H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 04:30 UTC
Margarita Gasparyan vs Danka Kovinic H2H: 0-1
Danka Kovinic holds a 1–0 lead over Margarita Gasparyan in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Danka Kovinic leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Danka Kovinic won the 2019 Tashkent fourth round 7-5 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 31
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
MNE
Age 31
Right-Handed
169 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 27, 2019* | Tashkent | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Danka Kovinic | 7-5 6-4 | Margarita Gasparyan | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Margarita Gasparyan | #1,358 | #41 | 1,213 | 1,773 | 50 | 57 | 46.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Danka Kovinic | #1,327 | #46 | 1,312 | 1,755 | 85 | 121 | 41.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Margarita Gasparyan | Danka Kovinic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #214 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #168 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2014 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #220 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #109 | 1,460 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2015 | 10–6 | 62.5% | #61 | 1,617 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #57 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2016 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #117 | 1,602 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #71 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 3–16 | 15.8% | #121 | 1,454 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2018 | 11–5 | 68.8% | #92 | 1,755 | 0 | 2 | 2018 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #154 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2019 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #104 | 1,685 | 0 | 2 | 2019 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #85 | 1,567 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2020 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #125 | 1,606 | 0 | 2 | 2020 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #77 | 1,632 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2021 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #164 | 1,606 | 0 | 2 | 2021 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #96 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #60 | 1,687 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2023 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,528 | 0 | 2 | 2023 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #150 | 1,617 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2024 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1358 | 1,465 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1327 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 |