H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Maria Elena Camerin vs Ludmila Cervanova H2H: 2-0
Maria Elena Camerin holds a 2–0 lead over Ludmila Cervanova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Maria Elena Camerin leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Maria Elena Camerin won the 2004 Hobart third round 6-7(5) 7-6(3) 7-6(7).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 44
Right-Handed
164 cm / 5'5"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
SVK
Age 46
Right-Handed
171 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 15, 2004* | Hobart | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Maria Elena Camerin | 6-7(5) 7-6(3) 7-6(7) | Ludmila Cervanova | Match data |
| Jul 26, 2001* | Casablanca | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Maria Elena Camerin | 7-6(3) 4-6 6-4 | Ludmila Cervanova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maria Elena Camerin | #817 | #41 | 774 | 1,666 | 97 | 147 | 39.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Ludmila Cervanova | #889 | #58 | 578 | 1,694 | 76 | 96 | 44.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Maria Elena Camerin | Ludmila Cervanova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #135 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2001 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #112 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #102 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2002 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #123 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #122 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2003 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #100 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #92 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2004 | 21–19 | 52.5% | #43 | 1,657 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #103 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2005 | 11–22 | 33.3% | #99 | 1,563 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 20–14 | 58.8% | #64 | 1,642 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2006 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #50 | 1,611 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #96 | 1,629 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2007 | 9–18 | 33.3% | #100 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #119 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2008 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #104 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 3–1 | 75.0% | #325 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2009 | 5–14 | 26.3% | #114 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2010 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #111 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2011 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #177 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2012 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #168 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2013 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #192 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |