H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Margarita Gasparyan vs Johanna Larsson H2H: 1-1
Margarita Gasparyan and Johanna Larsson are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Margarita Gasparyan leads 1–0 on clay, while Johanna Larsson leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Margarita Gasparyan won the 2019 Istanbul third round 7-6(6) 4-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 31
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
SWE
Age 37
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 25, 2019* | Istanbul | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Margarita Gasparyan | 7-6(6) 4-6 6-3 | Johanna Larsson | Match data |
| Jan 14, 2016* | Hobart | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Johanna Larsson | 6-3 3-6 6-3 | Margarita Gasparyan | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Margarita Gasparyan | #1,358 | #41 | 1,213 | 1,773 | 50 | 57 | 46.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Johanna Larsson | #236 | #45 | 1,230 | 1,745 | 153 | 177 | 46.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Margarita Gasparyan | Johanna Larsson | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #214 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #389 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2014 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #220 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #177 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2015 | 10–6 | 62.5% | #61 | 1,617 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #172 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2016 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #117 | 1,602 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 9–9 | 50.0% | #69 | 1,571 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #59 | 1,669 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2018 | 11–5 | 68.8% | #92 | 1,755 | 0 | 2 | 2012 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #73 | 1,627 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2019 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #104 | 1,685 | 0 | 2 | 2013 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #84 | 1,625 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2020 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #125 | 1,606 | 0 | 2 | 2014 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #70 | 1,597 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2021 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #164 | 1,606 | 0 | 2 | 2015 | 25–19 | 56.8% | #56 | 1,670 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 29–24 | 54.7% | #50 | 1,716 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2023 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,528 | 0 | 2 | 2017 | 15–21 | 41.7% | #80 | 1,626 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2024 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1358 | 1,465 | 0 | 2 | 2018 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #75 | 1,600 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 3–13 | 18.8% | #217 | 1,557 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #236 | 1,543 | 0 | 2 |