H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Maria Elena Camerin vs Lilia Osterloh H2H: 1-1

Maria Elena Camerin and Lilia Osterloh are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on grass. Most recently, Lilia Osterloh won the 2009 Birmingham round of 64 6-7(4) 7-5 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Maria Elena Camerin
ITA Age 44 Right-Handed 164 cm / 5'5"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main-draw meetings
Lilia Osterloh
USA Age 48 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Lilia Osterloh #220 6-7(4) 7-5 6-3 Maria Elena Camerin #94 Match data Jun 10, 2009* R64 Birmingham International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Grass
Maria Elena Camerin #98 6-1 6-4 Lilia Osterloh #226 Match data Jun 25, 2003* R128 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Maria Elena Camerin #817 #41 774 1,667 98 148 39.8% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lilia Osterloh #1,223 #41 738 1,696 83 138 37.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Maria Elena Camerin Lilia Osterloh
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 1996 1–1 50.0% #195 1,518 0 0
19 2001 6–5 54.5% #112 1,546 0 0 1997 2–2 50.0% #170 1,550 0 0
20 2002 5–8 38.5% #123 1,524 0 0 1998 0–5 0.0% #120 1,501 0 0
21 2003 3–8 27.3% #100 1,494 0 0 1999 9–13 40.9% #79 1,545 0 0
22 2004 22–20 52.4% #43 1,663 0 0 2000 15–19 44.1% #43 1,596 0 0
23 2005 11–22 33.3% #99 1,564 0 0 2001 23–25 47.9% #53 1,658 0 0
24 2006 22–23 48.9% #50 1,610 0 0 2002 7–18 28.0% #156 1,535 0 0
25 2007 9–18 33.3% #100 1,546 0 0 2003 0–2 0.0% #180 1,508 0 0
26 2008 5–11 31.2% #104 1,512 0 0 2004 4–5 44.4% #119 1,561 0 0
27 2009 5–14 26.3% #114 1,475 0 0 2005 2–9 18.2% #144 1,488 0 0
28 2010 6–11 35.3% #111 1,495 0 0 2006 6–8 42.9% #118 1,509 0 0
29 2011 1–4 20.0% #177 1,491 0 0 2007 7–12 36.8% #91 1,544 0 0
30 2012 1–2 33.3% #168 1,499 0 0 2008 3–10 23.1% #230 1,486 0 0
31 2013 2–2 50.0% #192 1,519 0 0 2009 3–3 50.0% #136 1,510 0 0
32 — — — — — — — 2010 1–6 14.3% #237 1,467 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Maria Elena Camerin Lilia Osterloh
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2001 0 1 1 0.0% 6 4 10 60.0% — — — — — — — — 1997 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
20 2002 3 2 5 60.0% 2 6 8 25.0% — — — — — — — — 1998 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
21 2003 1 3 4 25.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1999 6 8 14 42.9% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
22 2004 16 11 27 59.3% 5 6 11 45.5% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2000 6 9 15 40.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 5 2 7 71.4% 2 3 5 40.0%
23 2005 9 13 22 40.9% 1 5 6 16.7% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2001 14 13 27 51.9% 4 6 10 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
24 2006 16 13 29 55.2% 5 7 12 41.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2002 6 8 14 42.9% 0 7 7 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 2007 5 9 14 35.7% 4 7 11 36.4% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2003 — — — — — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
26 2008 3 4 7 42.9% 2 6 8 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2004 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2009 4 9 13 30.8% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 2005 0 3 3 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
28 2010 5 4 9 55.6% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2006 6 6 12 50.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
29 2011 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 2007 5 9 14 35.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
30 2012 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2008 3 5 8 37.5% 0 5 5 0.0% — — — — — — — —
31 2013 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2009 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
Career — 62 71 133 46.6% 32 56 88 36.4% 4 19 23 17.4% 0 2 2 0.0% — 56 76 132 42.4% 11 34 45 24.4% 11 18 29 37.9% 5 10 15 33.3%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 104/222 of Maria Elena Camerin's and 52/70 of Lilia Osterloh's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Maria Elena Camerin Lilia Osterloh
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
21 2003 3/11 1.0 3.3 66.3% 64.6% 48.8% 70.5% 43.5% 59.2% 39.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2004 6/42 1.0 2.7 64.3% 55.2% 46.8% 52.7% 53.4% 51.8% 45.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 2005 3/33 0.3 2.3 66.0% 47.5% 32.0% 53.9% 44.4% 42.5% 38.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 2006 19/45 0.8 3.7 62.8% 58.0% 45.5% 50.8% 51.1% 53.2% 44.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
25 2007 19/27 0.7 5.8 60.3% 56.8% 40.9% 46.5% 50.0% 50.8% 44.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
26 2008 13/16 0.5 4.5 63.7% 54.4% 41.2% 36.3% 47.4% 49.5% 38.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 2009 17/19 0.7 4.3 61.7% 54.9% 39.8% 40.4% 51.9% 49.0% 45.3% 2005 3/11 0.3 4.3 60.5% 46.3% 46.2% 38.9% 66.7% 46.9% 37.3%
28 2010 14/17 1.0 5.9 63.1% 54.9% 38.3% 36.0% 51.1% 48.7% 40.7% 2006 7/14 0.9 3.6 66.1% 56.0% 39.1% 42.7% 47.9% 49.6% 46.1%
29 2011 5/5 0.6 7.4 57.0% 54.3% 32.2% 39.3% 42.9% 44.3% 43.1% 2007 17/19 1.8 3.6 60.1% 54.8% 45.0% 46.6% 44.5% 50.6% 43.6%
30 2012 3/3 1.3 4.3 57.7% 58.0% 43.3% 62.4% 58.3% 51.6% 45.0% 2008 12/13 1.3 4.6 58.3% 60.2% 37.4% 55.9% 42.2% 50.7% 42.9%
31 2013 2/4 1.0 5.0 63.2% 53.6% 39.6% 56.1% 46.5% 48.6% 47.0% 2009 6/6 2.2 2.7 62.8% 60.1% 48.3% 55.1% 59.7% 56.1% 39.6%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2010 7/7 2.9 3.0 61.3% 57.0% 39.1% 47.3% 54.5% 50.0% 37.0%
Career — 104/246 0.8 4.7 62.2% 55.9% 41.2% 45.2% 50.0% 50.2% 42.9% — 52/221 1.7 3.7 61.0% 56.6% 42.1% 48.9% 48.8% 50.8% 42.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Maria Elena Camerin Lilia Osterloh
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1519 110.9 — — — — — — — 50.0% +0.50 — — — -0.06
19 2001 1546 108.1 — — — — — +58 — 56.0% +0.12 1–2 (33%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.85 1997 1551 112.0 — — — — +33 — — 28.6% -2.00 1–0 — — +0.04
20 2002 1525 104.8 — — — — +9 +20 — 35.7% -0.68 2–2 (50%) — — +0.88 1998 1502 105.3 — — — — +38 — — 23.1% -1.85 0–3 (0%) 0–1 — +0.07
21 2003 1495 108.8 +1.20 -0.47 0.973 50.2% +30 -5 — 38.5% -0.62 0–4 (0%) 2–1 (67%) 95.3 +0.46 1999 1546 126.1 — — — — +29 +17 +5 40.0% -0.98 4–2 (67%) — — -0.06
22 2004 1663 123.4 -1.01 -0.43 0.934 48.6% +23 -138 -150 49.0% -0.09 9–3 (75%) 3–3 (50%) 107.2 -0.10 2000 1596 120.7 — — — — -34 -49 +61 42.5% -0.41 8–6 (57%) 3–8 (27%) 101.9 -0.05
23 2005 1564 109.3 -3.27 -1.94 0.669 41.3% +36 -101 -92 36.8% -0.65 4–6 (40%) 1–6 (14%) 94.3 +1.00 2001 1658 133.0 — — — — -4 -132 +27 49.5% -0.09 5–8 (38%) 7–4 (64%) 100.9 -0.27
24 2006 1611 121.4 -1.81 -0.26 0.940 49.0% +12 -112 -120 49.5% -0.03 5–6 (45%) 2–2 (50%) 99.2 +0.09 2002 1535 110.8 — — — — +102 -112 +96 29.3% -1.59 5–3 (63%) 2–3 (40%) 102.7 -1.31
25 2007 1547 119.6 -2.46 -0.09 0.897 47.4% +36 -41 — 39.1% -0.94 3–7 (30%) 4–3 (57%) 97.9 -0.88 2003 1509 94.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.75 — — — +0.04
26 2008 1513 107.2 -3.15 -3.06 0.768 44.3% +74 -63 — 39.5% -0.95 1–5 (17%) 2–0 — -0.17 2004 1561 130.0 — — — — +95 — — 47.6% -0.38 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — -0.58
27 2009 1476 106.2 -4.26 +0.53 0.887 47.3% +48 -10 -46 33.3% -0.96 2–5 (29%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.07 2005 1488 99.5 -2.44 -2.36 0.703 41.7% +105 -60 — 28.0% -2.08 0–3 (0%) 0–1 — -0.27
28 2010 1496 96.3 -4.40 -1.63 0.794 44.8% +59 -78 — 34.1% -1.44 5–2 (71%) — — +0.60 2006 1510 110.3 -2.68 -0.13 0.914 47.9% +82 — — 46.9% -0.19 3–3 (50%) 1–4 (20%) 98.8 +0.94
29 2011 1492 104.5 -2.78 -0.88 0.774 43.8% — -65 — 27.3% -2.27 0–1 — — -0.65 2007 1545 117.7 -3.39 +0.08 0.882 46.8% +27 — — 41.9% -0.91 1–4 (20%) 1–0 — -0.55
30 2012 1500 108.0 -0.75 +0.30 0.931 48.5% — — — 33.3% -0.83 — 0–1 — -0.27 2008 1486 100.1 -3.07 -1.01 0.871 46.7% +64 -97 — 24.0% -1.44 1–0 1–3 (25%) — +0.06
31 2013 1520 103.4 -0.44 -2.36 0.915 47.9% — -33 — 50.0% -0.30 1–1 1–1 — -0.06 2009 1511 100.3 -0.43 -1.46 0.901 48.5% +43 — — 40.0% -0.40 3–0 (100%) 0–1 — +0.33
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1468 100.5 -2.57 -3.96 0.740 43.5% +60 — — 18.8% -2.19 1–1 0–1 — -0.29
Career — 1668 116.9 -2.74 -0.75 0.863 46.8% +31 -52 -105 41.9% -0.58 33–44 (43%) 18–20 (47%) 98.0 +0.68 — 1696 123.9 -2.71 -1.06 0.855 46.4% +34 -80 +48 39.2% -0.82 33–35 (49%) 16–27 (37%) 99.8 -0.89

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.