H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Maria Elena Camerin vs Lilia Osterloh H2H: 1-1

Maria Elena Camerin and Lilia Osterloh are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on grass. Most recently, Lilia Osterloh won the 2009 Birmingham second round 6-7(4) 7-5 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Maria Elena Camerin
ITA Age 44 Right-Handed 164 cm / 5'5"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main draw meetings
Lilia Osterloh
USA Age 48 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 10, 2009* Birmingham WTA 250 R64 Grass Lilia Osterloh #220 6-7(4) 7-5 6-3 Maria Elena Camerin #94 Match data
Jun 25, 2003* Wimbledon Grand Slam R128 Grass Maria Elena Camerin #98 6-1 6-4 Lilia Osterloh #226 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Maria Elena Camerin #817 #41 774 1,666 97 147 39.8% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lilia Osterloh #1,223 #41 738 1,697 83 138 37.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Maria Elena Camerin Lilia Osterloh
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 1996 1–1 50.0% #195 1,518 0 0
19 2001 6–5 54.5% #112 1,546 0 0 1997 2–2 50.0% #170 1,551 0 0
20 2002 5–8 38.5% #123 1,525 0 0 1998 0–5 0.0% #120 1,501 0 0
21 2003 3–8 27.3% #100 1,495 0 0 1999 9–13 40.9% #79 1,545 0 0
22 2004 21–19 52.5% #43 1,657 0 0 2000 15–19 44.1% #43 1,595 0 0
23 2005 11–22 33.3% #99 1,563 0 0 2001 23–25 47.9% #53 1,659 0 0
24 2006 22–23 48.9% #50 1,611 0 0 2002 7–18 28.0% #156 1,535 0 0
25 2007 9–18 33.3% #100 1,546 0 0 2003 0–2 0.0% #180 1,509 0 0
26 2008 5–11 31.2% #104 1,511 0 0 2004 4–5 44.4% #119 1,561 0 0
27 2009 5–14 26.3% #114 1,475 0 0 2005 2–9 18.2% #144 1,488 0 0
28 2010 6–11 35.3% #111 1,496 0 0 2006 6–8 42.9% #118 1,509 0 0
29 2011 1–4 20.0% #177 1,491 0 0 2007 7–12 36.8% #91 1,543 0 0
30 2012 1–2 33.3% #168 1,499 0 0 2008 3–10 23.1% #230 1,486 0 0
31 2013 2–2 50.0% #192 1,520 0 0 2009 3–3 50.0% #136 1,510 0 0
32 — — — — — — — 2010 1–6 14.3% #237 1,467 0 0