H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Maria Elena Camerin vs Emilie Loit H2H: 3-2

Maria Elena Camerin holds a 3–2 lead over Emilie Loit in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Maria Elena Camerin leads 2–1 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Maria Elena Camerin won the 2008 US Open first round 6-0 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Maria Elena Camerin
ITA Age 44 Right-Handed 164 cm / 5'5"
H2H
3 – 2
5 main draw meetings
Emilie Loit
FRA Age 47 Left-Handed 167 cm / 5'6"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 27, 2008* US Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Maria Elena Camerin #133 6-0 6-2 Emilie Loit #120 Match data
Aug 25, 2006* Forest Hills WTA 250 R16 Hard Maria Elena Camerin #54 6-1 6-3 Emilie Loit #67 Match data
Jun 27, 2003* Wimbledon Grand Slam R64 Grass Emilie Loit #48 3-6 6-2 6-3 Maria Elena Camerin #98 Match data
Aug 29, 2001* US Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Emilie Loit #86 6-3 7-5 Maria Elena Camerin #97 Match data
Jul 28, 2001* Casablanca WTA 250 SF Clay Maria Elena Camerin #120 6-4 7-5 Emilie Loit #95 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Maria Elena Camerin #817 #41 774 1,666 97 147 39.8% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Emilie Loit #161 #27 1,016 1,780 162 180 47.4% 0 0 0 1 2 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Maria Elena Camerin Emilie Loit
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 1997 0–1 0.0% #243 1,498 0 0
19 2001 6–5 54.5% #112 1,546 0 0 1998 3–5 37.5% #96 1,511 0 0
20 2002 5–8 38.5% #123 1,525 0 0 1999 3–15 16.7% #101 1,424 0 0
21 2003 3–8 27.3% #100 1,495 0 0 2000 4–6 40.0% #101 1,456 0 0
22 2004 21–19 52.5% #43 1,657 0 0 2001 12–15 44.4% #95 1,548 0 0
23 2005 11–22 33.3% #99 1,563 0 0 2002 19–17 52.8% #58 1,625 0 0
24 2006 22–23 48.9% #50 1,611 0 0 2003 23–24 48.9% #41 1,673 0 0
25 2007 9–18 33.3% #100 1,546 0 0 2004 29–20 59.2% #45 1,651 0 2
26 2008 5–11 31.2% #104 1,511 0 0 2005 15–20 42.9% #82 1,546 0 2
27 2009 5–14 26.3% #114 1,475 0 0 2006 20–16 55.6% #56 1,621 0 2
28 2010 6–11 35.3% #111 1,496 0 0 2007 26–22 54.2% #43 1,609 0 3
29 2011 1–4 20.0% #177 1,491 0 0 2008 5–15 25.0% #137 1,513 0 3
30 2012 1–2 33.3% #168 1,499 0 0 2009 3–4 42.9% #161 1,531 0 3
31 2013 2–2 50.0% #192 1,520 0 0 — — — — — — —