H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Maria Elena Camerin vs María Emilia Salerni H2H: 0-2
María Emilia Salerni holds a 2–0 lead over Maria Elena Camerin in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, María Emilia Salerni leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, María Emilia Salerni won the 2008 Bogota fourth round 4-6 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 44
Right-Handed
164 cm / 5'5"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
ARG
Age 43
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 22, 2008* | Bogota | WTA 500 | R16 | Clay | María Emilia Salerni | 4-6 6-2 6-3 | Maria Elena Camerin | Match data |
| Jul 26, 2007* | Bad Gastein | WTA 500 | R32 | Clay | María Emilia Salerni | 6-4 7-6(4) | Maria Elena Camerin | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maria Elena Camerin | #817 | #41 | 774 | 1,666 | 97 | 147 | 39.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| María Emilia Salerni | #328 | #65 | 471 | 1,553 | 30 | 60 | 33.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Maria Elena Camerin | María Emilia Salerni | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #201 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #122 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2001 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #112 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #127 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2002 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #123 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 0–6 | 0.0% | #173 | 1,425 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2003 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #100 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 7–3 | 70.0% | #115 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2004 | 21–19 | 52.5% | #43 | 1,657 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 3–14 | 17.6% | #148 | 1,451 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2005 | 11–22 | 33.3% | #99 | 1,563 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2006 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #50 | 1,611 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #87 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2007 | 9–18 | 33.3% | #100 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #241 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2008 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #104 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #330 | 1,452 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2009 | 5–14 | 26.3% | #114 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2010 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #111 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2011 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #177 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2012 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #168 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2013 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #192 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |