H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Maria Elena Camerin vs Gala Leon Garcia H2H: 0-1
Gala Leon Garcia holds a 1–0 lead over Maria Elena Camerin in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Gala Leon Garcia leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Gala Leon Garcia won the 2001 Palermo fourth round 6-0 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 44
Right-Handed
164 cm / 5'5"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 52
Left-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 13, 2001* | Palermo | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Gala Leon Garcia | 6-0 6-1 | Maria Elena Camerin | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maria Elena Camerin | #817 | #41 | 774 | 1,666 | 97 | 147 | 39.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gala Leon Garcia | #361 | #27 | 978 | 1,837 | 117 | 141 | 45.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Maria Elena Camerin | Gala Leon Garcia | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 2001 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #112 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2002 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #123 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2003 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #100 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #135 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2004 | 21–19 | 52.5% | #43 | 1,657 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #89 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2005 | 11–22 | 33.3% | #99 | 1,563 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #56 | 1,616 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2006 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #50 | 1,611 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #53 | 1,704 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2007 | 9–18 | 33.3% | #100 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #53 | 1,722 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2008 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #104 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 23–19 | 54.8% | #31 | 1,760 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2009 | 5–14 | 26.3% | #114 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 24–22 | 52.2% | #41 | 1,731 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2010 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #111 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 10–23 | 30.3% | #130 | 1,568 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2011 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #177 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #96 | 1,524 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2012 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #168 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #221 | 1,499 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 2013 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #192 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |