H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Maria Elena Camerin vs Emilie Loit H2H: 3-2

Maria Elena Camerin holds a 3–2 lead over Emilie Loit in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Maria Elena Camerin leads 2–1 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Maria Elena Camerin won the 2008 US Open first round 6-0 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Maria Elena Camerin
ITA Age 44 Right-Handed 164 cm / 5'5"
H2H
3 – 2
5 main-draw meetings
Emilie Loit
FRA Age 47 Left-Handed 167 cm / 5'6"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Maria Elena Camerin #133 6-0 6-2 Emilie Loit #120 Match data Aug 27, 2008* R128 US Open Grand Slam Hard
Maria Elena Camerin #54 6-1 6-3 Emilie Loit #67 Match data Aug 25, 2006* R16 Forest Hills Tier IV → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard
Emilie Loit #48 3-6 6-2 6-3 Maria Elena Camerin #98 Match data Jun 27, 2003* R64 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
Emilie Loit #86 6-3 7-5 Maria Elena Camerin #97 Match data Aug 29, 2001* R128 US Open Grand Slam Hard
Maria Elena Camerin #120 6-4 7-5 Emilie Loit #95 Match data Jul 28, 2001* SF Casablanca Tier V → modern equivalent WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Maria Elena Camerin #817 #41 774 1,667 98 148 39.8% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Emilie Loit #161 #27 1,016 1,779 162 180 47.4% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Maria Elena Camerin Emilie Loit
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 1997 0–1 0.0% #243 1,498 0 0
19 2001 6–5 54.5% #112 1,546 0 0 1998 3–5 37.5% #96 1,512 0 0
20 2002 5–8 38.5% #123 1,524 0 0 1999 3–15 16.7% #101 1,424 0 0
21 2003 3–8 27.3% #100 1,494 0 0 2000 4–6 40.0% #101 1,457 0 0
22 2004 22–20 52.4% #43 1,663 0 0 2001 12–15 44.4% #95 1,547 0 0
23 2005 11–22 33.3% #99 1,564 0 0 2002 19–17 52.8% #58 1,625 0 0
24 2006 22–23 48.9% #50 1,610 0 0 2003 23–24 48.9% #41 1,673 0 0
25 2007 9–18 33.3% #100 1,546 0 0 2004 29–20 59.2% #45 1,668 0 2
26 2008 5–11 31.2% #104 1,512 0 0 2005 15–20 42.9% #82 1,548 0 2
27 2009 5–14 26.3% #114 1,475 0 0 2006 20–16 55.6% #56 1,622 0 2
28 2010 6–11 35.3% #111 1,495 0 0 2007 26–22 54.2% #43 1,618 0 3
29 2011 1–4 20.0% #177 1,491 0 0 2008 5–15 25.0% #137 1,518 0 3
30 2012 1–2 33.3% #168 1,499 0 0 2009 3–4 42.9% #161 1,533 0 3
31 2013 2–2 50.0% #192 1,519 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Maria Elena Camerin Emilie Loit
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
19 2001 0 1 1 0.0% 6 4 10 60.0% — — — — — — — — 1998 1 1 2 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
20 2002 3 2 5 60.0% 2 6 8 25.0% — — — — — — — — 1999 3 6 9 33.3% 0 5 5 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
21 2003 1 3 4 25.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2000 2 3 5 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — —
22 2004 16 11 27 59.3% 5 6 11 45.5% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2001 4 6 10 40.0% 7 6 13 53.8% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
23 2005 9 13 22 40.9% 1 5 6 16.7% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2002 6 7 13 46.2% 12 8 20 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 2006 16 13 29 55.2% 5 7 12 41.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2003 10 11 21 47.6% 10 8 18 55.6% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
25 2007 5 9 14 35.7% 4 7 11 36.4% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2004 6 11 17 35.3% 19 5 24 79.2% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 2008 3 4 7 42.9% 2 6 8 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2005 4 9 13 30.8% 11 9 20 55.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
27 2009 4 9 13 30.8% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 2006 5 8 13 38.5% 13 6 19 68.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
28 2010 5 4 9 55.6% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2007 9 11 20 45.0% 15 9 24 62.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
29 2011 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 2008 1 7 8 12.5% 3 6 9 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
30 2012 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2009 — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7%
31 2013 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 62 71 133 46.6% 32 56 88 36.4% 4 19 23 17.4% 0 2 2 0.0% — 51 80 131 38.9% 94 72 166 56.6% 10 14 24 41.7% 7 14 21 33.3%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 104/222 of Maria Elena Camerin's and 84/242 of Emilie Loit's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Maria Elena Camerin Emilie Loit
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
21 2003 3/11 1.0 3.3 66.3% 64.6% 48.8% 70.5% 43.5% 59.2% 39.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2004 6/42 1.0 2.7 64.3% 55.2% 46.8% 52.7% 53.4% 51.8% 45.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 2005 3/33 0.3 2.3 66.0% 47.5% 32.0% 53.9% 44.4% 42.5% 38.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 2006 19/45 0.8 3.7 62.8% 58.0% 45.5% 50.8% 51.1% 53.2% 44.0% 2003 8/47 1.3 2.4 62.2% 65.0% 52.9% 56.7% 36.8% 60.6% 43.0%
25 2007 19/27 0.7 5.8 60.3% 56.8% 40.9% 46.5% 50.0% 50.8% 44.1% 2004 4/49 1.5 3.0 58.5% 60.4% 45.6% 43.3% 45.3% 54.9% 39.2%
26 2008 13/16 0.5 4.5 63.7% 54.4% 41.2% 36.3% 47.4% 49.5% 38.7% 2005 5/35 1.4 3.0 52.1% 67.1% 43.2% 51.3% 48.2% 56.1% 48.6%
27 2009 17/19 0.7 4.3 61.7% 54.9% 39.8% 40.4% 51.9% 49.0% 45.3% 2006 15/36 2.3 2.4 63.3% 58.3% 46.8% 55.7% 48.5% 54.0% 45.5%
28 2010 14/17 1.0 5.9 63.1% 54.9% 38.3% 36.0% 51.1% 48.7% 40.7% 2007 31/48 1.8 3.0 64.1% 60.0% 45.7% 50.1% 49.0% 54.5% 45.5%
29 2011 5/5 0.6 7.4 57.0% 54.3% 32.2% 39.3% 42.9% 44.3% 43.1% 2008 15/20 2.0 2.9 66.4% 55.8% 37.9% 40.8% 41.0% 49.6% 39.2%
30 2012 3/3 1.3 4.3 57.7% 58.0% 43.3% 62.4% 58.3% 51.6% 45.0% 2009 6/7 2.7 3.5 62.6% 63.4% 43.1% 51.0% 60.7% 55.4% 40.8%
31 2013 2/4 1.0 5.0 63.2% 53.6% 39.6% 56.1% 46.5% 48.6% 47.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 104/246 0.8 4.7 62.2% 55.9% 41.2% 45.2% 50.0% 50.2% 42.9% — 84/342 1.9 2.9 63.1% 60.1% 44.8% 49.9% 46.9% 54.3% 43.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Maria Elena Camerin Emilie Loit
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 1499 112.1 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–1 — — -0.22
19 2001 1546 108.1 — — — — — +58 — 56.0% +0.12 1–2 (33%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.85 1998 1512 121.9 — — — — +45 +20 — 44.4% -0.11 0–2 0–1 — +0.24
20 2002 1525 104.8 — — — — +9 +20 — 35.7% -0.68 2–2 (50%) — — +0.88 1999 1424 101.4 — — — — +104 +28 — 26.2% -1.86 1–5 (17%) 0–3 (0%) — +0.55
21 2003 1495 108.8 +1.20 -0.47 0.973 50.2% +30 -5 — 38.5% -0.62 0–4 (0%) 2–1 (67%) 95.3 +0.46 2000 1458 109.0 — — — — +67 +11 — 45.8% -0.12 1–3 (25%) 0–2 — +0.50
22 2004 1663 123.4 -1.01 -0.43 0.934 48.6% +23 -138 -150 49.0% -0.09 9–3 (75%) 3–3 (50%) 107.2 -0.10 2001 1547 113.0 — — — — -32 -21 — 44.3% -0.61 4–5 (44%) 2–2 (50%) 99.5 +0.79
23 2005 1564 109.3 -3.27 -1.94 0.669 41.3% +36 -101 -92 36.8% -0.65 4–6 (40%) 1–6 (14%) 94.3 +1.00 2002 1626 113.6 — — — — -91 +30 — 52.4% -0.04 10–6 (63%) 4–3 (57%) 106.6 +0.19
24 2006 1611 121.4 -1.81 -0.26 0.940 49.0% +12 -112 -120 49.5% -0.03 5–6 (45%) 2–2 (50%) 99.2 +0.09 2003 1673 132.7 +2.59 +0.21 1.090 51.0% -71 +43 -104 49.1% -0.05 10–8 (56%) 5–5 (50%) 104.6 -1.57
25 2007 1547 119.6 -2.46 -0.09 0.897 47.4% +36 -41 — 39.1% -0.94 3–7 (30%) 4–3 (57%) 97.9 -0.88 2004 1668 124.9 -0.94 -1.99 0.870 46.7% -119 +171 -41 59.8% +0.45 9–6 (60%) 6–7 (46%) 102.5 +1.06
26 2008 1513 107.2 -3.15 -3.06 0.768 44.3% +74 -63 — 39.5% -0.95 1–5 (17%) 2–0 — -0.17 2005 1549 112.1 -0.35 +0.26 1.107 52.4% -55 +179 — 48.8% -0.19 3–9 (25%) 4–3 (57%) 93.9 +1.69
27 2009 1476 106.2 -4.26 +0.53 0.887 47.3% +48 -10 -46 33.3% -0.96 2–5 (29%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.07 2006 1622 125.1 -1.55 +0.33 0.990 50.1% -86 +130 — 55.7% +0.60 5–4 (56%) 5–8 (38%) 100.0 +1.39
28 2010 1496 96.3 -4.40 -1.63 0.794 44.8% +59 -78 — 34.1% -1.44 5–2 (71%) — — +0.60 2007 1619 129.8 -0.93 +0.96 1.001 50.0% -37 +141 — 55.4% +0.37 7–4 (64%) 4–4 (50%) 104.3 -0.20
29 2011 1492 104.5 -2.78 -0.88 0.774 43.8% — -65 — 27.3% -2.27 0–1 — — -0.65 2008 1518 106.1 -4.05 -3.45 0.777 44.3% 0 +121 — 30.2% -1.60 2–3 (40%) 3–5 (38%) 97.4 -0.27
30 2012 1500 108.0 -0.75 +0.30 0.931 48.5% — — — 33.3% -0.83 — 0–1 — -0.27 2009 1533 118.8 +0.06 -0.68 0.916 48.8% +33 +65 — 44.4% -0.39 2–2 (50%) 1–0 — +0.07
31 2013 1520 103.4 -0.44 -2.36 0.915 47.9% — -33 — 50.0% -0.30 1–1 1–1 — -0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1668 116.9 -2.74 -0.75 0.863 46.8% +31 -52 -105 41.9% -0.58 33–44 (43%) 18–20 (47%) 98.0 +0.68 — 1780 125.3 -1.16 -0.31 0.956 49.0% -44 +99 -67 49.4% -0.12 54–58 (48%) 34–43 (44%) 98.9 +1.24

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.