% | #61 | 1,617 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #56 | 1,618 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2016 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #117 | 1,602 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #36 | 1,728 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 20–26 | 43.5% | #57 | 1,615 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2018 | 11–5 | 68.8% | #92 | 1,755 | 0 | 2 | 2015 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #79 | 1,622 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2019 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #104 | 1,685 | 0 | 2 | 2016 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #725 | 1,558 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2020 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #125 | 1,606 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2021 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #164 | 1,606 | 0 | 2 | 2018 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #546 | 1,518 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2023 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,528 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2024 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1358 | 1,465 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |