H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Maria Elena Camerin vs Daja Bedanova H2H: 1-0

Maria Elena Camerin holds a 1–0 lead over Daja Bedanova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Maria Elena Camerin leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Maria Elena Camerin won the 2003 US Open round of 128 6-4 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Maria Elena Camerin
ITA Age 44 Right-Handed 164 cm / 5'5"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Daja Bedanova
CZE Age 43 Right-Handed 171 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Maria Elena Camerin #92 6-4 6-0 Daja Bedanova #88 Match data Aug 27, 2003* R128 US Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Maria Elena Camerin #817 #41 774 1,667 98 148 39.8% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Daja Bedanova #998 #16 1,323 1,806 65 72 47.4% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Maria Elena Camerin Daja Bedanova
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1999 1–1 50.0% #295 1,522 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 2000 13–9 59.1% #53 1,698 0 1
18 — — — — — — — 2001 20–20 50.0% #28 1,772 0 1
19 2001 6–5 54.5% #112 1,546 0 0 2002 24–25 49.0% #37 1,718 0 1
20 2002 5–8 38.5% #123 1,524 0 0 2003 6–15 28.6% #155 1,597 0 1
21 2003 3–8 27.3% #100 1,494 0 0 — — — — — — —
22 2004 22–20 52.4% #43 1,663 0 0 2005 1–2 33.3% #295 1,600 0 1
23 2005 11–22 33.3% #99 1,564 0 0 — — — — — — —
24 2006 22–23 48.9% #50 1,610 0 0 — — — — — — —
25 2007 9–18 33.3% #100 1,546 0 0 — — — — — — —
26 2008 5–11 31.2% #104 1,512 0 0 — — — — — — —
27 2009 5–14 26.3% #114 1,475 0 0 — — — — — — —
28 2010 6–11 35.3% #111 1,495 0 0 — — — — — — —
29 2011 1–4 20.0% #177 1,491 0 0 — — — — — — —
30 2012 1–2 33.3% #168 1,499 0 0 — — — — — — —
31 2013 2–2 50.0% #192 1,519 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Maria Elena Camerin Daja Bedanova
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 — — — — — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 12 7 19 63.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 16 13 29 55.2% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 3 3 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
19 2001 0 1 1 0.0% 6 4 10 60.0% — — — — — — — — 2002 13 14 27 48.1% 2 4 6 33.3% 7 3 10 70.0% 2 4 6 33.3%
20 2002 3 2 5 60.0% 2 6 8 25.0% — — — — — — — — 2003 3 6 9 33.3% 2 5 7 28.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0%
21 2003 1 3 4 25.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2004 16 11 27 59.3% 5 6 11 45.5% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2005 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
23 2005 9 13 22 40.9% 1 5 6 16.7% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2006 16 13 29 55.2% 5 7 12 41.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2007 5 9 14 35.7% 4 7 11 36.4% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2008 3 4 7 42.9% 2 6 8 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2009 4 9 13 30.8% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2010 5 4 9 55.6% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2011 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2012 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2013 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 62 71 133 46.6% 32 56 88 36.4% 4 19 23 17.4% 0 2 2 0.0% — 45 41 86 52.3% 7 12 19 36.8% 8 9 17 47.1% 5 10 15 33.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Maria Elena Camerin Daja Bedanova
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 1522 117.6 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.50 — — — -0.06
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 1698 131.5 — — — — +23 — — 51.9% +0.15 8–2 (80%) 2–1 (67%) 110.6 +0.15
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 1772 151.8 — — — — +15 -200 -253 50.5% +0.27 9–8 (53%) 3–11 (21%) 96.7 -2.29
19 2001 1546 108.1 — — — — — +58 — 56.0% +0.12 1–2 (33%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.85 2002 1718 137.2 — — — — -23 -139 -7 49.1% -0.08 10–10 (50%) 6–6 (50%) 98.1 -0.10
20 2002 1525 104.8 — — — — +9 +20 — 35.7% -0.68 2–2 (50%) — — +0.88 2003 1597 114.3 -0.44 -1.19 0.806 45.7% +21 -39 +82 33.3% -1.21 2–4 (33%) 0–2 — -0.74
21 2003 1495 108.8 +1.20 -0.47 0.973 50.2% +30 -5 — 38.5% -0.62 0–4 (0%) 2–1 (67%) 95.3 +0.46 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2004 1663 123.4 -1.01 -0.43 0.934 48.6% +23 -138 -150 49.0% -0.09 9–3 (75%) 3–3 (50%) 107.2 -0.10 2005 1600 108.4 — — — — — — — 37.5% -1.50 1–1 1–0 — -0.49
23 2005 1564 109.3 -3.27 -1.94 0.669 41.3% +36 -101 -92 36.8% -0.65 4–6 (40%) 1–6 (14%) 94.3 +1.00 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2006 1611 121.4 -1.81 -0.26 0.940 49.0% +12 -112 -120 49.5% -0.03 5–6 (45%) 2–2 (50%) 99.2 +0.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2007 1547 119.6 -2.46 -0.09 0.897 47.4% +36 -41 — 39.1% -0.94 3–7 (30%) 4–3 (57%) 97.9 -0.88 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2008 1513 107.2 -3.15 -3.06 0.768 44.3% +74 -63 — 39.5% -0.95 1–5 (17%) 2–0 — -0.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2009 1476 106.2 -4.26 +0.53 0.887 47.3% +48 -10 -46 33.3% -0.96 2–5 (29%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2010 1496 96.3 -4.40 -1.63 0.794 44.8% +59 -78 — 34.1% -1.44 5–2 (71%) — — +0.60 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2011 1492 104.5 -2.78 -0.88 0.774 43.8% — -65 — 27.3% -2.27 0–1 — — -0.65 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2012 1500 108.0 -0.75 +0.30 0.931 48.5% — — — 33.3% -0.83 — 0–1 — -0.27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2013 1520 103.4 -0.44 -2.36 0.915 47.9% — -33 — 50.0% -0.30 1–1 1–1 — -0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1668 116.9 -2.74 -0.75 0.863 46.8% +31 -52 -105 41.9% -0.58 33–44 (43%) 18–20 (47%) 98.0 +0.68 — 1807 141.8 -0.44 -1.19 0.806 45.7% +4 -107 -36 47.3% -0.15 30–25 (55%) 12–20 (38%) 100.2 -2.60

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.