H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Margarita Gasparyan vs Mihaela Buzarnescu H2H: 1-0
Margarita Gasparyan holds a 1–0 lead over Mihaela Buzarnescu in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Margarita Gasparyan leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Margarita Gasparyan won the 2019 Istanbul fourth round 1-6 6-4 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 31
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
ROU
Age 38
Left-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 26, 2019* | Istanbul | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Margarita Gasparyan | 1-6 6-4 7-5 | Mihaela Buzarnescu | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Margarita Gasparyan | #1,358 | #41 | 1,213 | 1,773 | 50 | 57 | 46.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Mihaela Buzarnescu | #798 | #20 | 2,068 | 1,872 | 58 | 63 | 47.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Margarita Gasparyan | Mihaela Buzarnescu | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #214 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2014 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #220 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2015 | 10–6 | 62.5% | #61 | 1,617 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2016 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #117 | 1,602 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2018 | 11–5 | 68.8% | #92 | 1,755 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2019 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #104 | 1,685 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2020 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #125 | 1,606 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2021 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #164 | 1,606 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2023 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,528 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2024 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1358 | 1,465 | 0 | 2 | 2017 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #60 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 34–21 | 61.8% | #24 | 1,798 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 13–23 | 36.1% | #113 | 1,634 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #137 | 1,619 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #122 | 1,631 | 0 | 1 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #404 | 1,615 | 0 | 1 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,538 | 0 | 1 |